- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01011023
Unnecessary Gastric Decompression in Distal Elective Bowel Anastomoses in Children. A Randomized Study
November 10, 2009 updated by: Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez
Objective.
To study the role of nasogastric drainage to prevent postoperative complications in children with distal elective bowel anastomosis.
Summary Background Data.
Nasogastric drainage has been used as a routine measure after gastrointestinal surgery in children and adults, to hasten bowel function, prevent post operative complications and shorten hospital stay.
However, there is no former study that states in a scientific manner its benefit in children.
Methods.
The investigators performed a clinical controlled, randomized trial, comprising 60 children that underwent distal elective bowel anastomoses comparing post operative complications between a group with nasogastric tube in place (n=29) and one without it (n=31).
As an equivalence study the investigators expected that the two techniques were equivalent.
Statistics: Descriptive statistics for global description.
Student's t test for quantitative variables and chi square test for qualitative variables.
Considering statistically significant a p-value less than 0.05.
Being an equivalence study, the default delta generated by the Stata command "equim" was used to demonstrate the equivalence between both groups.
Results: Demographic data and diagnosis were comparable in both groups (p=NS).
No anastomotic leakage or entero-cutaneous fistulae was found in any patient.
The investigators demonstrated equivalency since each confidence interval is entirely contained within delta, except for one variable (beginning deambulation), in which equivalency is suggested.
There were no significant differences between groups in abdominal distention, infection, or hospital stay variables.
Only one patient in the experimental group required placement of the nasogastric tube due to persistent abdominal distension (3.2%).
Conclusions.
The routine use of nasogastric drainage can be eliminated after distal elective intestinal surgery in children.
It's use should be individualized.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
60
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
DF
-
Mexico, DF, Mexico, 06720
- Hospital Infantil de Mexico
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
1 month to 18 years (Child, Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients between the ages of 1 month to 18 years old that required elective laparotomy with an intestinal anastomosis (jejunum, ileum and colon).
Exclusion Criteria:
Non elective anastomosis and high risk groups:
- newborns
- upper gastrointestinal tract anastomoses (esophagus, gastric, duodenal or jejunal)
- bilious-digestive or rectal anastomoses
- immunosuppressed patients
- gastrostomy or any pre anastomotic derivation
- multiple anastomoses
- chronic intestinal obstruction
- intraoperative fluids-electrolyte disorders
- reductive enteroplasty (tapering)
- emergency operations and patients who did not complete the minimum POP follow up of one month.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: WITHOUT NASOGASTRIC TUBE
1. Experimental group (EG): without NGT, by removing the NGT at the end of the surgery, once the stomach had been aspirated,
|
Avoid the 5 post operative application of nasogastric tube in the experimental group vs the control group with the usual nasogastric tube
|
Active Comparator: WITH NASOGASTRIC TUBE
2. Control group (CG): with NGT, with radiographic corroboration of correct placement after the surgery.
Both groups were given: 5-day fasting because it was the therapeutic gold standard at our hospital and our country, intravenous solutions and antibiotics for 5 days, ranitidine, and analgesics, without use of any antiemetic drug.
Once the fasting period ended, in the CG the NGT was clamped and withdrawn, and in both groups oral fluids and diet were started.
Once the regular diet was tolerated, the patients were discharged and followed up at clinic 30 days afterwards.
|
Avoid the 5 post operative application of nasogastric tube in the experimental group vs the control group with the usual nasogastric tube
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
beginning peristalsis, beginning bowel movement, beginning ambulation, time to full diet intake, post-operative stay.
Time Frame: first 5 postoperative days
|
first 5 postoperative days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
mild and persistent vomiting, persistent abdominal distention, wound infection or dehiscence, gastrointestinal bleeding, and chief complaint as well as anastomotic leak or dehiscence, reoperation and death.
Time Frame: first 30 postoperative days
|
first 30 postoperative days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Study Chair: JOSE MANUEL TOVILLA-MERCADO, SURGEON, Hospital Infantil de Mexico
- Study Chair: PABLO LEZAMA-DEL-VALLE, SURGEON, Hospital Infantil de Mexico
- Study Chair: JAIME NIETO-ZERMEÑO, SURGEON, Hospital Infantil de Mexico
- Principal Investigator: ROBERTO DAVILA, SURGEON, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez
- Study Chair: EDUARDO BRACHO-BLANCHET, SURGEON, HOSPITAL INFATIL DE MEXICO FEDERICO GOMEZ
- Study Chair: RICARDO REYES-RETANA, SURGEON, Hospital Infantil de Mexico
- Study Chair: JOSE ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ-PLATA, SURGERY, Hospital Infantil de Mexico
- Study Chair: FERNANDO MONTES-TAPIA, SURGERY, Hospital Infantil de Mexico
- Study Chair: ALFONSO REYES-LOPEZ, STATISTIC, Hospital Infantil de Mexico
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg. 1995 May;221(5):469-76; discussion 476-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199505000-00004.
- Nelson R, Tse B, Edwards S. Systematic review of prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal operations. Br J Surg. 2005 Jun;92(6):673-80. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5090.
- Dinsmore JE, Maxson RT, Johnson DD, Jackson RJ, Wagner CW, Smith SD. Is nasogastric tube decompression necessary after major abdominal surgery in children? J Pediatr Surg. 1997 Jul;32(7):982-4; discussion 984-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(97)90382-1.
- Sandler AD, Evans D, Ein SH. To tube or not to tube: do infants and children need post-laparotomy gastric decompression? Pediatr Surg Int. 1998 Jul;13(5-6):411-3. doi: 10.1007/s003830050351.
- Argov S, Goldstein I, Barzilai A. Is routine use of the nasogastric tube justified in upper abdominal surgery? Am J Surg. 1980 Jun;139(6):849-50. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(80)90395-5.
- Wolff BG, Pembeton JH, van Heerden JA, Beart RW Jr, Nivatvongs S, Devine RM, Dozois RR, Ilstrup DM. Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1989 Jun;209(6):670-3; discussion 673-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198906000-00003.
- Savassi-Rocha PR, Conceicao SA, Ferreira JT, Diniz MT, Campos IC, Fernandes VA, Garavini D, Castro LP. Evaluation of the routine use of the nasogastric tube in digestive operation by a prospective controlled study. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992 Apr;174(4):317-20.
- Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Langevin JM, Kortbeek J. A prospective randomized trial of routine postoperative nasogastric decompression in patients with bowel anastomosis. Can J Surg. 1992 Dec;35(6):629-32.
- Ordorica-Flores RM, Bracho-Blanchet E, Nieto-Zermeno J, Reyes-Retana R, Tovilla-Mercado JM, Leon-Villanueva V, Varela-Fascinetto G. Intestinal anastomosis in children: a comparative study between two different techniques. J Pediatr Surg. 1998 Dec;33(12):1757-9. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90279-2.
- Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;2007(3):CD004929. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004929.pub3.
- Rogers JL, Howard KI, Vessey JT. Using significance tests to evaluate equivalence between two experimental groups. Psychol Bull. 1993 May;113(3):553-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.553.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
September 1, 2000
Primary Completion (Actual)
April 1, 2001
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2001
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 10, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 10, 2009
First Posted (Estimate)
November 11, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
November 11, 2009
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 10, 2009
Last Verified
November 1, 2009
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- robdape1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bowel Anastomosis
-
Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico GomezCompletedEarly Feeding | Bowel AnastomosisMexico
-
University Hospital of FerraraCompletedIntestinal Anastomosis Complication | Complication of Gastrointestinal AnastomosisItaly
-
Northern Jiangsu Province People's HospitalCompletedTime for R Anastomosis; Complication Related to AnastomosisChina
-
Cohera Medical, Inc.TerminatedColorectal and Ileorectal Anastomosis | Colocolic and Ileocolic Anastomosis | Coloanal and Ileoanal AnastomosisUnited States
-
Instituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialCompleted
-
Saint Petersburg State University, RussiaShandong Linglong Yingcheng HospitalRecruiting
-
Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico GomezUnknownColostomy | Surgical AnastomosisMexico
-
Seoul National University HospitalUnknownAnastomosisKorea, Republic of
-
National and Kapodistrian University of AthensNot yet recruitingColorectal Anastomosis
-
University of LeipzigUnknown
Clinical Trials on Non application of nasogastric tube in the experimental group
-
Zahide AkerenCompletedBreast Self-ExaminationTurkey
-
Centre Hospitalier Sud FrancilienCentre National de Ressources de lutte contre la DouleurCompleted
-
Tan Tock Seng HospitalNanyang Technological University; Woodlands Health CampusCompletedGastrointestinal Diseases | Esophagus Disorder | Enteral and Supplement Feeds Adverse ReactionSingapore
-
University of Turin, ItalyCompleted
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaCompletedExperimental MyastheniaChina
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandCompleted
-
Inonu UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of SevilleRecruiting
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterCompleted
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Completed