CMAC® Versus Airtraq® and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Difficult Tracheal Intubation.

June 17, 2012 updated by: John Laffey, University College Hospital Galway

Comparison of the CMAC® Device to the Airtraq® and the Macintosh Laryngoscope in Patients With Anatomical Characteristics Predictive of Difficult Tracheal Intubation.

It is essential that anaesthetists successfully perform orotracheal intubation in scenarios in which intubation is potentially more difficult, such as where anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation are present.

The CMAC® Laryngoscope is a new intubating device. It is designed to provide a view of the glottis without alignment of the oral, pharyngeal and tracheal axes.

The CMAC may be especially effective in situations where intubation of the trachea is potentially difficult.

The efficacy of this device in comparison to the traditional Macintosh laryngoscope and other novel laryngoscopes is not known.

We aim to compare its performance to that of the Macintosh laryngoscope, the gold standard device, in patients with one or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation.

The investigators further aim to compare it to the Airtraq® device a device which has been shown to be superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope in previous trials.

The investigators primary hypothesis is that, in the hands of experienced anaesthetists, time to intubation would be shorter using the CMAC than using the Macintosh laryngoscope in patients with two or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation.

The investigators further hypothesize that the Airtraq® will be superior the CMAC® with one or more anatomical characteristics predictive of difficult intubation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Galway, Ireland
        • Galway University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA 1-3 patients undergoing surgical procedures requiring orotracheal intubation.
  • Written informed Consent
  • No relevant drug allergies
  • Patients with 2 or more of the following predictors of difficult intubation:

    • Mallampatti II - IV
    • Thyromental distance < 6cm
    • Mouth opening < 3.5 cm
    • Cervical spine disease
    • Anteriorly protruding incisors
    • Presence of Caps or Crowns

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of or risk factors for gastric regurgitation
  • Patients unable to consent for the trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: macintosh
intubate with the macintosh laryngoscope
Active Comparator: C-MAC
intubate with the C-MAC laryngoscope
Active Comparator: Airtraq
intubate with the Airtraq device

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of successful placement of Tube in the Trachea
Time Frame: immediately
immediately

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
1. Duration of Intubation attempt (successful Attempts only) a. Absolute time taken to perform successful tracheal intubation b. Number of successful intubations completed within 30 seconds
Time Frame: immediately
immediately
2. Tracheal Intubation attempts. a. Overall number of attempts at Intubation. b. Number of successful intubations on first attempt
Time Frame: immediately
immediately
3. Laryngeal View Obtained c. Cormac and Lehane Grading of Best Laryngeal View d. Change in view compared to initial assessment by independent anaesthetist. e. POGO score.
Time Frame: immediately
immediately

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 14, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 15, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 19, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2012

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CMAC-1

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Difficult Intubation

Clinical Trials on macintosh laryngoscope

3
Subscribe