Neural and Behavioral Outcomes of Social Skills Groups in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

October 1, 2012 updated by: Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Acute and Sustained Effects of Social Skills Intervention on Neural and Behavioral Outcomes in Children With ASD

The purpose of this study is to compare two different treatment approaches to social skills groups for high-functioning children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). This project will examine changes in both behavior and the brain following treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite the fact that social skills impairments are the most persistent and pervasive symptoms affecting individuals with ASD, treatments targeting social skills have been the subject of few controlled investigations. The available literature suggests that cognitive behavioral techniques are commonly used and may improve targeted social skills in individuals with ASD. However, drawing firm conclusions about the efficacy of social skills treatment remains difficult, particularly with respect to maintenance of skills and generalization to natural settings, owing to methodological limitations of extant studies (e.g., small sample size, lack of manual-based curricula, minimal assessment of generalization or maintenance).

Several neuroimaging studies have found that individuals with ASD underactivate key brain regions involved in social cognition. However, there is also evidence to suggest that factors that increase attention to or interest in social stimuli are associated with more normal brain activity.

The purpose of this investigation is to examine the acute and sustained effects of social skills treatment on social cognition and the neural architecture that supports it. High-functioning children with ASD will be randomly assigned to a 12-week cognitive behavioral social skills group or a social play-based therapy group. For both types of groups, a parent session will be held concurrently. Functional MRI scans as well as behavioral assessments of social cognition, adaptive functioning, and symptom severity will be acquired at baseline, immediately following treatment, and at a 3-month follow-up.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Mount Sinai School of Medicine - Seaver Autism Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 8 to 11 years of age
  • Meets criteria for ASD according to psychiatric interview (DSM-IV), the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic, and the Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised
  • Verbal IQ ≥ 70, as measured by the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition or Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of psychiatric or neurological disorders other than ASD (e.g., schizophrenia, depression, seizure disorder)
  • Within 30 days prior to the initial evaluation, beginning any new psychotropic medication or other therapeutic intervention (e.g., behavior, speech, physical/occupational, cognitive, nutritional therapy) that would confound the evaluation of the social skills groups
  • Gross structural abnormality present in the brain (e.g., aneurysm)
  • History of head trauma or loss of consciousness
  • For any reason the child or parents appear unable to participate in study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group
The CBT social skills curriculum is manualized and anchored in CBT strategies, such as problem identification, affective education, performance feedback, and weekly homework activities to facilitate generalization. The curriculum is a compilation of lessons targeting key social deficits in children with ASD, such as nonverbal communication, emotion recognition, and theory of mind. Structured teaching includes defining skills, breaking them down into simple, concrete steps, modeling the skill through role-play, and introducing a game or activity to practice the target skill. The approach to the parent group will be psychoeducational with a focus on reviewing target skills, rationale for teaching target skills, homework, progress or obstacles, and identifying strategies to promote generalization. Parent information handouts will be provided.
Active Comparator: Social Play Group
The social play group is manualized, led by a trained clinician and support staff, follows a specific routine, and contains a parent group component. Group leaders will follow participants' interests and suggestions for games. Group leaders utilize strategies such as reflective functioning statements on the child's behaviors to build emotion-focused play skills. The therapeutic setting incorporates play designed to encourage emotion-focused play including make-believe (dolls, houses), sensory (e.g. play-doh), and cooperative play (e.g. board games) toys. The approach to the parent group will be supportive rather than psychoeducational. Parents will set the agenda for discussion, facilitated by the group leader.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2* (DANVA2)
Time Frame: Week 0
Assesses emotion recognition from facial expression, tone of voice, and posture. This instrument allows for the assessment of basic emotions conveyed by both adult and child models at high and low intensity. Nowicki and Carton [50] have shown that the DANVA2 has acceptable internal consistency for school age children and good test-retest reliability.
Week 0
Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2* (DANVA2)
Time Frame: Week 12
Assesses emotion recognition from facial expression, tone of voice, and posture. This instrument allows for the assessment of basic emotions conveyed by both adult and child models at high and low intensity. Nowicki and Carton [50] have shown that the DANVA2 has acceptable internal consistency for school age children and good test-retest reliability.
Week 12
Diagnostic Analysis of Nonverbal Accuracy-2* (DANVA2)
Time Frame: Week 24
Assesses emotion recognition from facial expression, tone of voice, and posture. This instrument allows for the assessment of basic emotions conveyed by both adult and child models at high and low intensity. Nowicki and Carton [50] have shown that the DANVA2 has acceptable internal consistency for school age children and good test-retest reliability.
Week 24
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task - Child Version
Time Frame: Week 0
The computerized children's version of the Eyes test is a reduced battery of 28-items measuring an individual's ability to interpret intentions and 'mentalizing' abilities, a hallmark social cognitive deficit in ASD. The adult RMET has shown sensitivity to change in clinical trials and the child version showed promising results in our preliminary analyses (see Preliminary Studies).
Week 0
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task - Child Version
Time Frame: Week 12
The computerized children's version of the Eyes test is a reduced battery of 28-items measuring an individual's ability to interpret intentions and 'mentalizing' abilities, a hallmark social cognitive deficit in ASD. The adult RMET has shown sensitivity to change in clinical trials and the child version showed promising results in our preliminary analyses (see Preliminary Studies).
Week 12
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task - Child Version
Time Frame: Week 24
The computerized children's version of the Eyes test is a reduced battery of 28-items measuring an individual's ability to interpret intentions and 'mentalizing' abilities, a hallmark social cognitive deficit in ASD. The adult RMET has shown sensitivity to change in clinical trials and the child version showed promising results in our preliminary analyses (see Preliminary Studies).
Week 24
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Time Frame: Week 0
We previously developed two activation tasks that tap different aspects of social cognition: 1) Interpreting Communicative Intent: Participants will view cartoon drawings of children while listening to short vignettes ending with a potentially ironic remark. Participants decide whether the speaker really meant what s/he said. 2) Affect and eye contact: Participants will view full-face pictures of people displaying happy, angry, fearful, or neutral affect. For each emotion, half of the faces show a direct gaze and half show a gaze aversion.
Week 0
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Time Frame: Week 12
We previously developed two activation tasks that tap different aspects of social cognition: 1) Interpreting Communicative Intent: Participants will view cartoon drawings of children while listening to short vignettes ending with a potentially ironic remark. Participants decide whether the speaker really meant what s/he said. 2) Affect and eye contact: Participants will view full-face pictures of people displaying happy, angry, fearful, or neutral affect. For each emotion, half of the faces show a direct gaze and half show a gaze aversion.
Week 12
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Time Frame: Week 24
We previously developed two activation tasks that tap different aspects of social cognition: 1) Interpreting Communicative Intent: Participants will view cartoon drawings of children while listening to short vignettes ending with a potentially ironic remark. Participants decide whether the speaker really meant what s/he said. 2) Affect and eye contact: Participants will view full-face pictures of people displaying happy, angry, fearful, or neutral affect. For each emotion, half of the faces show a direct gaze and half show a gaze aversion.
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)
Time Frame: Week 0
The SRS measures the severity of social impairment in natural settings, assessing social awareness, social information processing, reciprocal social communication, social anxiety/avoidance, and autistic preoccupations. This assessment will be completed by the child's parents and a classroom teacher, blind to intervention status, to reflect the opinion of more than one rater and allow for assessment of generalization across settings.
Week 0
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)
Time Frame: Week 12
The SRS measures the severity of social impairment in natural settings, assessing social awareness, social information processing, reciprocal social communication, social anxiety/avoidance, and autistic preoccupations. This assessment will be completed by the child's parents and a classroom teacher, blind to intervention status, to reflect the opinion of more than one rater and allow for assessment of generalization across settings.
Week 12
Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)
Time Frame: Week 24
The SRS measures the severity of social impairment in natural settings, assessing social awareness, social information processing, reciprocal social communication, social anxiety/avoidance, and autistic preoccupations. This assessment will be completed by the child's parents and a classroom teacher, blind to intervention status, to reflect the opinion of more than one rater and allow for assessment of generalization across settings.
Week 24
Strange Stories Task
Time Frame: Week 0
These stories assess the ability to interpret nonliteral statements. Stories requiring the interpretation of a speaker's communicative intent will be read to participants. Questions probe whether the child understands that (a) a nonliteral statement has been made and (b) the intent behind the statement (i.e., was the speaker was lying, being sarcastic, joking?)
Week 0
Strange Stories Task
Time Frame: Week 12
These stories assess the ability to interpret nonliteral statements. Stories requiring the interpretation of a speaker's communicative intent will be read to participants. Questions probe whether the child understands that (a) a nonliteral statement has been made and (b) the intent behind the statement (i.e., was the speaker was lying, being sarcastic, joking?)
Week 12
Strange Stories Task
Time Frame: Week 24
These stories assess the ability to interpret nonliteral statements. Stories requiring the interpretation of a speaker's communicative intent will be read to participants. Questions probe whether the child understands that (a) a nonliteral statement has been made and (b) the intent behind the statement (i.e., was the speaker was lying, being sarcastic, joking?)
Week 24
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland II)
Time Frame: Week 0
The Vineland II measures personal and social skills needed for everyday living. The Survey Form will be administered to the child's parents in a semi-structured interview format and the Teacher Checklist will be completed by a teacher blind to intervention status.
Week 0
Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (Vineland II)
Time Frame: Week 12
The Vineland II measures personal and social skills needed for everyday living. The Survey Form will be administered to the child's parents in a semi-structured interview format and the Teacher Checklist will be completed by a teacher blind to intervention status.
Week 12
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)
Time Frame: Week 0
Week 0
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)
Time Frame: Week 12
Week 12
Direct Observation
Time Frame: 12 weeks (during treatment sessions)
Structured direct observation procedures by blinded observers will be used to evaluate the following target behaviors: instrumental initiations, social initiations, response to initiations, and nonverbal behaviors. Direct observations will also be conducted during unstructured free-play sessions at baseline, mid-point, and endpoint.
12 weeks (during treatment sessions)
Peer generalization assessment
Time Frame: Week 0
An analogue play group will be used to evaluate generalization of treatment effects to unaffected, unfamiliar peers. The play group will consist of 4 children: 2 TD peers and 2 children with ASD (1 enrolled in CBT, 1 enrolled in social play). The analogue play session will consist of a 20-minute videotaped free-play period in which children are provided with cooperative play toys (e.g., make-believe, construction, and board games).
Week 0
Peer generalization assessment
Time Frame: Week 12
An analogue play group will be used to evaluate generalization of treatment effects to unaffected, unfamiliar peers. The play group will consist of 4 children: 2 TD peers and 2 children with ASD (1 enrolled in CBT, 1 enrolled in social play). The analogue play session will consist of a 20-minute videotaped free-play period in which children are provided with cooperative play toys (e.g., make-believe, construction, and board games).
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ting Wang, Ph.D., Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Principal Investigator: Latha Soorya, Ph.D., Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 2, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)

3
Subscribe