Safety and Efficacy of Ranibizumab in Diabetic Macular Edema (RELATION)

August 20, 2012 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 12-month, Two-armed, Randomized, Double-masked, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of Laser Photocoagulation as Adjunctive to Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections vs. Laser Photocoagulation Monotherapy in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema Followed by a 12 Month Follow up Period

This study was designed to confirm the efficacy and safety of laser photocoagulation as adjunctive therapy to ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus laser monotherapy in patients with visual impairment due to Diabetic Macular Edema. A subgroup of patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy were included to evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser photocoagulation as adjunctive therapy to ranibizumab 0.5 mg versus laser monotherapy in this population.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aschaffenburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bonn, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bremen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chemnitz, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Darmstadt, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dessau, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dortmund, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Dresden, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Eichstaett, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Essen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Freiburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Giessen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Karlsruhe, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kiel, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Koeln, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Landshut, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Marburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muenchen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Muenster, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mühlheim, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • München, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Münster, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nuernberg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Postdam, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Recklinghausen, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Regensburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rosenheim, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Siegburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Stuttgart, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ulm, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Visual acuity impairment caused by macular edema in at least one eye
  • Type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Stable medication of diabetes in past 3 month

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with uncontrolled systemic or ocular diseases
  • Laser photocoagulation in the study eye for the last 3 months
  • Any history of any intraocular surgery in the study eye within the past 3 months
  • Blood pressure > 160/100 mmHg

Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active laser photocoagulation and ranibizumab

Active laser treatment applied at baseline and reapplied if needed at intervals no shorter than 3 months from the last treatment.

Ranibizumab intravitreal injection given at baseline, at 30, 60 and 90 days and if needed, reapplied at intervals no shorter than 28 days from last treatment.

Active laser photocoagulation procedure at baseline and reapplied if needed at intervals no shorter than 3 months from the last treatment.
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg/0.05 ml intravitreal injection at baseline, 30, 60 and 90 days and if needed, reapplied at intervals no shorter than 28 days from last treatment.
Active Comparator: Active laser photocoagulation and sham injection

Active laser treatment applied at baseline and reapplied if needed at intervals no shorter than 3 months from the last treatment.

Sham intravitreal injection given at baseline, at 30, 60 and 90 days and if needed, reapplied at intervals no shorter than 28 days from last treatment.

Active laser photocoagulation procedure at baseline and reapplied if needed at intervals no shorter than 3 months from the last treatment.
Sham intravitreal injections at baseline, 30, 60 and 90 days and if needed, reapplied at intervals no shorter than 28 days from last treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) From Baseline to Month 12
Time Frame: 12 months
Mean change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters at 12 months compared to baseline was measured using Visual acuity (VA). VA accounts for the number of letters a participant can see using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)-like visual acuity testing charts, from a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. BCVA means that the participant's refraction is already taken into account when VA is determined. A higher BCVA number at 12 months in reference to baseline indicates improved BCVA.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 25, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 27, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2012

Last Verified

August 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Visual Impairment Due to Diabetic Macular Edema

Clinical Trials on Active laser photocoagulation

3
Subscribe