A Post Marketing Surveillance Study On Pregabalin (Lyrica) On Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin (PAINS)

Pregabalin (Lyrica) Action In Neuropathic Pain Syndrome (PAINS): A Post Marketing Surveillance Study On Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Of Pregabalin

This study is being conducted as a regulatory requirement post initial marketing authorization. This is primarily a safety study. This was an open label study and patients were enrolled once the decision to prescribe the medication was made by the Investigator.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2278

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male or female, 18 years and above diagnosed with neuropathic pain.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female, 18 years old and above diagnosed with neuropathic pain.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that are pregnant and lactating; and patients with known hypersensitivity to pregabalin or its related components.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Open-Label
This study was open-label with only one treatment group. Pregabalin was prescribed in accordance with usual clinical practice.
Pregabalin 75-150 mg BID for at least 2 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Lyrica

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and Severity of Adverse Events (All Causalities); Baseline to Final Visit (Week 4)
Time Frame: Baseline through Final Visit (Week 4)
Number and severity of adverse events, including serious adverse events. If the same subject had more than one occurance in the same preferred term event category, only the most severe occurrence was taken.
Baseline through Final Visit (Week 4)
Discontinuations Due to Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Discontinuations due to adverse events by MedDRA system organ class and preferred term.
Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Change from Baseline in 10 cm VAS pain score; 10-point pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Change = scores at second visit and final visit minus score at Baseline.
Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
VAS Pain Score at Baseline (BL) and Second Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2)
VAS Pain Score: 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Second Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline. Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit .
Baseline, Second Visit (Week ≥ 2)
VAS Pain Score at Baseline and Final Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, Final Visit (Week 4)
VAS Pain Score 10 cm (10-point) pain intensity ordinal rating system: 0 = no pain, 1-3 = mild pain, 4-6 = moderate pain, 7-9 = severe pain, 10 = worst possible pain. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each pain intensity rating at Baseline. Abbreviations: mod = moderate, sev = severe, wrst = worst, poss = possible, pn = pain, vst = visit.
Baseline, Final Visit (Week 4)
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Physician's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete score points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Treatment Satisfaction at the Second and Final Visits
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Patient's Clinical Global Impression of treatment satisfaction. Treatment satisfaction item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Physician's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy. Efficacy item of the CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Efficacy at Second and Final Visit
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Patient's Clinical Global Impression of efficacy. Efficacy item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Physician's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) on Tolerability at Second and Final Viist
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Physician's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability. Tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit.
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Patient's Clinical Global Impression (CGI) of Tolerability at Second and Final Visit
Time Frame: Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)
Patient's Clinical Global Impression of tolerability. The tolerability item of CGI has a scale of five discrete points: excellent, very good, good, fair and poor. Shift table shows the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Final Visit by the number of subjects with each score point rating at the Second Visit. Abbreviation: vst = visit.
Second Visit (Week ≥ 2), Final Visit (Week 4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 30, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

May 1, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuropathic Pain

Clinical Trials on Pregabalin

3
Subscribe