A Single Research Site Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale Pilot Validation Study

A Randomized Single Blind Placebo Controlled Single Research Site Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale Pilot Validation Study in Generally Healthy Subjects

The purpose of the research study is (1) to rate the taste, texture, appearance, and mixability of 2 different doses of orange flavored cholestyramine compared to orange flavored Tang, (2) rank the importance of the taste, texture, appearance, and mixability when rating cholestyramine and Tang to determine the accuracy and usefulness of a taste test questionnaire.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate patient acceptability of 2 doses of orange-flavored generic Questran (cholestyramine) versus orange-flavored Tang Drink Mix (a commercial powdered orange drink without cholestyramine) via 2 BASA scales. A second objective is to assess the 2 different versions of the BASA scale. One version will be unweighted with the score based upon the aggregate score of each acceptability component. A second version will be weighted based upon subjectively-reported importance of the acceptability components. The one main study objective or focus is to determine which version of a BASA scale best differentiates patient acceptability of a bile acid sequestrant (cholestyramine) versus a placebo control powder (containing no bile acid sequestrant) thereby determining which BASA scale is the best validated instrument for future studies in assessing and comparing patient acceptability of bile acid sequestrants.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40213
        • L-MARC Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Subjects or generally healthy volunteers are eligible for inclusion if they meet the following inclusion criteria during the Screening Period:

  • Men or women 18-70 years of age
  • In general good health.
  • Subjects are capable of giving informed consent, or if appropriate, have an acceptable surrogate capable of giving consent on the subject's behalf.
  • Subjects are willing and readily able to be contacted for post-study safety phone call assessments one to seven days after the single study visit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior intolerance to bile acid sequestrants
  • Women who are either pregnant, or who are not practicing any form of birth control.
  • Prior gastrointestinal surgery
  • History of ongoing gastrointestinal symptoms (indigestion, constipation, or diarrhea)
  • History of bowel obstruction, malabsorption, or irritable bowel syndrome
  • History of esophageal disease
  • Current or past history of gall bladder disease
  • Subjects enrolled in another experimental (interventional) protocol within the past 30 days prior to visit 1.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus
  • Known history of triglyceride levels > 300 mg/dl.
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse within 1 year of study entry
  • Alcohol intake that exceeds more than 2 units of alcohol drinks per day
  • Blood donation within 8 weeks of the study or anticipation of blood donation during the study.
  • Exposure to bile acid sequestrants (colesevelam HCl, cholestyramine, colestipol within 30 of visit 1).
  • Any other situation in which the Investigator makes the judgment that participation in the study would not be in the best interest of the study participant, or in the best interest of providing reliable study data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: CROSSOVER
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cholestyramine 4 grams
Cholestyramine 4 grams one time dose
Other Names:
  • Questran
Cholestyramine 12 grams one dose, one day
Other Names:
  • Questran
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Cholestyramine 12 grams
Cholestyramine 4 grams one time dose
Other Names:
  • Questran
Cholestyramine 12 grams one dose, one day
Other Names:
  • Questran
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Tang
Tang one dose one day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Acceptability of Orange-flavored Generic Questran (Cholestyramine) vs. Tang (a Commercial Powdered Orange Drink) Via 2 Versions of a Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability (BASA) Scale.
Time Frame: 1 Day
The Bile Acid Sequestrant Acceptability Scale has 4 scoring categories: taste, texture, appearance and mixability. Participants rank each category separately. The best possible score for each category is 5 and the worst possible score is 1.
1 Day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weighted vs. Unweighted BASA Scale
Time Frame: 1 Day
The total aggregate scores for the complete BASA scale were calculated for Cholestyramine 4g, Cholestyramine 12g, and Tang. The total best possible score was 20 and the total worst possible score was 4. A weighted aggregate BASA scale score was also calculated for the Cholestyramine 4g, Cholestyramine 12g, and Tang. The best possible weighted score was 60 and the worst possible weighted score was 4.
1 Day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 4, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 12, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 1, 2011

Last Verified

July 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Cholestyramine

3
Subscribe