Long-Term Effects of Aortic Valve Mismatch

June 20, 2014 updated by: University Hospital, Strasbourg, France

Long-Term Effects of Aortic Valve Mismatch on Functional Ability and Remodeling the Left Ventricular After Aortic Valve Replacement Mechanics

The real impact of the existence of an aortic valve mismatch after aortic valve replacement in various studies conducted so far is a source of controversy. There is currently no long-term impact of the aortic valve mismatch on the reversal of left ventricular remodeling and its impact functional.To evaluate these effects of aortic valve mismatch on abilities to the effort, the quality of life and the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy long term after a aortic valve replacement, conducting a new study is fundamental. This study is even more essential in patients with a young life expectancy theoretical long and physical activity.Our study aims to determine whether the existence of an aortic valve mismatch has an influence on: The functional capacity to the effort by measuring the maximum oxygen consumption during a stress test (VO2 max) The reversal of left ventricular remodeling (cardiac ultrasound doppler), diastolic dysfunction (cardiac ultrasound and Doppler measurement Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP). This study will analyse these data in patients who received youth a VAN by mechanical aortic valve prosthesis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

77

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Strasbourg, France
        • CHRU, Nouvel Hôpital Civil, Service de chirurgie cardio-vasculaire

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient major ≤ 60 years at the time of the aortic valve replacement.
  • Patient affiliated with a social security
  • Consent dated and signed by the investigator and the subject
  • Subject having been informed of the results of the visit prior aortic valve replacement by mechanical prosthesis for pure aortic narrowing.
  • Fraction left ventricular ejection ≥ 50%, when aortic valve replacement and at the time of inclusion.
  • Aortic insufficiency at aortic valve replacement associated <II / IV.
  • aortic valve replacement exclusive (no gestures associated: coronary bypass, enlargement of the ring, another valve surgery,…).
  • Coronarography normal at the aortic valve replacement.
  • Normal renal function.
  • No history of heart failure episode in the previous month inclusion.
  • No indication against a stress test on bicycle ergometric

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the patient to be included in the study.
  • History of cardiac surgery under extra body movement before and / or after the aortic valve replacement.
  • Aortic insufficiency associated with the time of the transaction> II / IV.
  • Chronic respiratory insufficiency.
  • Track cancer or cancer evolving.
  • Evolutionary Osteoarthritis of the lower limbs or widespread.
  • Myopathy device.
  • Alteration higher making it impossible to carry out the test effort and response to the questionnaire on the quality of life.
  • Coronaropathy documented.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group with MVA
subjects are asked to exercise 20 or 30 minutes.
Other: group without MVA
subjects are asked to exercise during 20 or 30 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
variations in VO2 max during an effort
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Study the impact of a MVA after RVA by mechanical prosthesis
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Petit-Eisenmann Hélène, MD, Not Affiliated

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 23, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on THE LEFT VENTRICULAR REMODELING AFTER MECHANICAL AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT

Clinical Trials on exercise training

3
Subscribe