Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Steroid or Placebo in Combination With Salmeterol and Tiotropium in COPD

May 22, 2014 updated by: Boehringer Ingelheim

A Randomised, Phase II, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Four-period Crossover Efficacy and Safety Comparison of 4-Week Treatment Periods of Blinded Fluticasone (500 mcg Bid, MDI), Ciclesonide (400 mcg qd, MDI), Ciclesonide (800 mcg qd, MDI) or Placebo in Free Combination With Open-Label Tiotropium (18 mcg qd, HandiHaler) and Salmeterol (50 mcg Bid, Diskus) in Patients With COPD.

This efficacy and safety study compares four different combinations of blinded inhaled steroid treatments on top of open-label tiotropium and salmeterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The primary objective is the effect on lung function parameters.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

103

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Genk, Belgium
        • 1249.1.32003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Gent, Belgium
        • 1249.1.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Hasselt, Belgium
        • 1249.1.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Oostende, Belgium
        • 1249.1.32004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Aarhus C, Denmark
        • 1249.1.45001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Großhansdorf, Germany
        • 1249.1.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Mannheim, Germany
        • 1249.1.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Weinheim, Germany
        • 1249.1.49003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands
        • 1249.1.31002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Harderwijk, Netherlands
        • 1249.1.31003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Heerlen, Netherlands
        • 1249.1.31001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
      • Veldhoven, Netherlands
        • 1249.1.31004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Relatively stable, moderate to severe COPD
  • Male or female patients 40 years of age or older.
  • Current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of more than 10 pack years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other significant disease that can influence the study results or be a safety risk for the patient
  • Other medication that can influence the study results
  • Hypersensitivity to the study medication
  • Patients with unstable COPD

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Oral inhalation by HandiHaler® device
Oral inhalation from Diskus®
Oral inhalation from MDI
Experimental: Tiotropium+salmeterol+fluticasone
Oral inhalation by HandiHaler® device
Oral inhalation from Diskus®
Oral inhalation from metered dose inhaler (MDI)
Experimental: Tiotropium+salmeterol+ciclesonide low
Oral inhalation by HandiHaler® device
Oral inhalation from Diskus®
Oral inhalation from MDI
Experimental: Tiotropium+salmeterol+ciclesonide high
Oral inhalation by HandiHaler® device
Oral inhalation from Diskus®
Oral inhalation from MDI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Trough FEV1 response at the end of each 4 week period of randomised treatment
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Trough forced vital capacity (FVC) response after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
Time Frame: after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
All adverse events
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Pulse rate and blood pressure (seated)
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
FEV1 and FVC morning peak response
Time Frame: day 1 and day 28 of each blinded treatment
day 1 and day 28 of each blinded treatment
FEV1 and FVC evening peak response
Time Frame: day 1 and day 28 of each blinded treatment
day 1 and day 28 of each blinded treatment
FEV1 AUC (0-3h), after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
Time Frame: after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
FEV1 AUC (12-15h) after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
Time Frame: after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
FVC AUC (0-3h) after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
Time Frame: after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
FVC AUC (12-15h) after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
Time Frame: after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
Trough and peak inspiratory capacity (IC) and vital capacity (VC) response in the morning of day 1 and at day 28 of each treatment period
Time Frame: day 1 and day 28 of each blinded treatment
day 1 and day 28 of each blinded treatment
Weekly mean pre-dose morning and evening peak expiratory flow (PEF)
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Weekly mean number of occasions of rescue therapy used per day
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Mahler Dyspnea Indices (TDI) collected at the end of each treatment period and each wash-out period
Time Frame: 28 weeks
28 weeks
Fractional exhaled nitric oxide after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
Time Frame: after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment
after 4 weeks of each blinded treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2014

Last Verified

May 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Clinical Trials on Tiotropium

3
Subscribe