Eplerenone, ACE Inhibition and Albuminuria

May 25, 2012 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center
The purpose of this study is to determine whether eplerenone is more effective than doubling the dose of ACE inhibitor in reducing urinary protein (albumin) loss in diabetes mellitus

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

In patients with proteinuric renal diseases renal function almost invariably deteriorates, independent from the original renal disease. It has been demonstrated that the rapidity of renal function deterioration is determined by blood pressure and proteinuria1. Treatment modalities that lower proteinuria in general tend to attenuate the deterioration of renal function. As such, ACE-inhibitors have been proven to be of particular value in the treatment of patients with proteinuria, since these drugs consistently lower proteinuria. More recently, similar antiproteinuric effects have been described for the angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). Theoretically, ACE inhibitors may have advantages over ARBs because they are supposed to increase bradykinin levels. Bradykinin has also been implicated in the development of nephropathy in mice. About its role in human diabetic nephropathy few if any data exist. The effect of ACE inhibition or ARBs is not complete, since addition of either drug to the other may further improve albuminuria. This may be explained by insufficient dosage of single drug therapy or because of an escape phenomenon. The latter has been amply described for ACE inhibitors. Especially with chronic ACE inhibition angiotensin II levels may be near normal. This may lead to persistent angiotensin II effects, among which aldosterone stimulation.

Even though most investigators have emphasized the role of the renin-angiotensin system in progressive renal injury, aldosterone has received little attention. However, its profibrotic effects make aldosterone a potentially important player in the field, even more so because the escape of aldosterone during treatment with ACE-inhibitors or ARBs. Moreover, in addition to these theoretical considerations, evidence is emerging that mineralocorticoid receptor blockade with spironolactone added to ACE-inhibitors or ARBs indeed has an additive, favourable effect on proteinuria. These findings warrant a search for the value of such agents in albuminuria and exploration of the mechanisms by which mineralocorticoid blockade may exert its beneficial effects.

Primary aim:

1. To study whether the combination of eplerenone and a standard dose of ACE-inhibition has an additive effect on albuminuria in patients with albuminuric nephropathy compared to ACE-I alone, or double dose of ACE-inhibitor.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 GA
        • University Medical Center Nijmegen st Radboud
    • Noord Brabant
      • 's-Hertogenbosch, Noord Brabant, Netherlands
        • Jeroen Bosch Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 73 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • documented diabetic renal disease with albuminuria >0.020 g/L, stable renal function (i.e. increase of serum creatinine <25% / 6 months), creatinine clearance > 40 ml/min/1.73 m2 , in spite of maximal ACE-inhibition (40 mg fosinopril/day)
  • blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg ( at baseline)
  • serum potassium < 5.0 mmol/l (at baseline).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • use of NSAID's or immunosuppressive drugs
  • use of ARBs, intolerance for ACE inhibition.
  • use of diuretics that increase potassium such as triamterene, spironolactone or eplerenone
  • pregnancy
  • rash or cough on one on the drugs
  • severe heart disease or instable angina

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 1
placebo (double dummy)
placebo (double dummy)
Other Names:
  • no other name
Active Comparator: 2
eplerenone
active comparator
Other Names:
  • Eplerenone or INSPRA
Active Comparator: 3
doubling of fosinopril dose
doubling of fosinopril dose
Other Names:
  • fosinopril or Newace

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
proteinuria
Time Frame: 0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
blood pressure by home measurements
Time Frame: 0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
serum potassium
Time Frame: 0, 3, days, 2, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 3, days, 2, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
haemoglobin
Time Frame: 0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
urinary excretion of CTGF, TGF-b, collagen IV
Time Frame: 0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
inulin and PAH clearance
Time Frame: 0, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 24 and 30 weeks
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 4, 12, 24 and 30 weeks
plasma aldosterone, renin
Time Frame: 0, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 24 and 30 weeks
plasma angiotensins and bradykinins
Time Frame: 0, 24 and 30 weeks
0, 24 and 30 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacob Deinum, MD, University Medical Center Nijmegen St Radboud, The Netherlands

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 14, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

April 17, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 28, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 25, 2012

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe