Clinical Decision Rule Validation Study to Predict Low Recurrent Risk in Patients With Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism (REVERSEII)

August 31, 2016 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

REVERSEII: Validation of the "Men and HERDOO2"- A Clinical Decision Rule to Identify Patients With "Unprovoked" Venous Thromboembolism Who Can Discontinue Anticoagulants After 6 Months of Treatment.

The main objective of this study is to verify whether a new clinical decision rule identifying patients diagnosed with unprovoked blood clots who have a low risk of recurrence can safely stop oral anticoagulant therapy after 5-7 months of treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Up to 50% of patients with a first episode of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have no identifiable cause (i.e. are unprovoked VTEs). The risk of recurrent VTE in this large group of patients with unprovoked VTE after 3-6 months of anticoagulant therapy is 5-10.8% in the year following discontinuation of oral anticoagulant therapy. One in six to one in twenty recurrences of a new VTE are fatal. Given the intermediate risks of recurrence in unselected unprovoked VTE patients, clinicians do not have clear guidance on whether to continue or discontinue anticoagulants in patients with unprovoked VTE. Recently attention has turned to the concept of risk stratification to identify subgroups of patients with unprovoked VTE who could safely discontinue oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT).

In the REVERSE I study, a clinical decision rule derivation study conducted from 2001 to 2006, we developed and internally validated the clinical decision rule "Men continue and HER DOO2" that identifies patients with a first unprovoked VTE who likely have a low risk of recurrent VTE and could safely discontinue OAT subsequent to 5-7 months of OAT. The present study will evaluate if the "Men continue and HER DOO2" rule (comprised of gender, elevated D-dimer levels, post-thrombotic signs, obesity, and older age) is safe, clinically useful, and reproducible when prospectively implemented in multiple centers and a variety of settings. If this clinical decision rule is validated, it will provide physicians with important information to allow them to more confidently identify unprovoked VTE patients at low risk of VTE recurrence who may not need to continue OAT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2779

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
        • Prince of Wales Hospital
      • Brussels, Belgium
        • CUB Hôpital Erasme
      • Quebec, Canada
        • Hopital Enfant Jesus
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H2Y9
        • CDHA-Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Hamilton Health Sciences Center
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
        • Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4G5
        • Victoria Hospital
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • Ottawa Health Research Institute
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • University Health Network
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • McGill University Health Centre
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3T 1E2
        • SMBD Jewish General Hospital
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Hopital Sacre Coeur
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • St. Mary's Hospital - CHUM
    • Saskatchewan
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 0W8
        • Saskatchewan Drug Research Institute
      • Brest, France
        • Centre hospitalier régional universitaire de Brest
      • Nirmaya, India
        • Orange Lifesciences
      • Pune, India
        • Sahyadri Speciality Hospital
      • Shefali, India
        • Shefali Centre
      • Surat, India
        • Jashvant Patel Clinic
      • Geneva, Switzerland
        • Hopitaux Universitaires de Geneve
    • California
      • Santa Monica, California, United States
        • UC Davis
    • Maine
      • Rockport, Maine, United States
        • Penobscot Bay Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705
        • Duke University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First episode of major unprovoked VTE
  • VTE objectively proven
  • VTE treated for 5-12 months with anticoagulant therapy authorized for the REVERSE II study (initial or ongoing therapy)
  • Absence of recurrent VTE during the treatment period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years of age
  • Patients who have already discontinued anticoagulant therapy
  • Patients requiring ongoing anticoagulation for reasons other than VTE
  • Being treated for a recurrent unprovoked VTE
  • Patients with high risk thrombophilia
  • patients who plan on using exogenous estrogen(OCP,HRT)if anticoagulant therapy is discontinued
  • Patients with pregnancy associated VTE
  • Geographically inaccessible for follow-up
  • Patients unable or unwilling to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1 Discontinue OAT or AAA

Patients classified as being at low risk of recurrent VTE by the "HER DOO2"rule.

If the clinical decision rule indicates that a patient is at low recurrence risk (<3% per year); anticoagulant therapy will be withdrawn and the participant will then be followed for 1 year for any VTE recurrence and/or bleeding.

Consecutive patients will have the"Men continue and HER DOO2" rule applied by the attending physician between 5 - 12 months after treatment for a first unprovoked objectively proven major VTE.

"Men continue and HER DOO2" rule: all men continue oral anticoagulants and women with 2 or more of the following features after 5-7 months of OAT should continue oral anticoagulants:1) HER - any Hyperpigmentation, Edema and Redness of either lower extremity, 2) Vidas D-dimer ≥250ug/L, 3) Obesity - BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and 4) Older age - Age ≥65 years.

Other Names:
  • Clinical Decision Rule
No Intervention: 2 Observation arm

Men and patients classified as being at high risk of recurrent VTE by the "HER DOO2"rule.

If the clinical decision rule indicates that a patient is at high recurrence risk then the decision to continue or discontinue anticoagulant therapy will be left to the discretion of physicians and patients as per current standard of care and this decision recorded. High risk patients (females classified as being at high risk of recurrent VTE by the CDR, and all males) will then be followed as an observational cohort for 1 year for any VTE recurrence and/or bleeding.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary study outcome is the incidence of adjudicated recurrent major VTE at 1 year in patients deemed by the "Men and HER DOO2" CDR to be at low risk of recurrent VTE.
Time Frame: One year
One year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Any VTE 1 year event rate in low risk patients
Time Frame: One year
One year
Major bleeding 1 year event rate in un-anticoagulated low risk patients
Time Frame: One year
One year
Major VTE 1 year event rate in high risk patients who continue anticoagulant therapy
Time Frame: One year
One year
Major VTE 1 year event rate in high risk patients who discontinue anticoagulant therapy
Time Frame: One year
One year
Major Bleeding 1 year event rate in high risk patients
Time Frame: One year
One year
Clinical utility of the rule
Time Frame: One year
One year
Inter-observer reliability of the clinical decision rule
Time Frame: One year
One year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Marc Rodger, MD, MSc, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism

Clinical Trials on Application of the"Men continue and HER DOO2" rule

3
Subscribe