- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00740987
Efficacy of the Association Mechanical Prophylaxis + Anticoagulant Prophylaxis on Venous Thromboembolism Incidence in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (CIREA2)
Evaluation of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Associated With Elastic Stockings and Anticoagulant Prophylaxis Versus Anticoagulant Prophylaxis Alone on Venous Thromboembolism Incidence in ICU Patients Without High Risk of Bleeding
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background: Venous thromboembolism is a leading cause of morbi-mortality for patients hospitalized in intensive medical care units. Nevertheless, few studies evaluating prophylactic methods exist. Data from these studies demonstrate however that unfractionated heparin and low molecular weight heparin are effective to reduce the incident rate of asymptomatic deep venous thrombosis (DVT) of the lower limbs by 50 % compared to the absence of prophylaxis. Rate of asymptomatic DVT remains about 15 %. Mechanical devices such as elastic stockings (ES) or intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), devoid of bleeding risk, can be associated with heparins, with good efficacy in some specific clinical settings. The effect of combined treatment use has never been evaluated rigorously in intensive medical care units.
Objective:
To compare the association IPC+ ES + anticoagulant prophylaxis to anticoagulant prophylaxis alone in patients without high bleeding risk and hospitalized in medical intensive care units on symptomatic or asymptomatic venous thromboembolism incidence, evaluated systematically at day 6.
Design: Multicentre open-label randomized parallel-group trial with blinded evaluation of outcomes, and an inclusion period of 24 month. Brest CIC (Centre d'Investigations cliniques, research center) coordinates this multicentre trial.
Outcomes:
The primary endpoint is a combined criterion (blindly evaluated) between day 1 and day 6:
1) Non fatal symptomatic venous thromboembolic event (objectively confirmed) between day 1 and day 6, 2) death due to a pulmonary embolism between day 1 and day 6, and 3) asymptomatic DVT detected by ultrasonography systematically done at day 6.
Patients number:
Assuming a DVT frequency of 10 % in the control group (anticoagulant prophylaxis alone), we calculated that 1436 patients will be required for the study to have 80% power to detect a 40 % reduction in the relative risk with a two-sided alpha level of 5%. Because of about 20 % deaths in the first days, we decide to increase the number at 1580 subjects.
Statistical analysis:
Efficacy analysis is performed on an 'intention-to-treat' basis. The frequencies of the combined primary outcome at day 6 are compared between groups using an exact one-sided Fischer test. Adjustment for stratification variables used Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. Relative risk and absolute risk reduction are computed with their 95% CIs. A logistic regression model is used to take into account potential imbalance in baseline characteristics.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Angers, France, 49000
- CHU d'Angers
-
Angoulême, France, 16000
- CH D'Angouleme
-
Brest, France
- Medical Intensive Care Unit
-
Brest, France, 29 200
- HIA Clermont-Tonnerre
-
Corbeil Essonne, France, 91100
- CH de Corbeil Essonne
-
Dijon, France, 21000
- CHU de Dijon
-
Lille, France
- Medical Intensive Care Unit
-
Montauban, France, 82013
- CH Montauban
-
Morlaix, France, 29672
- CH de Morlaix
-
Paris, France
- Medical Intensive Care Unit
-
Poitiers, France, 86000
- CHU De Poitiers
-
Quimper, France, 29000
- CH de Quimper
-
Saint Malo, France, 35403
- CH de St Malo
-
Tours, France, 37000
- CHU de Tours
-
-
-
-
-
Monaco, Monaco
- CH Monaco
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18 Years,
- Admission in intensive medical care unit
- No high risk for hemorrhage in CIREA 2
- Written informed consent given by the patient or relative.
High risk for hemorrhage is defined by:
- symptomatic bleeding or organic lesions likely to bleed,
- hemophilic diseases,
- haemostatic abnormalities: platelet count < 50 000/mm 3, APTT > 2 N, prothrombin time < 40%,
- recent intra-cerebral hemorrhage,
- severe anemia (Hemoglobin < 7 g/dl) due to a bleeding or unexplained.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 years,
- Patient refusal,
- Admission in intensive care unit ≥ 36 hours
- Admission in intensive care unit likely for < 72 hours
- A "do not resuscitate" order
- IPC contra-indication: Recent DVT (< 3 month), severe lower limbs arteriopathy (III and IV), any arterial graft of the legs, a wound in the lower limb related either to a vascular disease (ulcer) or a trauma.
- High risk for hemorrhage
- Patient who needs a curative anticoagulant treatment (DVT, PE, PE suspicion, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome…).
- Patients with anticoagulant prophylaxis contra-indication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
No Intervention: 1
No Intermittent pneumatic compression of the lower limbs during hospitalisation in reanimation unit
|
|
Experimental: 2
Intermittent pneumatic compression of the lower limbs during hospitalisation in reanimation unit
|
No Intermittent pneumatic compression of the lower limbs during hospitalisation in reanimation unit
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
combined criterion evaluated at day 6 ± 2 days after randomization: symptomatic venous thromboembolic event, non fatal, objectively confirmed, Death related to PE, Asymptomatic DVT of the lower limbs detected by CUS on day 6.
Time Frame: 6 +/- 2 days
|
6 +/- 2 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Symptomatic thromboembolic events occurred between day 6 and day 90, and total mortality evaluated at 1 month and 3 months.
Time Frame: 6 days to 3 months
|
6 days to 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CIREA2
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on No High Risk of Hemorrhage
-
University of ÉvoraSão João de Deus School of Nursing; Horizon 2020 - Portugal 2020 (ALT20-03-0145-FEDER-000007...CompletedFallers | High Risk of FallingPortugal
-
University of ChicagoNorthwestern University; University of Illinois at Chicago; Rush University Medical... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingMedicare Patients | High Risk of HospitalizationsUnited States
-
University Hospital MuensterVifor PharmaTerminatedAnemia | Orthopedic Surgery | High Risk of Blood LossGermany
-
Queen's University, BelfastCompletedPatients at High Risk of Medicine-related ProblemsUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital, MontpellierNot yet recruitingPatients at High-Risk of a Cardiovascular Event
-
Meir Medical CenterUnknownHigh Risk Pregnancies | Telomere Length | Mechanisms of Telomter HomeostasisIsrael
-
Institut CurieCompletedMetastatic and/or High Risk Solid Tumor of ChildrenFrance
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompletedUnplanned Hospital Readmissions | Patients at High Risk of Unplanned ReadmissionUnited States
-
University Hospital, BordeauxCompletedCardiac Surgery | Cardiopulmonary Bypass | High Risk BleedingFrance
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedHigh-risk Patients for Post-ESD BleedingKorea, Republic of
Clinical Trials on Intermittent pneumatic compression of the lower limbs
-
University Hospital, BrestTyco Healthcare GroupCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedCoronary Heart DiseaseUnited States
-
Karolinska University HospitalEnrolling by invitationHealing Wound | Venous Stasis | Deep Venous ThrombosisSweden
-
Karolinska University HospitalCompletedDeep Vein Thrombosis | Venous Stasis
-
Venous Health Systems, Inc.CompletedVenous ThrombosisUnited States
-
Laboratoires URGOCompleted
-
Walter Reed National Military Medical CenterWithdrawnEkbom Syndrome | Restless Legs Syndrome, | Restless Legs,United States
-
Feng TianActive, not recruitingApplication of IPC During Surgery to Prevent Venous Thrombosis in Gastrointestinal Surgery Patients.Stomach Neoplasms | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms | Intestinal NeoplasmsChina
-
Cwm Taf University Health Board (NHS)University of South WalesCompletedLymphoedema of LegUnited Kingdom
-
Western States Endurance Run Research FoundationCompletedMusculoskeletal PainUnited States