- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00892008
A Post Marketing Surveillance Study On Pregabalin (Lyrica) On Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin (PAINS)
January 21, 2021 updated by: Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Pregabalin (Lyrica) Action In Neuropathic Pain Syndrome (PAINS): A Post Marketing Surveillance Study On Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin
This study is being conducted as a regulatory requirement post initial marketing authorization.
This is primarily a safety study.
This was an open label study and patients were enrolled once the decision to prescribe the medication was made by the Investigator.
Study Overview
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
2278
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Male or female, 18 years and above diagnosed with neuropathic pain.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female, 18 years old and above diagnosed with neuropathic pain.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that are pregnant and lactating; and patients with known hypersensitivity to pregabalin or its related components.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Open-Label
This study was open-label with only one treatment group.
Pregabalin was prescribed in accordance with usual clinical practice.
|
Pregabalin 75-150 mg BID for at least 2 weeks.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)
Time Frame: Baseline through Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Number and severity of adverse events, including serious adverse events.
If the same subject had more than one occurance in the same preferred term event category, only the most severe occurrence was taken.
|
Baseline through Final Visit (Week 4)
|
|
Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Discontinuations due to adverse events by MedDRA system organ class and preferred term.
|
Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Change from Baseline in 10 cm VAS pain score; 10-point pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain.
Change = scores at second visit and final visit minus score at Baseline.
|
Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
|
VAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2)
|
VAS Pain Score: 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain.
Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Second Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline.
Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit .
|
Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2)
|
|
VAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Week 4)
|
VAS Pain Score 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain.
Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline.
Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit.
|
Baseline, Final Visit (Week 4)
|
|
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Physician's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction.
Treatment satisfaction item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete score points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
|
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
|
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Patient's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction.
Treatment satisfaction item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
|
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
|
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Physician's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy.
Efficacy item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
|
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
|
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Patient's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy.
Efficacy item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
|
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
|
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Physician's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability.
Tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
|
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
|
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Patient's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability.
The tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor.
Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Abbreviation: vst = visit.
|
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2008
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 30, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 30, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
May 1, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 25, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 21, 2021
Last Verified
January 1, 2010
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Neuromuscular Diseases
- Peripheral Nervous System Diseases
- Neuralgia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- Anticonvulsants
- Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents
- Calcium Channel Blockers
- Pregabalin
Other Study ID Numbers
- A0081094
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain
-
Unity Health TorontoRecruitingChronic Neuropathic PainCanada
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandFondation ApicilCompletedNeuropathic Traumatic Pain | Pain NRS ≥ 4 | Peripheral Neuropathic Pain | Neuropathic Pain Diagnostic Questionnaire (DN4) ≥ 4France
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...CompletedPostherpetic Neuralgia (PHN) | Chemotherapy Induced Neuropathic Pain | Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain (DPN) | HIV-related Neuropathic Pain (HIV)Colombia, Mexico, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela
-
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileNot yet recruiting
-
Poitiers University HospitalRecruitingChronic Neuropathic PainFrance
-
Eli Lilly and CompanyRecruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainUnited States, Puerto Rico
-
Shandong Suncadia Medicine Co., Ltd.RecruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainChina
-
Shanghai Yidian Pharmaceutical Technology Development...Not yet recruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain
-
Ente Ospedaliero Ospedali GallieraCompletedNeuropathic Pain in CancerItaly
-
University Hospital, Strasbourg, FranceTerminatedPostthoracotomy Pain | Postthoracoscopy Neuropathic PainFrance
Clinical Trials on Pregabalin
-
South Egypt Cancer InstituteNot yet recruiting
-
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris...Completed
-
Chattogram International Dental CollegeRecruitingPost Endodontic Pain | Mechanical Detection Threshold | Mechanical Pain Threshold | Mechanical Pain SensitivityBangladesh
-
Hawler Medical UniversityCompletedDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)Iraq
-
AstraZenecaCompletedDiabetic Neuropathy, Painful; Diabetic NeuropathiesUnited States
-
Jiangsu HengRui Medicine Co., Ltd.UnknownPostherpetic NeuralgiaChina
-
Shandong Suncadia Medicine Co., Ltd.RecruitingDiabetic Peripheral Neuropathic PainChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalBeijing Ditan Hospital; Beijing Sanbo Brain HospitalRecruitingFibromyalgia | Pregabalin | EsketamineChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalPeople's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region; Sichuan Provincial People...Not yet recruitingPain | Fibromyalgia | PregabalinChina
-
Hamilton Health Sciences CorporationMcMaster UniversityTerminated