Optimizing Local Anesthetic Concentration for Continuous Lumbar Plexus Nerve Blocks

February 18, 2021 updated by: Brian M. Ilfeld, MD, MS, University of California, San Diego
This is a research study to determine if the concentration of local anesthetic through a catheter next to the nerves that go to the hip that is undergoing surgery, affects muscle strength and sense of touch experienced after surgery. This study is looking at the varying concentrations of local anesthetic placed through the catheter.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

These results will help define the optimal concentration of local anesthetic used for continuous peripheral nerve blocks and help guide future research in this clinically-relevant area.

This investigation will be a randomized, observer-masked, controlled, parallel-arm, human-subjects clinical trial.

Enrollment. Subjects will be patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Study inclusion will be proposed to eligible patients by the orthopedic surgery or anesthesia services or research coordinator/assistant within four weeks prior to surgery. If a patient desires study participation, written, informed consent will be obtained. Selection for inclusion will not be based on gender, race, or socioeconomic status. The study population of interest includes men and women of all races and socioeconomic status.

Preoperative Management. Prior to surgery but following written, informed consent, subjects will have baseline endpoints measured. Patients will then have a perineural catheter placed on the operative side using standard techniques currently used at UCSD, and previously described. A 15 mL bolus of 2% mepivacaine with epinephrine (5 µg/mL) will be injected through the catheter to demonstrate correct catheter placement and provide intraoperative analgesia. Patients with a misplaced catheter indicated by a lack of sensory changes in the surgical extremity within 15 min will have their catheter replaced or be withdrawn from the study prior to randomization.

The remaining patients will then be randomized to one of two treatment groups: a postoperative ropivacaine concentration of 0.1% or 0.4% ("study infusate"). Randomization will be based on computer-generated codes that will be created and maintained by the Investigational Drug Service. Randomization will be in blocks of four, and stratified by hip arthroplasty procedure (either total or resurfacing). A portable electronic infusion pump with study infusate will be attached to the perineural catheter. The basal rate and patient-controlled bolus volume will depend upon the treatment group (note that the basal rate and bolus volume differ for each concentration, but the total dose of local anesthetic is the same for each):

Ropivacaine Concentration 0.1%: Basal Rate (12mL/h); Basal Dose (12 mg/h); Bolus Volume (4 mL); Bolus Dose (4 mg); Lockout Duration (30 min); Maximum Dose (20 mg/h)

Ropivacaine Concentration 0.4%: Basal Rate (3 mL/h); Basal Dose (12 mg/h); Bolus Volume (1 mL); Bolus Dose (4 mg); Lockout Duration (30 min); Maximum Dose (20 mg/h)

Intraoperative Management. Patients will receive a standardized general anesthetic with an inhaled anesthetic in N2O and O2. These gasses will be titrated for a Bispectral Index of 40-60 in order to provide adequate anesthesia while minimizing postoperative recovery duration. Esmolol and hydralazine will be used to provide hemodynamic stability, and opioids administered if necessary (fentanyl in 25 µg increments). The ropivacaine infusion provided by the Investigational Drug Service will be initiated using an infusion pump attached to the perineural catheter. Just prior to emergence, IV morphine will be titrated for a respiratory rate of 12-14. Upon emergence, patients will be taken to the recovery room and then to the surgical ward.

Postoperative Pain Management. For the duration of the study, all patients will receive the current usual and customary analgesics for hip arthroplasty patients at Hillcrest and Thornton hospitals. Perineural infusions will be administered per standard UCSD routine: continued administration until recommended discontinuation by the surgical service at which time the catheter is removed by the acute pain service.

Outcome Measurements. We have selected measures that have established reliability and validity. Staff blinded to treatment group assignment will perform all measures and assessments. Preoperative measurements (performed prior to perineural catheter placement the day of surgery): strength of the quadriceps femoris, hip adductors, and hip flexors; and sensory level (measurement descriptions below). Postoperative measurements will be performed the day following surgery as close to 8:00-9:00 and 12:30-13:30 as possible (logistics occasionally preclude therapist evaluation at these exact hours).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • UCSD Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary, unilateral hip arthroplasty
  • age greater than or equal to 18 years
  • postoperative analgesic plan includes perineural local anesthetic infusion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • morbid obesity as defined by a body mass index greater than 40
  • chronic high dose opioid use
  • history of opioid abuse
  • neuro-muscular deficit of the ipsilateral femoral nerve and/or quadriceps muscle
  • vulnerable populations i.e., children, pregnant women, or prisoners

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 0.1% Ropivicaine
Patients will be given 0.1% ropivicaine provided via infusion pump which will be attached intraoperatively and will remain connected until patient is ready to leave the hospital. In this time a physical therapist will work with the patient to assess outcome measures.
Ropivacaine 0.1% will be administered via the perineural catheter as follows: Basal Rate (12mL/h); Basal Dose (12 mg/h); Bolus Volume (4 mL); Bolus Dose (4 mg); Lockout Duration (30 min); Maximum Dose (20 mg/h)
Experimental: 0.4% Ropivicaine
Patients will be given 0.4% ropivicaine provided via infusion pump which will be attached intraoperatively and will remain connected until patient is ready to leave the hospital. In this time a physical therapist will work with the patient to assess outcome measures.
Ropivacaine 0.1% will be administered via the perineural catheter as follows: Basal Rate (3 mL/h); Basal Dose (12 mg/h); Bolus Volume (1 mL); Bolus Dose (4 mg); Lockout Duration (30 min); Maximum Dose (20 mg/h)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent Change From Baseline in Quadriceps Femoris Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC)
Time Frame: The study primary endpoint will be the difference in MVIC the morning following surgery compared with the preoperative MVIC, expressed as a percentage of the preoperative MVIC: (preop - postop ) / preop x 100.
Quadriceps femoris muscle strength evaluated using a portable, hand-held, isometric force dynamometer (MicroFET2, Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, IN) to measure the maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) in a seated position. The study primary endpoint will be the difference in MVIC the morning following surgery compared with the preoperative MVIC, expressed as a percentage of the preoperative MVIC: (preop - postop ) / preop x 100.
The study primary endpoint will be the difference in MVIC the morning following surgery compared with the preoperative MVIC, expressed as a percentage of the preoperative MVIC: (preop - postop ) / preop x 100.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ambulation 100-foot Walking Test
Time Frame: Day following surgery
The 100-foot walking test simply measures the amount of time it takes patients to ambulate 100 feet. Patients will be allowed to slow or stop and rest during the walk, but will be asked to resume walking as soon as they feel they are able to.
Day following surgery
Total Ambulation
Time Frame: Day following surgery
Patients will be allowed to slow or stop and rest during the walk, but will be asked to resume walking as soon as they feel they are able to and go as far as they comfortable walking.
Day following surgery
Percent Change From Baseline in Hip Flexion
Time Frame: Day following surgery
Evaluated in the supine position using a portable, hand-held, isometric force dynamometer (MicroFET2, Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, IN). The endpoint will be the difference the morning following surgery compared with the preoperative value, expressed as a percentage of the preoperative value: (preop - postop ) / preop x 100.
Day following surgery
Mean Resting Pain
Time Frame: Day following surgery
Pain level evaluated using a verbal rating scale of 0-10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain
Day following surgery
Average Dynamic Pain
Time Frame: Day following surgery
Pain evaluated during physical therapy using a verbal rating scale of 0-10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain
Day following surgery
Worst Dynamic Pain
Time Frame: Day following surgery
The worst pain experienced during physical therapy evaluated using a verbal rating scale of 0-10, with 0=no pain and 10=worst imaginable pain
Day following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

June 3, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Arthroplasty

Clinical Trials on 0.1% Ropivacaine

3
Subscribe