Closed Reduction of Distal Forearm Fractures by Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians: A Prospective Study

April 8, 2010 updated by: InMotion Orthopaedic Research Center

Closed Reduction and Cast Immobilization of Distal Radius Fractures by Pediatric Emergency Medicine

Distal forearm fractures are amongst the most frequently encountered orthopedic injuries in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Immediate closed manipulation and cast immobilization, is still the mainstay of management. The initial management of non-displaced or minimally displaced extremity fractures and relocation of uncomplicated joint dislocations is part of the usual practice of emergency medicine. Although focused training in fracture-dislocation reduction techniques is a part of the core curriculum of emergency medicine training programs, there is limited data discussing outcomes following restorative fracture care by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM)physicians.

The primary objective of this study is to compare length-of-stay and clinical outcomes after closed manipulation of uncomplicated, isolated, distal forearm fractures, by PEMs to those after manipulation by pediatric orthopedic surgeons. Our hypothesis is that there is no difference in emergency department length-of-stay when fracture reduction is performed by a PEM versus a post graduate year 3 or 4 orthopedic resident. Secondary outcomes that will be assessed include: loss of reduction needing re-manipulation at follow up, cast related complications, radiographic and functional healing at 6-8 weeks post injury.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Pediatric forearm fractures are common injuries and a frequent cause for an emergency room admission. Ward et al have outlined the demands that emergency department coverage places on practicing orthopedic surgeons. Assuming no statistically significant differences in outcomes, there are potential advantages of having PEMs provide restorative fracture care at the initial visit. This practice would permit judicious orthopedic consultation at a time when several emergency department's are facing an "on call" specialist coverage crisis and there exists a nationwide shortage of fellowship trained pediatric orthopedic specialists, in addition to ACGME mandated duty hour restrictions for orthopedic residents.

Pershad et al conducted a retrospective study with historical controls, of 60 patients with distal radius fracture that were reduced by an orthopedic resident or PEM physician. In this review, there were no differences in rates of re-intervention to restore fracture alignment or ED length-of-stay between the two groups.Mean facility charges were lower in the group treated by PEMs.

It is our hypothesis that with goal directed training, PEM physicians can perform closed reduction of uncomplicated distal forearm fractures with outcomes that are similar to when fracture reduction is performed by senior orthopedic resident physicians.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38103
        • Lebonheur Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 18 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The inclusion criteria will include patients who present to LeBonheur Emergency room with an angulated or displaced distal radius fracture that meet standard orthopaedic criteria for manipulation. Distal forearm will be defined anatomically as the distal third of the radius or ulna.

Exclusion Criteria:

The exclusion criteria will be patients with an open fracture, neurovascular compromise at presentation or who have undergone prior manipulation of their fracture. Prior manipulation of a fracture is defined when a patient has their fracture manipulated at an outlying facility prior to arriving to LeBonhuer emergency room.

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Pediatric Emergency Physician
Patients randomized to Pediatric Emergency Physician Group will have their fracture reduced by a Pediatric Emergency Physician
Fracture reduction
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Orthopaedic physician
Patients to be randomized to Orthopaedic physician Group will have their fracture reduced by an Orthopaedic Physician
Fracture reduction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adequate Alignment of the forearm fracture
Time Frame: 5-7 days post-injury
The primary outcome in this study is the determination of whether there is adequate alignment of the fracture at 5-7 days post-injury. The proportion of patients with adequate alignments will be compared between the Pediatric Emergency Medicine and the Orthopaedic groups.
5-7 days post-injury

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: 6-8 weeks post-injury
Secondary outcomes to be assessed include incidence of failed apposition needing remanipulation at follow-up, cast-related complications, radiographic and functional healing at 6-8 weeks post-injury, length of stay in the emergency department, and facility charges. Comparisons between the two treatment groups (PEM and OP) will also be made with respect to each of these outcome variables.
6-8 weeks post-injury

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Jay Pershad, MD, University of Tennessee Health Sciences
  • Principal Investigator: Shehma Khan, MD, University of Tennessee Health Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

August 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 12, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 12, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2010

Last Verified

April 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Distal Forearm Fractures

Clinical Trials on Distal Forearm Fracture Reduction

3
Subscribe