Slow-SPEED-NL: Slowing Parkinson's Early Through Exercise Dosage-Netherlands (Slow-SPEED-NL)

January 15, 2024 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate the feasibility if a remotely administered smartphone app can increase the volume and intensity of physical activity in daily life in patients with isolated Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep behaviour disorder over a long period of time (24 months).

Participants will be tasked to achieve an incremental increase of daily steps (volume) and amount of minutes exercised at a certain heart rate (intensity) with respect to their own baseline level. Motivation with regards to physical activity will entirely be communicated through the study specific Slow Speed smartphone app. Primary outcomes will be compliance expressed as longitudinal change in digital measures of physical activity (step count) measured using a Fitbit smartwatch. Exploratory outcomes entail retention rate, completeness of remote digital biomarker assessments, digital prodromal motor and non-motor features of PD, blood biomarkers and brain imaging markers. Using these biomarkers, we aim to develop a composite score (prodromal load score) to estimate the total prodromal load. An international exercise study with fellow researchers in the United States and United Kingdom are currently in preparation (Slow-SPEED). Our intention is to analyse overlapping outcomes combined where possible through a meta-analysis plan, to obtain insight on (determinants of) heterogeneity in compliance and possible efficacy across subgroups

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Parkinson's Disease (PD) is the fastest growing neurodegenerative disease. Exercise beneficially effects motor symptoms and neuroplasticity in people with PD. However, disease-slowing interventions have been ineffective in clinically manifest PD, when pathology is already advanced, but could succeed in prodromal PD, when pathology is limited. People with an isolated Rapid Eye Movement (REM) sleep Behaviour Disorder (iRBD) have a high risk to develop clinically manifest PD or a related neurodegenerative disease and are therefore considered to have probable prodromal PD. This study will take an important step forward by studying the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of long-term physical activity on prodromal symptoms and disease progression in people with probable prodromal PD using a newly developed, fully remote smartphone-based app. The app is inspired by the app used in the STEPWISE trial (NCT04848077).

Objective: The goal of this clinical trial is to investigate whether a smartphone app can increase the volume and intensity of physical activity in daily life in patients with iRBD at risk of developing PD for a long period of time (24 months). The secondary aim is the potential group effect on physical fitness, digital prodromal motor- and non-motor symptoms. Thirdly, we investigate whether the intervention, prodromal motor- and non-motor symptoms can be assessed remotely in a digital, decentralized fashion. Fourthly, we aim to investigate the effect on imaging- and fluid biomarkers to identify markers for prodromal progression. Using these biomarkers, we aim to develop a composite score (prodromal load score) to estimate the total prodromal load.

The anticipated fluid biomarkers outcomes are subject to potential alterations in the event of the development and implementation of novel techniques and/or biomarkers during the course of this study.

Study design: Double-blind randomized controlled trial

Study population: A total of 110 Dutch patients with iRBD (ICSD-3 criteria) aged 50 years and older, who are in possession of a suitable smartphone without mobility hampering conditions and absence of cognitive impairment which impedes usage of a smartphone will be recruited

Intervention: Participants will be randomized to a group and will be motivated to increase the volume and intensity of physical activity based on their own baseline level. The groups differ in the amount of physical activity that they are tasked to achieve.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

110

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Gelderland
      • Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525 GA
        • Recruiting
        • Radboud University Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • previously diagnosed with iRBD meeting the following criteria according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders (ICSD-3)
  • able to understand the Dutch language
  • being able to walk independently inside the home without the use of a walking aid
  • equal to or less than 120 minutes of sports/outdoor activities per day (question 5-28 LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ))
  • less than an average 7,000 steps/day during the 4-week eligibility and baseline period
  • in possession of a suitable smartphone compatible with the Slow-SPEED app, the Fitbit app and the Roche PD Mobile application v2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • clinically diagnosed or self-reported diagnosis neurodegenerative disease;
  • self-reported weekly falls in the previous 3 months;
  • dexterity problems or cognitive impairments hampering smartphone use;
  • if they do not wish to be informed about an increased risk of developing diseases associated with iRBD
  • if individual is not community-dwelling

Exclusion criteria for MRI only:

  • history of epilepsy, structural brain abnormalities (i.e. stroke, traumatic defects, large arachnoid cysts) or brain surgery
  • claustrophobia
  • implanted electrical devices (i.e. pacemaker, deep-brain stimulator (DBS), neurostimulator)
  • metal implants (such as prosthetics, ossicle prosthesis, metal plates or other non-removable metal part) or metal splinters
  • pregnancy
  • fear for incidental finding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
Large proportional increase in step count and minutes exerting moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) relative to baseline level.
A motivational smartphone application will be available for all participants using their own smartphone: the Slow-SPEED app. The Slow-SPEED app will motivate participants to increase the volume and intensity of their physical activity in daily life over a long period of time (2 years) based on their own baseline levels. Different treatment arms will receive different physical activity goals. The app offers participants feedback and support, that will stimulate them to reach their individual physical activity goal (i.e. incremental relative increase of step count and minutes exerting ≥ 64% of maximum heart rate reflecting MVPA relative to baseline level.).
Active Comparator: Active control
Small proportional increase in step count and minute exerting moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) relative to baseline level.
A motivational smartphone application will be available for all participants using their own smartphone: the Slow-SPEED app. The Slow-SPEED app will motivate participants to increase the volume and intensity of their physical activity in daily life over a long period of time (2 years) based on their own baseline levels. Different treatment arms will receive different physical activity goals. The app offers participants feedback and support, that will stimulate them to reach their individual physical activity goal (i.e. incremental relative increase of step count and minutes exerting ≥ 64% of maximum heart rate reflecting MVPA relative to baseline level.).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean change in step count per day
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Mean change in step count per day as measured continuously with a smartwatch. Mean steps per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher positive change in step count indicate more volume of physical activity.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of physical activity prior to study (LAPAQ)
Time Frame: Week -4
Question 5-28 Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam Physical Activity Questionnaire (LAPAQ). Every question is scored from 0-5, which respectively correspond to 0, 1-15, 16-30, 31-60, 61-120 en >120 minutes per day. Higher LAPAQ indicate more activity.
Week -4
Change in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) per day
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in amount of minutes exerting (minimally) ≥ 64% of maximum heart rate, reflecting moderate intense physical activity, measured continuously using a smartwatch. Mean minutes per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher positive change in minutes of MVPA indicate more aerobic physical activity.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in resting heart rate (physical fitness)
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in resting heart rate per day as measured continuously with a smartwatch. Mean resting heart rate per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher negative change (i.e. lower resting heart rate) indicate better function.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in heart rate variability (physical fitness)
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in heart rate variability in Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD) measured every 5 minutes with a smartwatch. Mean RMSSD per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher positive change in RMSSD indicate better function.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in blood pressure (physical fitness)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) blood pressure in mmHg assessed by a sphygmomanometer at follow-up (week 104). Lower scores indicate better function.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in VO2max (physical fitness)
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in VO2max in ml/kg/min measured per day with a smartwatch. Mean VO2max per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher positive change in VO2max indicate better function.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in heart rate variability (autonomic function)
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Mean change in heart rate variability in Root Mean Square of Successive Differences (RMSSD) measured every 5 minutes with a smartwatch. Mean RMSSD per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher positive change in RMSSD indicate better function.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in orthostatic blood pressure (autonomic function)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in baseline (week 0) difference between supine and standing blood pressure measured with a sphygmomanometer to follow-up (week 104). Higher change indicate more autonomic dysfunction.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in anxiety and depression (HADS)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year), week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at week 52 (1 year) and week 104 (follow-up). Range 0-42. Higher scores indicate worse function.
Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year), week 104 (follow-up)
Change in cognition (MoCA)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at week 104 (follow-up). Range 0-30. Higher scores indicate better function.
Week 0 (baseline), week 104 (follow-up)
Mean change in light sleep (sleep stage)
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Mean change in light sleep stage measured continuously with a smartwatch. Mean duration of light sleep per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher positive change indicate more light sleep.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Mean change in deep sleep (sleep stage)
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Mean change in deep sleep stage measured continuously with a smartwatch. Mean duration of deep sleep per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher positive change indicate more deep sleep.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Mean change in REM sleep (sleep stage)
Time Frame: All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Mean change in rapid eye movement (REM) sleep stage measured continuously with a smartwatch. Mean duration of REM sleep per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Higher positive change indicate more REM sleep.
All 4 week periods between and including week -4 until 0 (baseline period) and week 100 until 104 (follow-up period)
Change in self-reported sleep quality (PSQI)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year), week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at week 52 (1 year) and week 104 (follow-up). Range 0-21. Higher scores indicate worse sleep quality.
Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year), week 104 (follow-up)
Change in olfaction (UPSIT)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) at week 104 (follow-up). Range 0-40. Higher scores indicate better function.
Week 0 (baseline), week 104 (follow-up)
Change in motor symptoms (Roche PD mobile application v2)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24, week 30, week 36, week 42, week 48, week 54, week 60, week 66, week 72, week 78, week 84, week 90, week 96, week 102
Change in motor symptoms measured digitally with the smartphone using the Roche mobile PD application v2. Higher scores indicate worse function.
Week 0 (baseline), week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24, week 30, week 36, week 42, week 48, week 54, week 60, week 66, week 72, week 78, week 84, week 90, week 96, week 102
Change in metabolism (blood based biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on glucose and HbA1c at follow-up (week 104). Optional at week 26, week 52 and week 78. Lower scores indicate better metabolism.
Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in inflammation (blood based biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on Tumor Necrosis Factor-α, Interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-18, IGF-1, clusterin, Il-10, PGC-α (irisin) at follow-up (week 104). Optional at week 26, week 52 and week 78. Lower inflammatory markers indicate less inflammation. Higher anti-inflammatory markers indicate less inflammation.
Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in brain volume (imaging biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on T1 Voxel-Based-Morphometry (VBM) at follow-up (week 104). Higher scores indicate higher volume.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in white matter hyperintensities (imaging biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on FLAIR at follow-up (week 104). Higher scores indicate worse status.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in basal ganglia; cortex [1] (imaging biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on resting-state functional MRI (Rs-fMRI) at follow-up (week 104). Higher scores indicate better functional connectivity.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in basal ganglia; cortex [2] (imaging biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on task-based functional MRI at follow-up (week 104). Higher scores indicate better functional connectivity.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in substantia nigra [1] (imaging biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) at follow-up (week 104). Higher scores indicate better tissue integrity.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in substantia nigra [2] (imaging biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) at follow-up (week 104). Higher scores indicate more iron loading.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in substantia nigra [3]; locus coeruleus (imaging biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on neuromelanin at follow-up (week 104). Higher scores indicate better tissue integrity.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in instrumental activities of daily living (ADL) (functional status)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on Lawton instrumental ADL (iADL) scale at week 52 (1 year) and 104 (follow-up). Range 0-14. Higher score indicate better function.
Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in WHOQoL-BREF (quality of life)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire - BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) scale at week 52 (1 year) and 104 (follow-up). Range 0-100. Higher score indicate better quality of life.
Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in Research and Development (RAND-36)/Short Form health survey (SF-36) (quality of life)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on RAND-36/SF-36 scale at week 52 (1 year) and 104 (follow-up). Range 0-100. Higher score indicate better quality of life.
Week 0 (baseline), week 52 (1 year) and week 104 (follow-up)
System Usability (SUS)
Time Frame: week 104 (follow-up)
Usability of the Slow-SPEED-NL application assessed by the Dutch version of the System Usability Scale (SUS) at week 52 (year 1) and week 104 (follow-up). Range 0-100. Higher score indicate better usability.
week 104 (follow-up)
Barriers and motivators to engage in physical activity
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Barriers and motivators to engage in physical activity reported on a self-developed questionnaire
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in phenoconversion neurodegenerative disease
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on phenoconversion in Parkinson's Disease (PD), Lewy body dementia (LBD) and multiple system atrophy (MSA). Higher scores indicate more phenoconversion.
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in step count on a group level (compliance)
Time Frame: Week -4 until 0 (baseline) compared to week 0-26, week 26-52, week 52-78, week 78-104
Change from week -4 until 0 (baseline period) mean step count per day compared to mean step count in 6 month periods. Mean step count per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Scored as amount of participants able to increase step count per day 0-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, 76-100% relative to their own baseline measure
Week -4 until 0 (baseline) compared to week 0-26, week 26-52, week 52-78, week 78-104
Change in moderate to vigorous physical activity per day on a group level (compliance)
Time Frame: Week -4 until 0 (baseline) compared to week 0-26, week 26-52, week 52-78, week 78-104
Change from week -4 until 0 (baseline period) amount of minutes exerting (minimally) ≥ 64% of maximum heart rate in 6 month periods. Mean minutes per day will be calculated from 4-week periods. Scored as amount of participants to increase 0-25%, 26-50%, 51-75%, 76-100% relative to their own baseline measure
Week -4 until 0 (baseline) compared to week 0-26, week 26-52, week 52-78, week 78-104
Amount of completed step week goals on a group level (compliance)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Total amount of completed step count week goals
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of completed aerobic activity week goals on a group level (compliance)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Total amount of completed aerobic activity week goals
Week 0 (baseline) and week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of drop-outs on a group level (retention rate)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26, week 52, week 78, week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of drop-outs throughout the study
Week 0 (baseline), week 26, week 52, week 78, week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of interaction with Slow-SPEED app on a group level
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26, week 52, week 78, week 104 (follow-up)
Total times opening the app
Week 0 (baseline), week 26, week 52, week 78, week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of completed questionnaires on group level (completeness of digital assessments)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 52, week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of completed questionnaires
Week 0 (baseline), week 52, week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of smartwatch data points on group level (completeness of digital assessments)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26, week 52, week 78, week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of data points received for each selected smartwatch parameter
Week 0 (baseline), week 26, week 52, week 78, week 104 (follow-up)
Total smartwatch wear time on group level (completeness of digital assessments)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26, week 52, week 78, week 104 (follow-up)
Total smartwatch wear time
Week 0 (baseline), week 26, week 52, week 78, week 104 (follow-up)
Amount of Roche PD mobile application v2 data points on group level (completeness of digital assessments)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24, week 30, week 36, week 42, week 48, week 54, week 60, week 66, week 72, week 78, week 84, week 90, week 96, week 102
Amount of data points received
Week 0 (baseline), week 6, week 12, week 18, week 24, week 30, week 36, week 42, week 48, week 54, week 60, week 66, week 72, week 78, week 84, week 90, week 96, week 102
Change in growth factors (blood based biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), Growth/differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and Epidermal growth factor (EGF) at follow-up (week 104). Optional at week 26, week 52 and week 78. Higher growth factors indicate better function.
Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in ageing mechanism (blood based biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on klotho at follow-up (week 104). Optional at week 26, week 52 and week 78. High ageing marker indicate better function (i.e. less aging)
Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in pathological protein (blood based biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on α-synuclein at follow-up (week 104). Optional at week 26, week 52 and week 78. Low pathological protein indicate better function (i.e. less pathological process).
Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change in neurodegeneration (blood based biomarkers)
Time Frame: Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)
Change from baseline (week 0) on Neurofilament light (NfL) at follow-up (week 104). Optional at week 26, week 52 and week 78. Lower neurodegeneration markers indicate less neurodegeneration.
Week 0 (baseline), week 26 (optional), week 52 (optional), week 78 (optional) and week 104 (follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will make relevant anonymised data available in a database.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

We will make relevant anonymised data available in a database after publication of the main results of our trial.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who are interested in re-use of the data are asked to contact the central contact person for permission.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Diseases

Clinical Trials on Increase of physical activity volume and intensity with the use of a motivational smartphone application

3
Subscribe