Cost-effectiveness of Two Painkillers for Treating Pain After Limb Injuries

June 3, 2021 updated by: Colin Graham, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Oral Paracetamol and Ibuprofen for Treating Pain After Soft Tissue Limb Injuries: Double-blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

Background: Paracetamol and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen are commonly used oral analgesics in emergency departments (ED) not only in Hong Kong but throughout the world. There are no large-scale (n>100), prospective, randomised studies comparing paracetamol with ibuprofen in the management of acute soft tissue injury.

As paracetamol is cheaper than most NSAIDs, may be as effective in the management of acute pain and possibly with fewer adverse effects, a large-scale, randomised, controlled trial is needed to answer questions of relative analgesic efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness. Previous comparative studies on NSAIDS have been done in this unit and have suggested equivalence between two NSAIDs and paracetamol, but numbers were small and drug doses were modest.

Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety and cost between oral ibuprofen and paracetamol in pain control for acute soft tissue injuries in an ED setting

Design: Prospective, double-blind, randomised controlled trial with three arms: oral paracetamol with placebo; oral ibuprofen with placebo; paracetamol and ibuprofen in combination

Participants: 783 subjects having sustained isolated soft tissue limb injury without significant fracture presenting to the ED of Prince of Wales Hospital

Main outcome measures: Pain relief profiles of paracetamol, ibuprofen and the combination of both; adverse effect profiles of paracetamol, ibuprofen and the combination of both; overall cost effectiveness of paracetamol, ibuprofen and the combination of both from the perspective of the healthcare provider

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

782

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • NT
      • Sha Tin, NT, Hong Kong
        • Prince of Wales Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients >16 years presenting to the ED with isolated soft tissue injury without significant fracture
  • between 9am to 5pm, Monday to Friday,

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of :

    • peptic ulceration or hemorrhage
    • recent anticoagulation
    • pregnancy
    • adverse reaction to paracetamol or ibuprofen
    • renal or cardiac failure
    • hepatic problems
    • rectal bleeding
    • chronic NSAID consumption
    • asthma
    • chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
    • chronic pain syndromes
    • prior treatment with analgesia for the same injury
    • physical, visual or cognitive impairment making use of the visual analogue scale unreliable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 1
1g qid
Equivalent to 400mg tid
EXPERIMENTAL: 2
400mg tid
equivalent to 1g qid
EXPERIMENTAL: 3
1g qid
400mg tid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
analgesic efficacy both at rest and with movement
Time Frame: 72 hours
72 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
presence, frequency and duration of adverse effects; cost-effectiveness analysis; patient satisfaction with analgesia
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Colin A Graham, Chinese University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 12, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

June 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Injuries

Clinical Trials on Paracetamol

3
Subscribe