Mismatched Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Relapsed Disease Following Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies who suffer a relapse of their disease post-transplant have limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. With the exception of patients with chronic leukemias who may achieve prolonged remissions after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs), treatments using either chemotherapy or a DLI achieve less than a 10% median survival beyond 6 months. Most of these patients die of progressive leukemia, underlying the need for new therapeutic approaches.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched DLIs appear to possess a more potent graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. However, when given after an HLA-mismatched transplant DLIs have a high risk of causing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), which can be severe. To reduce the risk of GvHD, infusions of mismatched lymphocytes from an alternative donor may be used to avoid permanent engraftment and associated risk of GvHD.

In this study, we propose to use a novel strategy to treat leukemias relapsing after HLA matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation by using haplo-identical DLIs to promote the associated antileukemic effect while minimizing the possibility of permanent engraftment and associated GvHD. To achieve only temporary engraftment and to promote disease control we will give fludarabine immunosuppression prior to the DLI. We anticipate the infusion of HLA-mismatched donor lymphocytes in this setting will produce no detectible engraftment or only temporary engraftment, but may result in a strong GvL effect regardless of engraftment outcome. We will select patients for this protocol who fall into the worst category for post-transplant relapse. Specifically, we will enroll patients with acute leukemia or MDS relapsing within 6 months of transplant, of which less than 5% survive beyond a year from relapse.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies who suffer a relapse of their disease post-transplant have limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. With the exception of patients with chronic leukemias who may achieve prolonged remissions after donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs), treatments using either chemotherapy or a DLI achieve less than a 10% median survival beyond 6 months. Most of these patients die of progressive leukemia, underlying the need for new therapeutic approaches.

HLA-mismatched DLIs appear to possess a more potent graft-versus-leukemia (GvL) effect. However, when given after an HLA-mismatched transplant DLIs have a high risk of causing graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), which can be severe. To reduce the risk of GvHD, infusions of mismatched lymphocytes from an alternative donor may be used to avoid permanent engraftment and associated risk of GvHD.

In this study, we propose to use a novel strategy to treat leukemias relapsing after HLA matched allogeneic stem cell transplantation by using haplo-identical DLIs to promote the associated antileukemic effect while minimizing the possibility of permanent engraftment and associated GvHD. To achieve only temporary engraftment and to promote disease control we will give fludarabine immunosuppression prior to the DLI. We anticipate the infusion of HLA-mismatched donor lymphocytes in this setting will produce no detectible engraftment or only temporary engraftment, but may result in a strong GvL effect regardless of engraftment outcome. We will select patients for this protocol who fall into the worst category for post-transplant relapse. Specifically, we will enroll patients with acute leukemia or MDS relapsing within 6 months of transplant, of which less than 5% survive beyond a year from relapse.

The primary objective of this phase II clinical trial will be to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a non-engraftment model and a lymphocytes infusion from a haplo-identical donor to treat relapsed disease following matched sibling stem cell transplantation in subjects who are not candidates for alternative treatment options.

We therefore propose this is a phase II clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of an infusion of unmanipulated lymphocytes from a haplo-identical donor in subjects with relapsed disease following matched sibling stem cell transplantation who are not candidates for alternative treatment options.

The primary endpoint of this phase 2 study is survival at 6 month post-relapse of disease. Successful outcome of the study will be a survival of 100% greater than the National Heart Lung and Blood (NHLBI) historical 25% at 6-months.

Secondary endpoints will include: incidence and severity of induced GvHD, proportion of DLI engraftment, peak chimerism, leukemia response at 21 days post DLI, residual leukemia measured by patient chimerism, leukemia free survival from date relapse, and safety of the mismatched DLI procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20852
        • National Institutes of Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 75 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

  • ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA:

Inclusion Criteria- Recipient:

  1. Diagnosed with one of the following hematological conditions:

    • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) of any subtype or
    • Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) of any subtype or
    • Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) of any subtype or
    • Blastic phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML)
  2. Relapsed disease within 6 months of matched sibling allogeneic stem cell transplant procedure
  3. Evaluation for protocol within 8 weeks of relapse and enrollment within 12 weeks or relapse
  4. 8-75 years of age
  5. Availability of previous HLA identical (6/6) related donor (ages 8 to 17 must have previously donated bone marrow [not peripheral blood]
  6. At least one haploidentical (1-3 antigen mismatched) related donor available for apheresis

Exclusion Criteria Recipient (any of the following):

  1. Active grade II-IV Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD)
  2. Extensive chronic Graft vs. Host Disease (GvHD)
  3. Post-transplant donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) from original donor within 1 month of protocol enrollment.
  4. Progressive disease despite post-relapse chemo or monoclonal therapy.
  5. Co-morbidity of such severity that it would preclude the patients ability to tolerate protocol therapy.
  6. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) greater than 10 x ULN (grade 3, CTCAE).
  7. Bilirubin greater than 5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) (grade 3, CTCAE).
  8. Creatinine greater than 3.5 mg/dl (grade 3, CTCAE).
  9. HIV positive (Recipients who are positive for hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV) or human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-I/II) are not excluded from participation).
  10. Positive pregnancy test for women of childbearing age.
  11. Severe psychiatric illness or mental deficiency sufficiently severe as to make compliance with the transplant treatment unlikely and informed consent impossible.

Inclusion Criteria- Stem Cell Donors:

  1. HLA-matched sibling stem cell donor from the original transplant to participate in a stem cell rescue only in the setting of severe, refractory GvHD caused by the haploidentical cells.
  2. Related HLA haplo-identical (1-3 A, B or DR antigens mismatched with recipient). To maximize the GvL that is associated with HLA disparity, the haploidentical donor will be chosen based on the greatest HLA mismatch (preference: 3/6 greater than 4/6 greater than 5/6). Parents and siblings will be considered equally.
  3. Weight greater than or equal to 18 kg
  4. Age greater than or equal to 8 or less than or equal to 80 years old.

Exclusion Criteria Stem Cell Donor (any of the following):

  1. Pregnant or lactating
  2. Unfit to receive filgrastim (G-CSF) or previous filgrastim mobilization for donors under 18 years of age.
  3. Unfit to undergo apheresis (abnormal blood counts, history of stroke, uncontrolled hypertension).
  4. Sickling hemoglobinopathies such as HbSS or HbSC.
  5. HIV positive. Donors who are positive for hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV), human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-I/II), or T.cruzi (Chagas) will be used at the discretion of the investigator following counseling and approval from the recipient.
  6. Severe psychiatric illness or mental deficiency sufficiently severe as to make compliance with the donation of stem cells unlikely and/or informed consent impossible.

Inclusion criteria- Haplo Lymphocyte Donors:

  1. Related HLA haplo-identical (1-3 A, B or DR antigens mismatched with recipient). To maximize the GvL that is associated with HLA disparity, the haploidentical donor will be chosen based on the greatest HLA mismatch (preference: 3/6 greater than 4/6 greater than 5/6). Donors age less than 80 years required, and parents and siblings will be considered equally.
  2. Age greater than or equal to 18 or less than or equal to 80 years old.

Exclusion Criteria Haplo Lymphocyte Donor (any of the following):

  1. Pregnant or lactating
  2. Unfit to undergo apheresis (abnormal blood counts, history of stroke, uncontrolled hypertension).
  3. Sickling hemoglobinopathies such as HbSS and HbSC .
  4. HIV positive. Donors who are positive for hepatitis B (HBV), hepatitis C (HCV) or human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-I/II), or T.cruzi (Chagas) will be used at the discretion of the investigator following counseling and approval from the recipient.
  5. Severe psychiatric illness or mental deficiency sufficiently severe as to make compliance with the donation of stem cells unlikely and/or informed consent impossible

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Miltenyi Magnetic cell sorter for CD3

Miltenyi Magnetic cell sorter device will be used for CD3 selection of granulocyte colony stimulating factor mobilized allogeneic PBSCT. In stage 1, subjects will receive 1 x 10 to the eight power CD3 cells/kg. In stage II, the dose of CD3+ cells will be increased to 2 x 10 to the eight power cells/kg.

This phase II clinical trial is designed to evaluate a novel non-myeloablative but highly immunosuppressive disease specific conditioning regimen and infusion of unmanipulated lymphocytes from a haplo-identical familial donor in subjects with relapsed disease following matched sibling stem cell transplantation who are not candidates for alternative treatment options. The clinical trial will evaluate recipient survival at six months post-relapse of disease.

Receipts will receive 1 x 10 to eighth power CD3 cells/kg of familial haploidentical positively selected cluster of differentiation 34 (CD34)+ stem cells from the same DLI donor.
Other Names:
  • CliniMACS Miltenyi

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Recipient Survival at 6-month Post-relapse of Disease
Time Frame: 6 months post-relapse of disease
This phase II clinical trial is designed to evaluate a novel non-myeloablative but highly immunosuppressive disease specific conditioning regimen and infusion of unmanipulated lymphocytes from a haplo-identical familial donor in subjects with relapsed disease following matched sibling stem cell transplantation who are not candidates for alternative treatment options. The clinical trial will evaluate recipient survival at six months post-relapse of disease.
6 months post-relapse of disease

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Developed of Acute GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months post disease relapse
Overall number incidences of participants who developed Acute Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD).
6 months post disease relapse
Number of Participants Who Developed Grade I, Acute GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months post disease relapse

Number of participants who developed Grade I, Acute Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD) as defined by CIMBTR criteria for Organ Stages of Acute GVHD.

Grade 1 is defined as: Skin = Maculopapular rash< 25% of body surface area (BSA); Liver = Total Bilirubin 2-3 mg/dL; Lower GI = stool output/day is 500-999 mL/day.

Grade I GVHD is characterized as mild disease, grade II GVHD as moderate, grade III as severe, and grade IV life-threatening.

6 months post disease relapse
Number of Participants Who Developed Grade II, Acute GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months post disease relapse

Number of participants who developed Grade II, Acute Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD) as defined by CIMBTR criteria for Organ Stages of Acute GVHD.

Stage II Acute GVHD: Skin - rash on 25-50 percent body surface area; Liver - Total Bilirubin 3.1-6.0 mg/dL; Lower GI - Diarrhea 1001-1500 mL/day.

Grade I GVHD is characterized as mild disease, grade II GVHD as moderate, grade III as severe, and grade IV life-threatening.

6 months post disease relapse
Number of Participants Who Developed Grade III, Acute GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months post disease relapse

Number of participants who developed Grade III, Acute Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD) as defined by CIMBTR criteria for Organ Stages of Acute GVHD.

Stage III Acute GVHD: Skin - Rash on >50% of body surface; Liver - Total Bilirubin 6.1 - 15.0 mg/dL; Lower GI - Diarrhea > 1500 mL/day Grade I GVHD is characterized as mild disease, grade II GVHD as moderate, grade III as severe, and grade IV life-threatening.

6 months post disease relapse
Number of Participants Who Developed of Grade IV, Acute GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months post disease relapse

Number of participants who developed Grade IV, Acute Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD) as defined by CIMBTR criteria for Organ Stages of Acute GVHD.

Grade IV, Acute GVHD is defined as: Skin = Generalized erythroderma plus bullous formation; Liver = Total Bilirubin >15 mg/dL; Lower GI = Severe abdominal pain with or without ileus.

Grade I GVHD is characterized as mild disease, grade II GVHD as moderate, grade III as severe, and grade IV life-threatening.

6 months post disease relapse
Number of Participants Who Developed Chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months post disease relapse

Number of incidences of participants who developed Chronic Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD). Moderate GVHD is 3 or more organs with score 1, any organ with score 2, or lung with score 1, and usually requires systemic immune-suppressive treatment. Mild disease is associated with a good prognosis whereas severe disease is associated with higher treatment-related mortality and lower survival.

Organs are scored on a 0 to 3 scale from no involvement/no symptoms to severe functional compromise.

6 months post disease relapse
Number of Participants Who Developed Limited Chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months post disease relapse
Number of participants who developed Limited Chronic Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD). Limited chronic GVHD is defined as GVHD occurring after day 100 that involved localized skin and/or mouth and/or liver.
6 months post disease relapse
Number of Participants With Extensive, Chronic GVHD
Time Frame: 6 months post disease relapse
Number of participants with extensive, Chronic Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD). Extensive chronic GVHD is defined as GVHD occurring after day 100 that did not meet the definition of limited chronic GVHD.
6 months post disease relapse
Number of Participants With CD3+ Engraftment Who Achieved Peak Chimerism Post DLI
Time Frame: 21 Days
Number of Participants with CD3+ Engraftment who Achieved Peak Chimerism post Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI)
21 Days
Number of Subjects Leukemia Response After Donor Lymphocyte Infusion (DLI)
Time Frame: 21 days
Subjects experience leukemia response after partially human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched DLI according to International Working Group criteria
21 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Minoo Battiwalla, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 10, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 7, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

Clinical Trials on Miltenyi Magnetic cell sorter for CD3

3
Subscribe