Wound Healing of Incisional Wounds for Bilateral Hernia Repair

November 2, 2017 updated by: Wake Forest University

The Effect of a Sodium Bicarbonate and Hydrogen Peroxide Gel on Wound Healing of Incisional Wounds for Bilateral Hernia Repair

The purpose of this research study is to test the safety of an oxygen producing gel (produced by combining baking soda and hydrogen peroxide) and see what effects (good and bad) it has on skin incisions in children.

Baking soda and hydrogen peroxide have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but have not been approved for use in this manner.

It is hypothesized that a combination of sodium bicarbonate and hydrogen peroxide may enhance wound healing of incisional wounds for bilateral hernia repair.

Study Overview

Status

Withdrawn

Conditions

Detailed Description

Wound healing is a complex regeneration process, which is characterized by degradation and re-assembly of connective tissue and epidermal layer. The pH value within the wound-milieu influences indirectly and directly all biochemical reactions taking place in this process of healing. Interestingly, it is so far a neglected parameter for the overall outcome. For more than three decades the common assumption amongst physicians was that a low pH value, such as it is found on normal skin, is favorable for wound healing. However, investigations have shown that in fact some healing processes such as the take-rate of skin-grafts require an alkaline milieu. The matter is thus much more complicated than it was assumed.

One review drew the conclusion that wound pH is potent influential factor for the healing process and that different pH ranges are required for certain distinct phases of wound healing. Further systematic data needs to be collected for a better understanding of the pH requirements under specific circumstances. This is important as it will help to develop new pH targeted therapeutic strategies. Such shifts in the pH can be accomplished through the use of sodium biocarbonate (baking soda)

Another common agent used in wound treatments is hydrogen peroxide. It has been hypothesized that hydrogen peroxide would accelerate reepithelization and/or have a positive effect on infection. However, the results of using hydrogen peroxide alone do not appear to support this hypothesis. (Table 1)

However, one report using a combination of baking soda and hydrogen peroxide on post-surgical wound healing showed a significant increase in wound healing from oral surgery. A randomized, double-blind crossover study involving 25 patients requiring bilateral maxillary gingival flap surgery was completed. The effects of twice daily brushing with a baking soda-hydrogen peroxide dentifrice or a placebo dentifrice were observed over a 28-day post-surgical period. At days 7 and 14, soft tissue appearance/wound healing (STA) was assessed based on color and edema,. Post-surgical wound healing was statistically significantly improved at day 7 with the trend continuing to day 14 when sodium bicarbonate-hydrogen peroxide was used as compared to a control. Such materials were shown to be a possibly effective aid in the early phase of healing following gingival flap surgery. It has been determined that this combination of products may increase oxygen content to the wound sites.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
        • Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children with surgery requiring bilateral similar inguinal incisions (i.e. bilateral orchidopexy, bilateral hernia repair).

Exclusion Criteria:

None.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Hydrogen Peroxide Oxygen producing gel
On Day 0 patients will undergo bilateral inguinal surgery. One side will be dressed using a standard surgical dressing, while the other will use a combination hydrogen peroxide/baking soda gel placed over the wound and covered with a sealing dressing. The study team will determine which side gets assigned standard surgical dressing by the flip of a coin.
On Day 0 patients will undergo bilateral inguinal surgery. One side will be dressed using a standard surgical dressing, while the other will use a combination hydrogen peroxide/baking soda gel placed over the wound and covered with a sealing dressing. The study team will determine which side gets assigned standard surgical dressing by the flip of a coin.
Placebo Comparator: Dermabond-Placebo Comparator
On Day 0 patients will undergo bilateral inguinal surgery. One side will be dressed using a standard surgical dressing, while the other will use a combination hydrogen peroxide/baking soda gel placed over the wound and covered with a sealing dressing. The study team will determine which side gets assigned standard surgical dressing by the flip of a coin.
On Day 0 patients will undergo bilateral inguinal surgery. One side will be dressed using a standard surgical dressing, while the other will use a combination hydrogen peroxide/baking soda gel placed over the wound and covered with a sealing dressing. The study team will determine which side gets assigned standard surgical dressing by the flip of a coin.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Wound infection, wound dehiscence, allergic reaction to gel components, width, elevation, color, marks and general appearance measured at clinic visits.
Time Frame: days7 and day 14
days7 and day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Steve Hodges, MD, Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 5, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Wound Healing

Clinical Trials on Hydrogen Peroxide Oxygen producing gel

3
Subscribe