Breathe for Hot Flashes Randomized Controlled Trial

February 24, 2016 updated by: Indiana University

Breathe-intervention for Hot Flashes, Associated Outcomes, and Interference

Background: Paced respiration has been internationally recommended for vasomotor symptom management despite limited empirical evidence.

Objective: To evaluate efficacy of a paced respiration intervention against a sham comparator breathing control and usual care control for vasomotor and other menopausal symptoms.

Design: A 16-week, 3-group, partially blinded, controlled trial with 2:2:1 randomization and stratification by group (breast cancer, no cancer), Midwestern city and surrounding area.

Participants: 218 randomized women (96 breast cancer survivors, 122 menopausal women without cancer) recruited through community mailings and registries.

Interventions: Training, home practice support, and instructions to use the breathing at the time of each hot flash were delivered via compact disc with printed booklet (paced respiration intervention) or digital videodisc with printed booklet (fast shallow breathing control). Usual care control received a letter regarding group assignment.

Main Measures: Hot flash frequency, severity, and bother (primary), hot flash interference in daily life, perceived control over hot flashes, and mood and sleep disturbances (secondary). Intervention performance, adherence, and adverse events were assessed.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

218

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Indiana University School of Nursing

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years of age
  • Reporting daily hot flashes and desirous of hot flash treatment
  • Peri- or post menopausal
  • Living within a 60-mile radius of Indianapolis or willing to drive to the center for all study visits
  • Able to read, write, and speak English
  • in good general health

In addition:

  • Breast Cancer survivors will have a known diagnosis of non-metastatic disease
  • No history of other cancers
  • Be at least four weeks post-completion of surgery, radiation and chemotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairments
  • Participation in our previous pilot study evaluating our control condition
  • Self-reported difficulties with normal everyday breathing
  • Meet criteria at baseline for number of subjective and/or objective hot flashes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Paced respiration
The paced respiration intervention group received a compact disc with paper booklet. The booklet reinforced instructions on the first audio track for how to accomplish a target breath rate of 6-8 breaths per minute, practice twice per day for 15 minutes, and apply the breathing at the onset of each hot flash. Women were instructed to do slow, deep, abdominal breathing in through the nose and out through the mouth as per international recommendations (4). They were also instructed to practice twice per day for 15 minutes as per the small, laboratory-based studies (5, 6). The second and third tracks contained specially composed, digitally recorded music to help entrain the breath rate and structure the length of practice.
Breathing exercise
Sham Comparator: Sham comparator: Fast, shallow breathing
The sham comparator group received a digital videodisc with paper booklet. The booklet reinforced voice-over and video demonstration to practice twice per day and apply the fast shallow breathing at the onset of each flash. A previously published report provides additional details and data indicating this program was a suitable attention control.
sham breathing exercise
No Intervention: Control: Usual Care
The usual care group received an investigator-signed letter explaining they were not selected to receive any study materials during the 16-week follow-up. These participants received paced respiration materials by mail after study completion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hot Flash Frequency
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Prospective, real-time electronic diary used by participants for a minimum of 24 hours to a maximum of 7 days. Duration of use was determined by participant choice.
16 weeks
Hot Flash Severity
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Self-reported rating using a scale from 0 (not at all severe) to 10 (extremely severe). Calculated as 24 hour averages at 16 week timepoint.
16 weeks
Hot Flash Bother
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Self-reported rating using a scale from 0 (not at all bothersome) to 10 (extremely bothersome). Calculated as 24 hour averages at 16 week timepoint.
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hot Flash Related Daily Interference
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Self-report using well-validated, standardized questionnaire. Subject rated interference on scale items from 0 to 10. Total score range was 0-100 with higher scores indicating greater interference with daily life.
16 weeks
Perceived Control Over Hot Flashes
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Self-report using well-validated, standardized questionnaire composed of 15 items with response option ratings of 1-4. Scores were summed with potential range of 15-60. Lower scores indicated less control over hot flashes; higher scores indicate higher perceived control over hot flashes.
16 weeks
Mood Disturbance
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Self-report using the well-validated Profile of Mood States-Short Form questionnaire. Six subscales are computed. Total scores are computed using the formula Depression-Dejection + Tension-Anxiety + Anger-Hostility + Fatigue-Inertia + Confusion-Bewilderment + (24 - Vigor-Activity). Total scores range from 0 to 124 with higher scores indicating higher mood disturbance.
16 weeks
Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Self-report using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index which is composed of 19-items to assess sleep quality and disturbances during the past week. Scores range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality and more sleep disturbance.
16 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intervention Performance
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Physiological recordings of number of breaths per minute to verify correct performance of paced respiration for this participant group only. Assessment was conducted in a single visit scheduled 2 weeks post-randomization for the paced respiration group.
2 weeks
Intervention Performance
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Physiological recordings of number of breaths per minute to verify correct performance of paced respiration for this participant group only. Assessment was conducted at the week 16 post-randomization timepoint.
16 weeks
Intervention Adherence
Time Frame: 16 weeks
Number of breathing practice sessions per participant over the 16 week study period.
16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Janet S Carpenter, PhD, RN, Indiana University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 8, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 24, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0803-13
  • R01CA132927 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data available upon request.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hot Flashes

Clinical Trials on Paced respiration

3
Subscribe