Long-term Follow-Up of Patients Who Participated in Study 27025 (REFLEX) (REFLEXION)

January 25, 2017 updated by: Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Double-blind Extension of the Study 27025 (REFLEX) to Obtain Long-term Follow-up Data in Patients With Clinically Definite MS and Patients With a First Demyelinating Event at High Risk of Converting to MS, Treated With Rebif® New Formulation (REFLEXION)

REFLEXION is a double blind extension of the study 27025 (NCT00404352) (REFLEX). The purpose of the study is to obtain long-term follow-up data in subjects with clinically definite multiple sclerosis (MS) and subjects with a first demyelinating event at high risk of converting to MS, treated with fetal bovine serum [FBS]-free/human serum albumin [HSA]-free formulation of interferon [IFN]-beta-1a (RNF).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of the study is to investigate whether RNF treatment initiated after the first clinical event versus delayed treatment results in the prolongation of time to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) conversion up to Month 36 and up to Month 60 since randomization in Study 27025 (REFLEX). Furthermore, the study is intended to explore whether RNF treatment initiated after the first clinical event versus delayed treatment delays disability (including development of secondary progressive MS) and reduces disease activity (including the annual relapse rate [ARR]) in the long term (up to Month 36 and up to Month 60 since randomization in Study 27025 (REFLEX). The study will also assess the long-term safety profile of RNF (up to Month 36 and up to Month 60 since randomization in Study 27025 (REFLEX).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

402

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mendoza, Argentina
        • Research Site
      • Graz, Austria
        • Research Site
      • Brugge, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Leuven, Belgium
        • Research Site
      • Pleven, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Rousse, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Shumen, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Varna, Bulgaria
        • Research Site
      • Ontario, Canada
        • Research Site
      • Victoria British Columbia, Canada
        • Research Site
      • Karlovac, Croatia
        • Research Site
      • Osijek, Croatia
        • Research Site
      • Rijeka, Croatia
        • Research Site
      • Split, Croatia
        • Research Site
      • Zagreb, Croatia
        • Research Site
      • Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Olomouc, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Prague, Czech Republic
        • Research Site
      • Tallinn, Estonia
        • Research Site
      • Tartu, Estonia
        • Research Site
      • Oulu, Finland
        • Research Site
      • Paris, France
        • Research Site
      • Poissy Cedex, France
        • Research Site
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Henningsforf, Germany
        • Research Site
      • Athens, Greece
        • Research Site
      • Safed, Israel
        • Research Site
      • Tel-Hashomer, Israel
        • Research Site
      • Milano, Italy
        • Research Site
      • Padova, Italy
        • Research Site
      • Riga, Latvia
        • Research Site
      • Beirut, Lebanon
        • Research Site
      • Rabat, Morocco
        • Research Site
      • Bialystok, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Lodz, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Wroclaw, Poland
        • Research Site
      • Lisbon, Portugal
        • Research Site
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Iasi, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Targu-Mures, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Timisoara, Romania
        • Research Site
      • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Novgorod, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Samara, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Saratov, Russian Federation
        • Research Site
      • Belgrade, Serbia
        • Reserch site
      • Nis, Serbia
        • Research Site
      • Presov, Slovakia
        • Research Site
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Research Site
      • Bilbao, Spain
        • Research Site
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Research Site
      • Seville, Spain
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Reach scheduled end of study in Study 27025 (REFLEX) (completion of 24 months participation)
  • Medical assessment by the Investigator/treating physician from study 27025 that there is no objection to the subject's participation in this extension trial considering the medical experience from Study 27025 (REFLEX). Special attention should be given to laboratory abnormalities and clinically significant liver, renal and bone-marrow dysfunction
  • If female, subject must:

    • be neither pregnant nor breast-feeding, nor attempting to conceive
    • use a highly effective method of contraception. A highly effective method of contraception is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (that is [i.e.] less than 1 percent [%] per year) when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine devices (IUDs), sexual abstinence or vasectomized partner
  • Subject is willing to follow study procedures
  • Subject has given written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has any disease other than MS that could better explain the subject's signs and symptoms
  • Subject has a primary progressive course of MS
  • Subject has total bilirubin greater than 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN) at both Month 24 and at the previous visit (i.e. Month 21) (subjects with greater than 2.5 times ULN at Month 24 only are eligible for enrollment and should be managed as per label recommendations until normalization of the value)
  • Subject has total aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or alkaline phosphatase (ALP) greater than 2.5 times the ULN values at both Month 24 and at the previous visit (i.e. Month 21) (subjects with greater than 2.5 times ULN at Month 24 only are eligible for enrollment and should be managed as per label recommendations until normalization of the value)
  • Subject suffers from another current autoimmune disease
  • Subject suffers from major medical or psychiatric illness (including history of, or current, severe depressive disorders and/or suicidal ideation) that in the opinion of the investigator creates undue risk to the subject or could affect compliance with the study protocol
  • Subject has a history of seizures not adequately controlled by treatment
  • Subject has cardiac disease, such as angina, congestive heart failure or arrhythmia
  • Subject has a known allergy to IFN-beta or the excipient(s) of the study medication
  • Subject has any condition that could interfere with the MRI evaluation
  • Subject has a known allergy to gadolinium-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA)
  • Subject has a history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Subject has previously participated in this study
  • Subject has moderate to severe renal impairment
  • Subject is pregnant or lactating
  • Subject has any medical, psychiatric or other conditions that compromise his/her ability to understand the subject information, to give informed consent, to comply with the study protocol, or to complete the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: RNF 44 mcg thrice weekly
Single dose of RNF will be administered subcutaneously three times weekly at least 48 hours apart at a starting dose of 8.8 microgram (mcg) for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Single dose of RNF will be administered subcutaneously once weekly at a starting dose of 8.8 mcg for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Participants who were initially randomized in Study 27025 (REFLEX) to the placebo treatment group will be switched to single dose of RNF administered subcutaneously three times weekly at least 48 hours apart at a dose of 8.8 mcg for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Active Comparator: RNF 44 mcg once weekly and placebo
Single dose of RNF will be administered subcutaneously three times weekly at least 48 hours apart at a starting dose of 8.8 microgram (mcg) for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Single dose of RNF will be administered subcutaneously once weekly at a starting dose of 8.8 mcg for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Participants who were initially randomized in Study 27025 (REFLEX) to the placebo treatment group will be switched to single dose of RNF administered subcutaneously three times weekly at least 48 hours apart at a dose of 8.8 mcg for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Single dose matching placebo will be administered subcutaneously twice weekly. Placebo is supplied as a transparent, sterile solution for injection in pre-filled syringes matching the RNF pre-filled syringes, each containing 0.5 milliliter (mL).
Active Comparator: Placebo/RNF 44 mcg thrice weekly
Single dose of RNF will be administered subcutaneously three times weekly at least 48 hours apart at a starting dose of 8.8 microgram (mcg) for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Single dose of RNF will be administered subcutaneously once weekly at a starting dose of 8.8 mcg for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®
Participants who were initially randomized in Study 27025 (REFLEX) to the placebo treatment group will be switched to single dose of RNF administered subcutaneously three times weekly at least 48 hours apart at a dose of 8.8 mcg for first 2 weeks followed by 22 mcg for next 2 weeks and finally 44 mcg until 60 months.
Other Names:
  • Rebif®

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Defined by Either a Second Attack or a Sustained Increase (Greater Than or Equal to 1.5 Points) in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score up to 36 Months
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to 36 Months
CDMS was defined by the occurrence of a second attack or relapse over 36 months in participants who presented with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) accompanied by an abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis [MS]) was calculated. Time to conversion to CDMS was represented by Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative percentage (%) of participants with CDMS.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to 36 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression up to 36 Months
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to 36 Months
EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. A confirmed EDSS progression was defined EDSS greater than or equal to 1.0 point confirmed during a visit performed 6 months later. Time to confirmed EDSS progression was represented by Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative percentage (%) of participants with confirmed EDSS progression.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to 36 Months
Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions, New Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions, New Gadolinium Enhanced (Gd+) Lesions and New Time Constant 1 (T1) Lesions Per Participant Per Scan at Month 36
Time Frame: Month 36
Number of CUA lesions, new T2 lesions, new Gd+ lesions and new T1 lesions were measured by using MRI scans.
Month 36
Change From Baseline in Time Constant 1 (T1) Hypointense Lesion Volume and Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesion Volume at Month 36
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 36
Change from baseline in lesion volume was measured by using MRI scans for T1 hypointense lesions and T2 lesions at Month 36
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 36
Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume at Month 36
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 36
Percent change in brain volume was measured by using MRI scans.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 36
Percentage of Participants With Conversion to McDonald Multiple Sclerosis (MS) up to 36 Months
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to CDMS conversion and/or up to 36 Months
The McDonald criteria use dissemination in time and space established by MRI findings to provide a clinical diagnosis for MS. Dissemination in time is established by a new T2 or Gd+ lesion found on a repeat MRI. Dissemination in space is established by the presence of any 3 of the following: 1 Gd+ lesion or 9 T2 bright lesions if there is no enhancement; greater than or equal to 1 infratentorial lesion; greater than or equal to 1 juxtacortical lesion; greater than or equal to 3 periventricular lesions.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to CDMS conversion and/or up to 36 Months
Change From Baseline in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test 3 (PASAT-3) Score at Month 36
Time Frame: Baseline (Day of Study 27025), Month 36
The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) is a measure of cognitive function that specifically assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. Score ranges from '0-60'. Higher scores reflect better neurological function and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline (Day of Study 27025), Month 36
Percentage of Relapse-Free Participants at Month 36
Time Frame: Month 36
A relapse was defined as the development of new or the exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms or signs, in the absence of fever, lasting for 24 hours and with a previous period for more than 30 days with a stable or an improving condition.
Month 36
Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Month 36
Time Frame: Baseline (Day of Study 27025), Month 36
EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. The change in EDSS score at Month 36 was calculated as EDSS score at Month 36 minus EDSS score at baseline.
Baseline (Day of Study 27025), Month 36
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score at Month 36
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 36
The MSFC is a multidimensional clinical outcome measure which consists of three sub-tests; Timed 25-Foot Walk, 9-Hole Peg Test and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3(PASAT-3). The Timed 25-Foot Walk is a quantitative measure of lower extremity function. The 9-Hole Peg Test is a quantitative measure of upper extremity (arm and hand) function. The PASAT is a measure of cognitive function that specifically assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. Standardized results (Z-scores) of these sub-tests and the overall MSFC Z-score as an average of these three Z-scores was calculated. Higher Z-scores reflect better neurological function and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement. An increase in score indicates an improvement (range -3 to +3).
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 36
Numbers of Participants With Binding Antibodies (BAb) and Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) at Month 36
Time Frame: Month 36
BAbs are all antibodies which are capable of binding to the investigational drug molecule (RNF) irrespective of their binding site. NAbs are defined as a subgroup of BAbs which bind to the active sites of the RNF and therefore neutralize its potency. NAbs were detected using a viral cytopathic assay. BAbs were measured by using an ELISA (Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay).
Month 36
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: Month 24 up to Month 36 (DB treatment period for study 28981 (REFLEXION)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, or diseases that emerges or worsens relative to baseline during a clinical study with an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), regardless of causal relationship and even if no IMP has been administered. SAE: Any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition.
Month 24 up to Month 36 (DB treatment period for study 28981 (REFLEXION)
Time to Conversion to Clinically Definite Multiple Sclerosis (CDMS) Defined by Either a Second Attack or a Sustained Increase (Greater Than or Equal to 1.5 Points) in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score up to Month 60
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to 60 Months
CDMS was defined by the occurrence of a second attack or relapse over 60 months in participants who presented with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) accompanied by an abnormal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan. EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis [MS]) was calculated. Time to conversion to CDMS was represented by Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative percentage (%) of participants with CDMS.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to 60 Months
Time to Confirmed Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Progression up to 60 Months
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to 60 Months
EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. A confirmed EDSS progression was defined EDSS greater than or equal to 1.0 point confirmed during a visit performed 6 months later. Time to confirmed EDSS progression was represented by Kaplan-Meier estimates of the cumulative percentage (%) of participants with confirmed EDSS progression.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025) up to 60 Months
Number of Combined Unique Active (CUA) Lesions, New Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesions, New Gadolinium Enhanced (Gd+) Lesions and New T1 Lesions Per Participant Per Scan at Month 60
Time Frame: Month 60
Number of CUA lesions, new T2 lesions, new Gd+ Lesions and new T1 lesions were measured by using MRI scans.
Month 60
Change From Baseline in Time Constant 1 (T1) Hypointense Volume, and Time Constant 2 (T2) Lesion Volume at Month 60
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
Change from baseline in lesion volume was measured by using MRI scans for T1 hypointense lesions and T2 lesions.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
Percent Change From Baseline in Brain Volume at Month 60
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
Percent Change in brain volume was measured by using MRI scans.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
Percentage of Participants With Conversion to McDonald Multiple Sclerosis (MS) at Month 60
Time Frame: Month 60
The McDonald criteria use dissemination in time and space established by MRI findings to provide a clinical diagnosis for MS. Dissemination in time is established by a new T2 or Gd+ lesion found on a repeat MRI. Dissemination in space is established by the presence of any 3 of the following: 1 Gd+ lesion or 9 T2 bright lesions if there is no enhancement; greater than or equal to 1 infratentorial lesion; greater than or equal to 1 juxtacortical lesion; greater than or equal to 3 periventricular lesions.
Month 60
Change From Baseline in Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test 3 (PASAT-3) Score at Month 60
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
The PASAT is a measure of cognitive function that specifically assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. Score ranges from '0-60'. Higher scores reflect better neurological function and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
Percentage of Relapse-Free Participants at Month 60
Time Frame: Month 60
A relapse was defined as the development of new or the exacerbation of existing neurological symptoms or signs, in the absence of fever, lasting for 24 hours and with a previous period for more than 30 days with a stable or an improving condition.
Month 60
Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score at Month 60
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
EDSS assesses disability in 8 functional systems. An overall score ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS) was calculated. The change in EDSS score at Month 60 was calculated as EDSS score at Month 60 minus EDSS score at baseline.
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
Change From Baseline in Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) Score at Month 60
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
The MSFC is a multidimensional clinical outcome measure which consists of three sub-tests; Timed 25-Foot Walk, 9-Hole Peg Test and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3(PASAT-3). The Timed 25-Foot Walk is a quantitative measure of lower extremity function. The 9-Hole Peg Test is a quantitative measure of upper extremity (arm and hand) function. The PASAT is a measure of cognitive function that specifically assesses auditory information processing speed and flexibility, as well as calculation ability. Standardized results (Z-scores) of these sub-tests and the overall MSFC Z-score as an average of these three Z-scores was calculated. Higher Z-scores reflect better neurological function and a positive change from baseline indicates improvement. An increase in score indicates an improvement (range -3 to +3).
Baseline (Day 1 of Study 27025), Month 60
Numbers of Participants With Binding Antibodies (BAb) and Neutralizing Antibody (NAb) at Month 60
Time Frame: Month 60
BAbs are all antibodies which are capable of binding to the RNF irrespective of their binding site. NAbs are defined as a subgroup of BAbs which bind to the active sites of the RNF and therefore neutralize its potency. NAbs were detected using a viral cytopathic assay. BAbs were measured by using an ELISA.
Month 60
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and AEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: Month 24 up to Month 60
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in the form of signs, symptoms, abnormal laboratory findings, or diseases that emerges or worsens relative to baseline during a clinical study with an Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), regardless of causal relationship and even if no IMP has been administered. SAE: Any AE that resulted in death; was life threatening; resulted in persistent/significant disability/incapacity; resulted in/prolonged an existing in-patient hospitalization; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or was a medically important condition.
Month 24 up to Month 60

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Responsible, Merck Serono S.A., Geneva

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

December 23, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on RNF

3
Subscribe