Rubidium-82 - An Alternative Radiopharmaceutical for Myocardial Imaging(Rb-ARMI) (Rb-ARMI)

November 20, 2019 updated by: Rob Beanlands, Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in Canada. Fifty percent of all Tc-99m used in nuclear medicine is for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) with SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). The reduced supply of Tc-99m requires other tracers to be investigated. Tl-201 SPECT is available but generally accepted to be inferior to Tc-99m. Rubidium (Rb-82), a nonreactor produced tracer, is believed to have superior accuracy compared to Tc-99m and Tl-201 SPECT, with 5-20 times lower radiation dose. In the U.S. Rb-82 generators have been FDA-approved since 1989 and are used increasingly for CAD diagnosis, but are still considered investigational in Canada.

Objectives: To demonstrate that Rb-82 PET MPI is i) an accurate, cost-effective alternative to Tc-99m; ii) superior to Tl-201; iii) can be implemented in multiple Canadian centres for the diagnosis and management of CAD. Short term clinical outcomes of Rb-82 will be evaluated and compared to Tc-99m and Tl-201 SPECT MPI across Canadian imaging centres.

Plan: Rb-ARMI is an innovative multidisciplinary, multi-centre imaging research initiative that builds on existing collaborative networks and Canadian industry partnership (DRAXIMAGE). Rb PET will be implemented, standardized and validated in 4 overlapping phases over 2 years, at 10 Canadian Centres.

Impact: This project meets the expected goal to "lead to clinical trial applications and clinical validation studies which compare novel radiolabeled probes with those in current practice", and to "bring a new radiopharmaceutical to the clinic" within a short time frame. Increased use of Rb-82 PET MPI has the potential to reduce the demand for Tc-99m by 10-40%, effectively increasing the available supply for other procedures, and improving the standard of care for many Canadians at risk of heart disease.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of death in Canada. Half of all the Tc-99m used in nuclear medicine is for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease (CAD) with SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). The reduced supply of Tc-99m requires other tracers to be investigated. While Tl-201 SPECT is available, it is generally accepted to be inferior to the Tc-99m tracers; low specificity may prompt further testing and increase costs. Rubidium (Rb-82) PET MPI is believed to have superior accuracy compared to Tc-99m and Tl-201, and 5-20 times lower radiation dose. Rb-82 is produced in a generator from the cyclotron-produced (non-reactor) parent isotope Sr-82. In the U.S. Rb-82 generators have been FDA-approved since 1989. Rb-82 PET MPI has been reimbursed in the U.S. since 1995 and is used increasingly for CAD diagnosis, but is still considered investigational in Canada.

Objectives: Primary: To demonstrate that Rb-82 PET MPI is i) an accurate alternative to Tc-99m SPECT;ii) is superior to Tl-201; iii) can be implemented in multiple Canadian centres for diagnosis and management of CAD. Secondary: To evaluate short-term clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of Rb-82 PET MPI for diagnosis and management of CAD compared i) to Tc-99m and Tl-201 MPI and ii) across imaging centres.

Hypotheses: 1: Rubidium MPI can be standardized with highly repeatable interpretation across multiple Canadian centres, using current 3D PET and 3D PET/CT imaging technology.

2-A: Rubidium PET MPI has superior accuracy compared to Tl-201 SPECT MPI, using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the gold-standard for diagnosis of CAD. (reference centre A - Ottawa) 2-B: Rubidium PET MPI has comparable accuracy to Tc-99m SPECT MPI. (reference centre B - Quebec) 3: Rubidium PET MPI has similar (non-inferior) accuracy across additional Canadian imaging centres compared to the primary imaging centres 4-A: Rubidium PET MPI is cost-effective compared to Tc-99m and Tl-201 SPECT MPI in the diagnosis and management of CAD, in terms of tracer costs and down-stream resource utilization such as ICA.

4-B: Rubidium PET MPI improves short-term clinical outcomes measured at 6 months, compared to Tc-99m or Tl-201 SPECT MPI in the management of CAD, in terms of adverse cardiac events including cardiac death, nonfatal MI, late revascularization and cardiac hospitalization. 4-C: Site-specific attributes will impact resource utilization and local Rb-82 PET costs.

Research Plan: Rb-ARMI is an innovative multidisciplinary, multi-centre imaging research initiative that builds on existing collaborative networks (ICT, IMAGE-HF, CAIN, CADRE) and Canadian industry partnership (DRAXIMAGE). Rb-82 PET will be implemented, standardized and validated in 4 overlapping phases over 2 years, in up to 10 centres across Canada, including Ottawa, Quebec City, Montreal, Sherbrooke, Toronto, Hamilton, London, Thunder Bay, Halifax, and Edmonton.

Phase 1 is a knowledge translation and standardization phase (0-6 months). Qualifying scans using cardiac phantoms will be performed to standardize imaging protocols across centres. Site training and co-reading of an initial series of scans from each centre will be performed by the reference site (Ottawa), to confirm low inter-operator variability (≤5%) in interpretation (sum stress score and sum difference score).

Phase 2 is a matched-cohort comparative accuracy study (months 3-20). In the reference centres, pre-test likelihood ± extent of CAD will be assessed in patients referred for assessment of ischemia (N=200) undergoing dipyridamole Rb-82 PET MPI and coronary angiography (ICA) within 6 months. These patients will be used to identify a matched group undergoing Tl-201 SPECT to compare accuracy in 2A. A similar study will be performed to compare Rb-82 PET with Tc-99m SPECT MPI in centre B (the site most ready to start Rb-82 PET MPI) using the same propensity-matched cohort design in 2B. All 800 angiography studies (+600 in phase 3) will be co-read by the core lab in Montreal.

Phase 3 tests whether the implementation of Rb-82 PET across the additional imaging centres in Canada can achieve comparable accuracy, again using ICA as the gold-standard in N=600 patients (months 4-20).

Phase 4 is a cost-effectiveness study to evaluate short-term resource utilization (RU), cost and outcomes at 6-month follow-up for: Rb-82 PET vs SPECT MPI (centres A and B) in 4A and 4B (N=1000); Rb-82 PET in additional Canadian sites vs the primary centres in 4C (N=1000). RU will be measured during follow up and unit costs estimated. Analysis will estimate incremental costs associated with each of the outcomes within the composite endpoint, as well as costs associated specifically with the imaging and subsequent diagnostic tests. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be undertaken in accordance with Canadian guidelines for economic evaluations. Database review, follow-up completion, data analysis and manuscript preparation will be completed in the final 6 months of the study.

Impact: The project meets the expected goal of the RFA to "lead to clinical trial applications and clinical validation studies which compare novel radiolabeled probes with those in current practice", and to "bring a new radiopharmaceutical to the clinic" within a short time frame. Increased use of Rb-82 PET MPI has the potential to reduce the demand for Tc-99m by 10-40%, effectively increasing the available supply for other procedures, and improving the standard of care for many Canadians at risk of heart disease.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4W7
        • University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients referred for a clinically indicated PET Rb-82 myocardial perfusion scan.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients referred for myocardial perfusion imaging for diagnosis and/or risk stratification for CAD
  • male or female
  • 18 years of age or older
  • having given informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • contraindications to dipyridamole radionuclide imaging including
  • severe reactive airway disease
  • <3 days post MI/acute coronary syndrome (ACS) presentation
  • unstable crescendo angina
  • high grade atrio-ventricular (AV) block
  • allergy to dipyridamole or theophyllines
  • caffeine within 24 hours
  • theophyllines within 48 hours
  • severe claustrophobia
  • patients who may be pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
PET Rb-82 perfusion imaging
Patients diagnosed with or suspected coronary artery disease requiring evaluation and/or risk stratification will undergo PET Rb-82 perfusion imaging.
Patients will undergo a clinically indicated PET Rb-82 myocardial perfusion scan for diagnosis or risk stratification of CAD. This cohort will be matched to the SPECT perfusion database.
SPECT perfusion imaging
Patients diagnosed with or suspected coronary artery disease who have undergone SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
Patients will undergo a clinically indicated PET Rb-82 myocardial perfusion scan for diagnosis or risk stratification of CAD. This cohort will be matched to the SPECT perfusion database.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The accuracy of rubidium-82 PET MPI for the diagnosis of CAD will be compared to Tc-99m and Tl-201 SPECT.
Time Frame: Baseline
Accuracy of an abnormal PET and SPECT MPI, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and likelihood ratios will be determined in the angiography cohorts using ICA as the gold standard. The primary analysis will be for an abnormal MPI defined as Sum Stress Score ≥4 or Sum Difference Score ≥2.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluate the short-term resource utilization, costs and cost-effectiveness of rubidium-82 PET MPI for diagnosis and management of patients evaluated for CAD, compared to Tc-99m and Tl-201 SPECT
Time Frame: 6 months
Telephone follow-up will occur at 6 months to assess economic and clinical outcomes. Economic measures of post-MPI resource utilization include the occurrence and frequency of diagnostic, and therapeutic procedures, cardiac hospitalization, and out-patient consultations. Clinical outcomes will be the time to occurrence of the first composite clinical endpoint (described below); and occurrence of the composite endpoint; individual components of the composite endpoint and functional capacity.
6 months
To evaluate the short-term clinical outcomes of rubidium-82 PET MPI for diagnosis and management of CAD, compared to Tc-99m and Tl-201 SPECT
Time Frame: 6 months
Clinical Outcomes (4B): A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model will be used to assess the annual occurrence of the composite endpoint between the imaging approaches and between reference and additional sites, in the presence of the other covariates listed above. The proportional hazards assumption underlying the model will be assessed, and if the assumption does not hold an appropriate time dependent covariate will be included in the model. Evaluation of clinical outcomes as a primary endpoint would require longer follow-up than this RFA enables.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 21, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

November 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2019

Last Verified

November 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Myocardial perfusion imaging using Rb-82 PET or Tc-99m or Tl SPECT

3
Subscribe