Propofol Sedation During Upper Endoscopy With and Without Topical Pharyngeal Anesthesia

December 2, 2014 updated by: Lukas Degen, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Study of Propofol Sedation During Upper Endoscopy With and Without Topical Pharyngeal Anesthesia

It is unclear whether a topical pharyngeal anesthesia adds any benefit to the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under a propofol sedation. We hypothesize that a topical pharyngeal anesthesia does not ease the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy under propofol sedation. The aim of this study is therefore to quantify the impact of a topical pharyngeal anesthesia to the upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients sedated with propofol.

Patients will be randomized to receive a topical pharyngeal spray containing either an anesthetic drug (lidocaine 10%) or a placebo. Thereafter the upper endoscopy will be conducted in its standard manner.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

294

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • BS
      • Basel, BS, Switzerland, 4031
        • University Hospital; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
    • ZH
      • Zollikerberg, ZH, Switzerland, 8125
        • Hospital of Zollikerberg, Internal Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled diagnostic upper endoscopy
  • Wish to be sedated
  • ASA class I - III
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency medical examinations
  • Therapeutic Endoscopy
  • ASA class IV
  • Pregnancy
  • Known allergy to propofol or lidocaine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Anesthesia (=A) with lidocaine 10%
3 min before sedation 4 puffs of terbutaline diluted lidocaine solution (Xylocaine ® 10% spray, Astra Zeneca, London, UK) will be sprayed on the pharynx
3 min before the endoscopy under propofol sedation 4 puffs of lidocaine 10% will be sprayed on the pharynx as a pharyngeal anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Xylocaine 10% spray
Placebo Comparator: A with diluted gentian root solution
3 min before sedation 4 puffs of highly diluted gentian solution will be sprayed on the pharynx
As a basis, an infusion of water (45%), ethanol (35%) and gentian root cut will be used. The gentian root infusion is approved as a natural flavor in the food industry.3 min before the endoscopy under propofol sedation 4 puffs of this gentian root infusion will be sprayed on the pharynx as a pharyngeal anesthesia
Other Names:
  • Gentian root extract, CAS no. 72968-42-4

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number triggered gag reflex during the intubation of the endoscope
Time Frame: Start of the exam until the successful intubation of the esophagus with the endoscope
Start of the exam until the successful intubation of the esophagus with the endoscope
Number of attempts of intubation with the endoscope through the upper esophageal sphincter
Time Frame: Start of the exam until the successful intubation of the esophagus with the endoscope
Start of the exam until the successful intubation of the esophagus with the endoscope
Extent of salivation during intubation
Time Frame: Start of the exam until the successful intubation of the esophagus with the endoscope
Start of the exam until the successful intubation of the esophagus with the endoscope

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Amount of propofol used to successfully intubate the esophagus
Time Frame: Start of the exam until the successful intubation of the esophagus with the endoscope
Start of the exam until the successful intubation of the esophagus with the endoscope
Total amount of propofol used during the investigation
Time Frame: From the start until the end of the exam
From the start until the end of the exam
Overall assessment of the procedure by the endoscopist
Time Frame: Immediately after finishing the endoscopy
Immediately after finishing the endoscopy
Assumption of the endoscopist if lidocaine or placebo has been used
Time Frame: Immediately after finishing the endoscopy
Immediately after finishing the endoscopy
Overall assessment of the investigation by the patient
Time Frame: Immediately after recovery of consciousness of the patient
Immediately after recovery of consciousness of the patient
Extent of amnesia in the patient
Time Frame: Immediately after recovery of consciousness of the patient
Immediately after recovery of consciousness of the patient
Experienced problems (aspiration, bronchospasm, desaturation)
Time Frame: From the start until the end of the exam
From the start until the end of the exam
The impact of the individual endoscopists or registered nurses involved in the endoscopy
Time Frame: After finishing the entire study
After finishing the entire study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ludwig T Heuss, MD, Spital Zollikerberg
  • Principal Investigator: Lukas Degen, Prof, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 3, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conscious Sedation

Clinical Trials on Lidocaine 10%

3
Subscribe