Dose Ranging Study of Pazopanib to Treat Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

December 7, 2017 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline

MD7110852, A Phase 2b Dose-Ranging Study of Pazopanib Eye Drops Versus Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections for the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and efficacy of different dosage regimens of pazopanib eye drops for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

MD7110852 is a Phase 2b dose-ranging study designed to demonstrate the 1 year efficacy and safety of pazopanib eye drops for the treatment of neovascular age related macular degeneration (AMD) in subjects whose disease is currently managed with anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) injection therapy. Eye drop regimens are double-masked with placebo eye drops and will have access to open-label ranibizumab intravitreal (IVT) injection if needed. The ranibizumab IVT injection every 4 weeks control arm is open-label.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

510

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2150
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2000
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Western Australia
      • Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia, 6009
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Bruxelles, Belgium, 1020
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Liège, Belgium, 4000
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 3N9
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8V 4X3
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 2Y9
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 4V2
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Mississauga, Ontario, Canada, L4W 1W9
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Aarhus, Denmark, DK-8000
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Glostrup, Denmark
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Baden-Wuerttemberg
      • Freiburg, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, 79106
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tuebingen, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany, 72076
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Bayern
      • Muenchen, Bayern, Germany, 80336
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Bonn, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 53127
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Sachsen
      • Dresden, Sachsen, Germany, 01307
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany, 04103
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Schleswig-Holstein
      • Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, 24105
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Friuli-Venezia-Giulia
      • Udine, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia, Italy, 33100
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Lombardia
      • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20132
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20157
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Piemonte
      • Torino, Piemonte, Italy, 10122
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Veneto
      • Padova, Veneto, Italy, 35128
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Aichi, Japan, 466-8560
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Aichi, Japan, 460-0011
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Aichi, Japan, 462-0825
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Chiba, Japan, 279-0021
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 812-8582
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fukushima, Japan, 960-1295
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 060-8604
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan, 001-0016
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Kagawa, Japan, 761-0793
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan, 101-8309
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Linköping, Sweden, SE-581 85
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Stockholm, Sweden, SE-112 82
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Uppsala, Sweden, SE-751 85
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Örebro, Sweden, SE-701 85
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Arizona
      • Peoria, Arizona, United States, 85381
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85020
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85014
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85704
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85710
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • California
      • Irvine, California, United States, 92697
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92354
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Poway, California, United States, 92064
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Santa Ana, California, United States, 92705
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Colorado
      • Golden, Colorado, United States, 80401
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33901
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Winter Haven, Florida, United States, 33880
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Kansas
      • Leawood, Kansas, United States, 66211
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Kentucky
      • Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42001
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Michigan
      • Royal Oak, Michigan, United States, 48073
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Traverse City, Michigan, United States, 49686
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • North Carolina
      • Asheville, North Carolina, United States, 28803
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28210
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Ohio
      • Beachwood, Ohio, United States, 44122
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44130
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43212
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Oregon
      • Ashland, Oregon, United States, 97520
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76104
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84107
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • GSK Investigational Site
      • Silverdale, Washington, United States, 98383
        • GSK Investigational Site
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • GSK Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged ≥50 years.
  • Active subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) lesion secondary to AMD in study eye: Total lesion area ≤12 disc areas with CNV ≥50% total lesion area.
  • Anti-Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) intravitreal injection experienced and in need of re-treatment.
  • Best-corrected visual acuity of at least 24 letters (equates to approximately 20/320 Snellen equivalents or better).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior ocular investigational drug/device for choroidal neovascularization, photodynamic therapy, radiation, subfoveal or juxtafoveal focal laser photocoagulation.
  • Prior failure to anti-VEGF intravitreal injection therapy.
  • Recent ocular investigational drug/device for non-CNV condition.
  • Prior ocular surgeries (vitrectomy, scleral buckle, or glaucoma filtering/shunt surgery). Cataract surgery permitted if ≥3 months and has posterior chamber intraocular lens.
  • Center-fovea involvement of any of the following: fibrosis, atrophy, serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment, or retinal pigment epithelial tear.
  • CNV in either eye due to other causes.
  • Clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathy or diabetic macular edema.
  • Recent myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension in spite of antihypertensive medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: investigational arm 1
5 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops TID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors.
Experimental: investigational arm 2
5 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors.
Experimental: investigational arm 3
10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops BID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors.
Experimental: investigational arm 4
10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops TID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors.
Experimental: investigational arm 5
10 mg/mL pazopanib eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor of multiple receptors including vascular endothelial growth factor receptors and platelet-derived growth factor receptors.
Placebo Comparator: placebo control arm
Placebo eye drops QID with allowance for as-needed ranibizumab injection
placebo eye drops
Active Comparator: active open-label control arm
Ranibizumab intravitreal injection every 4 weeks
Humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody fragment targeted against human vascular endothelial growth factor A

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Best-corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) as Measured by the Number of Letters Read on the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Grading Charts at a Starting Distance of 4 Meters at Week 52
Time Frame: Day 1 and 52 weeks
BCVA was measured in the study eye using the ETDRS grading charts starting at a test distance of 4 meters. The ETDRS grading chart was of at least 24 to 78 letters. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). An increase in the number of letters read correctly means that vision has improved. There were seven cut off points in change from baseline visual acuity on ETDRS grading chart which are, 15 to 29, 10 to 14, 5 to 9, -4 to 4, -5 to -9, -10 to -14 and -15 to -29 letters. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study.
Day 1 and 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Ranibizumab Re-injections Received Over 28 and 52 Weeks
Time Frame: Up to 52 weeks
The investigator interpreted each Week 4 to Week 52 Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan, BCVA score, and available Fluorescein angiography (FA)/Fundus photography (FP) and re-injected if one or more criteria were met. The criteria were: Evidence of Intraretinal (IR) (with or without cysts) fluid or Subretinal (SR) fluid, a serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment, a notable decline in Visual Acuity, new SR or IR macular hemorrhage that the investigator judges is associated with Choroidal neovascularization, increased lesion size on FA relative to the last angiogram as judged by the investigator or leakage on FA that the investigator judges would benefit from re-injection. Injection rate over 52 weeks was computed by taking the number of injections received divided by the number of visits for the participant. Likewise for 28 weeks it was estimated as the number of post baseline injections received divided by the number of post baseline visits at or before the week 28 visit.
Up to 52 weeks
Number of Participants With BCVA Over Time
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
BCVA was measured in the study eye using the ETDRS grading charts starting at a test distance of 4 meters. The ETDRS grading chart was of at least 24 to 78 letters. There were seven cut off points in change from baseline visual acuity on ETDRS grading chart which are, 15 to 29, 10 to 14, 5 to 9, -4 to 4, -5 to -9, -10 to -14 and -15 to -29 letters.
Up to Week 52
Number of Participants Analyzed for Visual Acuity (VA) Response Over Time
Time Frame: Week 52
VA was measured in the study eye using the ETDRS grading charts starting at a test distance of 4 meters.The ETDRS grading chart was of at least 24 to 78 letters. There were seven cut off points in change from baseline visual acuity on ETDRS grading chart which are, 15 to 29, 10 to 14, 5 to 9, -4 to 4, -5 to -9, -10 to -14 and -15 to -29 letters. This outcome measure contains the number of participants who were analyzed for VA response.
Week 52
Change From Baseline in Center Point Thickness (CPT) Over Time
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52
CPT was the inner limiting membrane to the beginning of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) inclusive of SR fluid. The outer boundary included the outer segment of the photoreceptors and not included the RPE. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study. In amendment 3, inclusion criterion number 5 was revised to remove the required quantitative OCT component. OCT examination was used to supplement FA findings and provided qualitative (presence of SR and/or IR fluid) and quantitative (a CPT that is at least 250 microns) evidence of an active subfoveal lesion. Hence data for pre and post amendment have been provided separately.
Baseline and Week 52
Number of Participants That Met Criteria for Re-injection
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
The investigator interpreted each Week 4 to Week 52 Optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan, BCVA score, and available Fluorescein angiography (FA)/Fundus photography (FP) and re-injected if one or more criteria were met. The criteria were: Evidence of Intraretinal (IR) (with or without cysts) fluid or Subretinal (SR) fluid, a serous retinal pigment epithelial detachment, a notable decline in Visual Acuity, new SR or IR macular hemorrhage that the investigator judges is associated with Choroidal neovascularization, increased lesion size on FA relative to the last angiogram as judged by the investigator or leakage on FA that the investigator judges would benefit from re-injection.
Up to Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of Choroidal Neovascularisation (CNV)
Time Frame: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Choroidal neovascularisation is progressive worsening of vision that can cause hemorrhage and exudation, and finally disciform scarring and retinal atrophy. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study.
Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of the CNV Lesion Complex (i.e. CNV, Blood, PED, and Fibrosis)
Time Frame: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
CNV is progressive worsening of vision that can cause hemorrhage and exudation, and finally disciform scarring and retinal atrophy. The change from baseline was calculated by subtracting the baseline values from the individual post-randomization values. If either the baseline or post-randomization value was missing, the change from baseline was set to missing as well. Day 1 values are considered as Baseline in this study.
Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change From Baseline in the Area of Fluorescein Leakage
Time Frame: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Fluorescein angiograms was performed at the Screening, Week 12, Week 28, and Week 52 Visits. All images, including any that were performed at the investigator's medical discretion, were transferred to the FPRC. Fluorescein was injected intravenously according to usual clinic procedures. Dose response was also examined under different aspects of re-injection, such as time to first injection, the percentage of participants that required an injection by Week 28, as well as the estimation of the probability of reinjection. FA assessments of area of fluorescein leakage, CNV area and area of CNV lesion complex were also examined for dose differentiation.
Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Change in Area of Serous Sensory Retinal Detachment (SSRD)
Time Frame: Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
This is an Optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameter used to manually measure thickness along any scan. OCT was performed at week 28 and week 52.
Day 1, Week 28 and Week 52
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Up to 52 Weeks
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Up to 52 Weeks
Summary of Potentially Clinically Important Findings for Ophthalmic Examinations
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
Opthalmicexaminations were done on Ocular alignment and motility, pupillary function, and visual fields by confrontation. Slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination of the anterior segment structure was performed. Fundus slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination, including use of accessory diagnostic lenses, to view the vitreous, retina (including posterior pole and periphery), macula, vasculature, and optic nerve was also performed. These examinations were performed on the study eye (SE) and the Fellow eye (FE). Participants with abnormal findings are listed here.
Up to Week 52
Summary of Intraocular Pressure Exam Findings
Time Frame: Up to week 52
Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement was done with Goldmann tonometer. Intraocular pressure was measured prior to dilating the pupil and, to account for diurnal variation, at approximately the same time of day for every visit.
Up to week 52
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Outside of Clinical Concern Range
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
Vital signs including systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate were measured throughout the study. Number of participants with vital signs outside of clinical concern Range were summarized. 'High' denotes above normal range and 'Low' denotes below normal range for all the categories. The potential clinical importance ranges (low and high) of the vital sign parameters were for systolic blood pressure (<85 and >160 millimeter of mercury [mmHg]), diastolic blood pressure (<45 and >100 mmHg) and heart rate (<40 and >110 beats per minute). Only those parameters for which at least one value of potential clinical importance was reported are summarized. The number of participants with potential clinical important vital parameter findings at any visit were reported.
Up to Week 52
Summary of Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings
Time Frame: Week 4, Week 28, Week 44 and Week 52
12-Lead ECGs were performed in triplicate and were obtained on Weeks 4 to Week 28 and Week 52. The on-treatment ECGs were used to ascertain any risk of QTc interval prolongation at extremely low pazopanib exposures compared to what was routinely observed in participants with cancer. The on-treatment ECG data collected from participants assigned to one of the control arms also provided ECG background rate data for participants not exposed to pazopanib. Participants with Clinically significant abnormal ECGs are included here.
Week 4, Week 28, Week 44 and Week 52
Summary of Hematology and Clinical Chemistry Parameters Data of Clinical Concern
Time Frame: Up to Week 52
The Laboratory Parameters included Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT), Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST), Calcium, Bicarbonate, Creatinine, Glucose, Hemoglobin, Lymphocytes, Platelet count, Potassium, Sodium, Thyroid Stimulating Hormone (TSH), Total Bilirubin, Total Neutrophils, Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and White Blood Cell count (WBC). Number of participants with Laboratory outside of clinical concern Range were summarized here. Data of high and low from the clinical concern range has been provided here. Here 'High' denotes above normal range and 'Low' denotes below normal range for all the categories.
Up to Week 52
Number of Participants With Laboratory Data of Clinical Concern for Urine Protein
Time Frame: Day 1 to Week 28 and Week 52
Urine Samples were collected from Day 1 to Week 28 and Week 52 for analyses. In this dipstick test, the level of protein in urine samples was recorded as negative (Neg), trace (tr), 1+, 2+, and 3+ (the plus sign increases with a higher level of proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive). Neg indicated no proteinuria and 3+(high positive) indicated worst proteinuria.
Day 1 to Week 28 and Week 52
Plasma Concentrations of Pazopanib
Time Frame: Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52
All participants in the eye drop containing arms had a single blood sample drawn for assessment of pazopanib plasma concentration at the Week 4, Week 24 and Week 24. The sample was drawn without restriction for the time interval between blood draw and the last dose of IP eye drops.
Week 4, Week 24 and Week 52

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

May 31, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2017

Last Verified

December 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Macular Degeneration

Clinical Trials on placebo

3
Subscribe