Comparing Two Different Approaches in the Screening of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes (CFRD)

December 20, 2017 updated by: Imperial College London

A Comparative Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Two Approaches in the Screening for Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes in Adult With Cystic Fibrosis: i) a Selective Approach; ii) an Unselected Annual Oral Glucose Tolerance Test

The incidence of cystic fibrosis related diabetes (CFRD) has risen significantly as patients' survival improves. Early diagnosis of CFRD is crucial to prevent the unnecessary deterioration of lung function and nutritional status, both of which affect the patient's overall survival. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGGT) is the accepted method for detecting CFRD. The Cystic Fibrosis Trust guidelines (2004) recommend that patients with CF over the age of twelve years should be screened annually. Most hospitals use an annual OGTT. Performing OGTT on all CF patients is inconvenient and may not be cost effective, as patients have to starve overnight and need to spend an extra 2 hours in the hospital in addition to all the other annual review tests. In our centre, a selective approach is used. If patients have an abnormal random blood glucose and /or abnormal glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and/or symptoms of hyperglycaemia or unexplained weight loss then an OGTT will be performed.

The aims of this study are

  1. To compare the clinical efficiency in the screening for CFRD in the two different methods: i)a selective approach , ii)an unselected annual OGTT for all patients.
  2. To compare the cost effectiveness of the two approaches in the screening for CFRD.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

CFRD affects 30% of all patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) by the age of twenty-five. Early diagnosis of CFRD is crucial to prevent the unnecessary deterioration of pulmonary function and nutritional status, both of which affect the patient's overall survival. The selective approach takes less patient time and is less expensive. If it is equally accurate it should be used routinely. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is the accepted method for detecting CFRD and the Cystic Fibrosis Trust guidelines recommend that patients with CF over the age of twelve years should be screened annually. Yung et al, questioned this approach and argued that performing OGTT on all CF patients is inconvenient and may not be cost effective, as patients have to starve overnight and need to spend an extra 2 hours in the hospital in addition to all the other annual review tests.

In this study, a selective approach in performing OGTTs in the screening for CFRD will be used; this includes the use of a combination of clinical and biochemical criteria that of abnormal random blood glucose and /or abnormal glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and/or symptoms of hyperglycaemia, or weight loss.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW3 6NP
        • Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • first one hundred consecutive clinically stable patients with CF attending annual review from January 2009
  • 16 years of age and over will be eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with an existing diagnosis of CFRD.
  • patients with an infective exacerbation (i.e. on a new course of antibiotics)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: CF patients without known diagnose of CFRD
There is only one arm. All patients in the study had the same procedures (ie. an OGTT). Investigators used the screening criteria in parallel to this.
A study subject has an abnormal OGTT will be referred to a cystic fibrosis consultant who is not involved in the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To identify if using the selective approach to screen for CFRD is as accurate as screening all patients with OGTT at annual review.
Time Frame: 6 months
  1. Patients identified for OGTT based on the selective approach by the two independent reviewers will be compared.
  2. Patients will form two groups:

    i)those identified as needing OGTT, ii)those on whom they considered it unnecessary

  3. The results of the two groups will then be compared with the data obtain from OGTT to which the two reviewers were 'blinded'
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Which is the more cost effective way of screening all patients with OGTT?
Time Frame: 6 months
  1. Calculate the cost of glucose powder and laboratory analysis for each OGTT.
  2. Compare the cost effectiveness of carrying out OGTT on patients identified by the selective approach with the cost of carrying out OGTT on all patients.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maragret E Hodson, Professor, Imperial College London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 22, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Screening of Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes

Clinical Trials on Glucose profile for 2 weeks

3
Subscribe