A Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Once-daily (q.d.) QVA149 in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (SHINE)

August 26, 2013 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A 26-week Treatment Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo and Active Controlled (Open Label) Study to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of QVA149 (110/50 μg q.d.) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

The purpose of this study is to provide pivotal efficacy and safety data for QVA149 in patients with moderate to severe COPD.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2144

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Daw Park, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Glebe, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kogarah, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nedlands, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • New lambton, Australia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pleven, Bulgaria
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Russe, Bulgaria
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Varna, Bulgaria
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ontario
      • Burlington, Ontario, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Courtice, Ontario, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mississuaga, Ontario, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Beuvry, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bourges, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ferolles-Attily, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Rennes, France
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Erfurt, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Geesthacht, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hanover, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Minden, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Witten, Germany
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Guatemala City, Guatemala
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Balassagyarmat, Hungary
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Budapest, Hungary
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Gyor, Hungary
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Komarom, Hungary
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tatabanya, Hungary
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Asahikawa, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chiba, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chuo-ku, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hachioji, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hamakita, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Himeji, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hiroshima, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Hitachi, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Itabashi, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Iwata, Japan
        • Novartis Inverstigative Site
      • Kamogawa, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kishiwada, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kiyose, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kurashiki, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Matsusaka, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Matumoto, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Minato-ku, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Moriya, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nagaoka, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nagoya, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Niigata, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Obihiro, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sakai, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sakaide, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Sapporo, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tachikawa, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Takatsuki, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tsu, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yabu, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yanagawa, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yatsushiro, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Yonezawa, Japan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bulacan, Philippines
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Las Pinas City, Philippines
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Manila, Philippines
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pasay City, Philippines
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Quezon City, Philippines
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Krakow, Poland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Proszowice, Poland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Tarnov, Poland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barnaul, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kazan, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nizhny Novgorod, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Nizhny Novogorod, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Samara, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Saratov, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ufa, Russian Federation
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bardejov, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bojnice, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bratislava, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Humenne, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kosice, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Liptovsky Hradok, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Partizanske, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Prievidza, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Spisska Nova Ves, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Trstena, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Zilina, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Zvolen, Slovakia
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Cape Town, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Durban, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Johannesburg, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lyttleton, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Pretoria, South Africa
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Alcira, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Badalona, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Canet de Mar, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Centelles, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ferrol, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Fuenlabrada, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Les Borges del Camp, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mataro, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Merida, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mostoles, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Motril, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Palma de Mallorca, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ponferrada, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Salamanca, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Salt, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Valencia, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Vic, Spain
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Basel, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Lugano, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Munchenstein, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Neuchatel, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Zurich, Switzerland
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chai-Yi, Taiwan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taichung, Taiwan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Adana, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bolu, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bursa, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Canakkale, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Denizli, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Izmir, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Kocaeli, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Manisa, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Mersin, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bath, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Blackpool, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Bradford, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Cambs, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chelmsford, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Chesterfield, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Glasgow, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Herts, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • California
      • Fullerton, California, United States, 92835
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Riverside, California, United States, 92506
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Florida
      • St. Petersburg, Florida, United States, 33707
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Michigan
      • Troy, Michigan, United States, 48085
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55402
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Missouri
      • St. Charles, Missouri, United States, 63301
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63141
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Nebraska
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68134
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28207
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43215
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Oregon
      • Medford, Oregon, United States, 97504
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97213
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29615
        • Novartis Investigative Site
    • Tennessee
      • Johnson City, Tennessee, United States, 37601
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female adults aged ≥40 yrs
  • Smoking history of at least 10 pack years
  • Diagnosis of COPD (moderate-to-severe as classified by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) Guidelines, 2008)
  • Post-bronchodilator FEV1 < 80% and ≥ 30% of the predicted normal value and post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) <70%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have had a respiratory tract infection within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1
  • Patients with concomitant pulmonary disease
  • Patients with a history of asthma
  • Any patient with lung cancer or a history of lung cancer
  • Patients with a history of certain cardiovascular co-morbid conditions
  • Patients with a known history and diagnosis of alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
  • Patients in the active phase of a supervised pulmonary rehabilitation program
  • Patients contraindicated for inhaled anticholinergic agents and β2 agonists
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: QUADRUPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: indacaterol and glycopyrronium (QVA149)
QVA149 110/50 μg capsules for inhalation delivered once daily via single-dose dry powder inhaler (SDPPI) for 26 weeks. Participants remained on a stable dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and salbutamol/albuterol was available for use as rescue medication throughout the study.
Capsules for inhalation delivered via SDDPI.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: glycopyrronium (NVA237)
NVA237 50 μg capsules for inhalation delivered once daily via single-dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI) for 26 weeks. Participants remained on a stable dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and salbutamol/albuterol was available for use as rescue medication throughout the study.
Capsules for inhalation delivered via SDDPI.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: indacaterol (QAB149)
QAB149 150 μg capsules for inhalation delivered once daily via single-dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI) for 26 weeks. Participants remained on a stable dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and salbutamol/albuterol was available for use as rescue medication throughout the study.
Capsules for inhalation delivered via SDDPI.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: tiotropium
Tiotropium 18 μg capsules for inhalation delivered once daily via HandiHaler® device for 26 weeks. Participants remained on a stable dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and salbutamol/albuterol was available for use as rescue medication throughout the study.
Capsules for inhalation delivered via HandiHaler® device.
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Matching placebo capsules for inhalation delivered once daily via single-dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI) for 26 weeks. Participants remained on a stable dose of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and salbutamol/albuterol was available for use as rescue medication throughout the study.
Placebo to match capsules for inhalation delivered via SDDPI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume In One Second (FEV1) After 26 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: 23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose Week 26
Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the 23 hour 15 minute and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose values. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline FEV1 and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose Week 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 26
Time Frame: Week 26
A trained assessor interviewed the patient and graded the degree of impairment due to dyspnea (difficulty breathing). TDI focal score is based on three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task and magnitude of effort. Each domain is scored from -3 (major deterioration) to 3 (major improvement) to give an overall TDI focal score of -9 to 9. Higher numbers indicate a better score. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with Baseline Dyspnea Index Score and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
Week 26
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 26
Time Frame: 26 weeks
SGRQ is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 51 items in three areas: symptoms (respiratory symptoms and severity), activity (activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness) and impacts (social functioning and psychological disturbances due to airway disease). The total score is 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating poorer health status. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with Baseline SGRQ and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
26 weeks
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Over 26 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The number of puffs of rescue medication taken in the previous 12 hours was record in patient diary in the morning and in the evening for 26 weeks. The total number of puffs per day was calculated and divided by the number of days with data to determine the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication for each patient. Rescue medication data recorded during the 14 day run-in was used to calculate the baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline number of puffs and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
Baseline, Week 26
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume In One Second (FEV1) After 26 Weeks of Treatment With QVA149, QAB149 and NVA237 Compared to Placebo
Time Frame: 23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose Week 26
Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the 23 hour 15 minute and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose values. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline FEV1 and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose Week 26
Trough Forced Expiratory Volume In One Second (FEV1) After 26 Weeks of Treatment With QVA149 Compared to Tiotropium
Time Frame: 23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose Week 26
Spirometry was performed according to internationally accepted standards. Trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the 23 hour 15 minute and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose values. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline FEV1 and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hour 45 minute post-dose Week 26
Baseline Transitional Dyspnea Index (BDI/TDI) Focal Score at Week 12 and Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 26

A trained assessor interviewed the patient and graded the degree of impairment due to dyspnea (difficulty breathing). BDI/TDI focal score is based on three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task and magnitude of effort and captures changes from baseline. BDI was measured at day 1 prior to the first dose with domain scores ranging from 0=very severe to 4=no impairment and a total score ranging from 0 to 12(best). TDI captures changes from baseline. Each domain is scored from -3=major deterioration to 3=major improvement to give an overall TDI focal score of -9 to 9. Higher numbers indicate a better score.

A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with Baseline Dyspnea Index Score and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators as covariates and included baseline smoking status, baseline inhaled corticosteroids and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.

Baseline, Week 12, Week 26
Percentage of Patients With a Clinically Important Improvement of at Least 1 Point in TDI Focal Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
A trained assessor interviewed the patient and graded the degree of impairment due to dyspnea (difficulty breathing) at Week 12 and Week 26. TDI focal score is based on three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task and magnitude of effort. The BDI (baseline) was measured at Day 1. The TDI captures changes from baseline. Each domain is scored from -3 (major deterioration) to 3 (major improvement) to give an overall TDI focal score of -9 to 9.
Baseline, Week 26
St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score After 12 and 26 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Week 12, Week 26
SGRQ is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 51 items in three areas: symptoms (respiratory symptoms and severity), activity (activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness) and impacts (social functioning and psychological disturbances due to airway disease). The total score is 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating poorer health status. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with Baseline SGRQ and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
Week 12, Week 26
Percentage of Patients With a Clinically Important Improvement From Baseline of at Least 4 Units in the SGRQ Total Score After 26 Weeks of Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
SGRQ is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 51 items in three areas: symptoms (respiratory symptoms and severity), activity (activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness) and impacts (social functioning and psychological disturbances due to airway disease). The total score is 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating poorer health status.
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of Nights With "No Night Time Awakenings" Over 26 Weeks
Time Frame: 26 Weeks
A day with no night time awakenings is defined from the diary data as any day where the patient did not wake up due to COPD symptoms. The percentage of nights is calculated by the number of days with no nighttime awakenings/total number of days with evaluable data X 100. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline Percent days and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
26 Weeks
Percentage of Days With "No Daytime Symptoms" Over 26 Weeks
Time Frame: 26 Weeks
A day with no day time symptoms is defined from the diary data as any day where the patient recorded no coughing, no wheezing, no sputum production and no breathlessness during the previous 12 hours (approximately 8AM to 8PM). The percentage of days is calculated by the number of days with no daytime symptoms/total number of days with evaluable data X 100. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline Percent of days and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
26 Weeks
Percentage of "Days Able to Perform Usual Daily Activities" Over 26 Weeks
Time Frame: 26 Weeks
Patients answered the question "Did your respiratory symptoms stop you performing your usual activities today?-Not at all in their daily diary. The percentage of days is calculated by the number of days patient is able to perform daily activities/total number of days with evaluable data X 100. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline Percent of Days and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
26 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Mean Daily Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication at Week 12 and Week 26
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 26
The number of puffs of rescue medication taken in the previous 12 hours was record in patient diary in the morning and in the evening for 26 weeks. The total number of puffs per day was calculated and divided by the number of days with data to determine the mean daily number of puffs of rescue medication for each patient. Rescue medication data recorded during the 14 day run-in was used to calculate the baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline number of puffs and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
Baseline, Week 12, Week 26
Change From Baseline (BL) in the Daytime and Night Time Rescue Medication Use (Number of Puffs) Over 26 Weeks
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 26
The number of puffs of rescue medication taken in the previous 12 hours was record in patient diary in the morning and in the evening for 26 weeks. The total number of puffs in the morning and evening were calculated and divided by the number of days with data to determine the mean daily number of daytime and nighttime puffs. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline number of puffs and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline (BL) ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
Baseline, Week 26
Percentage of "Days With no Rescue Medication Use" Over 26 Weeks
Time Frame: 26 Weeks
A day with no rescue medication use is defined from the diary data as any day where the patient recorded no rescue medicine use during the previous 12 hours. The percentage of days is calculated by the number of days with no rescue medicine use/total number of days with evaluable data X 100. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline number of puffs and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
26 Weeks
Standardized FEV1 (With Respect to Length of Time) Area Under the Curve (AUC) From 5 Minutes to 4 Hours at Day 1 and Week 26
Time Frame: From 5 minutes to 4 hours post-dose Day 1 and Week 26
FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Measurements were made at 5, 15, and 30 minutes; and 1, 2, and 4 hours post-dose. The standardized AUC FEV1 was calculated as the sum of trapezoids divided by the length of time. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline FEV1 and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
From 5 minutes to 4 hours post-dose Day 1 and Week 26
Standardized FEV1 (With Respect to Length of Time) Area Under the Curve (AUC) From 5 Minutes to 12 Hours at Day 1 and Week 26
Time Frame: From 5 minutes to 12 hours post-dose Day 1 and Week 26
FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Measurements were made at 5, 15, and 30 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 hours post-dose. The standardized AUC FEV1 was calculated as the sum of trapezoids divided by the length of time. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline FEV1 and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
From 5 minutes to 12 hours post-dose Day 1 and Week 26
Standardized FEV1 (With Respect to Length of Time) Area Under the Curve (AUC) From 5 Minutes to 23 Hours 45 Minutes at Week 26
Time Frame: From 5 minutes to 23 hours 45 minutes post-dose Week 26
FEV1 was measured with spirometry conducted according to internationally accepted standards. Measurements were made at 5, 15, and 30 minutes; and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 23 hours 15 minutes and 23 hours 45 minutes post-dose. The standardized AUC FEV1 was calculated as the sum of trapezoids divided by the length of time. A mixed model was used with treatment as a fixed effect with baseline FEV1 and FEV1 prior to inhalation and FEV1 60 minutes post inhalation of two short acting bronchodilators (components of reversibility at Day -14) as covariates. The model also included baseline smoking status (current/ex-smoker), baseline ICS use (Yes/No) and region as fixed effects with center nested within region as a random effect.
From 5 minutes to 23 hours 45 minutes post-dose Week 26
24 Hour Holter Monitoring in a Subset of Patients
Time Frame: Week 12, Week 26

24-hourly mean heart rate was performed using a Holter Monitor at Weeks 12 and 26 in a subgroup of patients. Mixed model: heart rate = treatment + baseline heart rate + baseline smoking status + baseline ICS use + region + center (region) + error. Center was included as a random effect nested within region.

The 24-hourly mean heart rate is the mean heart rate over the 24 hour period, derived using hourly mean heart rate beats per minute.

Week 12, Week 26
Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbation
Time Frame: 26 Weeks
Rate of moderate or severe exacerbations per year = total number of moderate or severe exacerbations / total number of treatment years
26 Weeks
Percentage of Patients With at Least One Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbation Over the 26 Week Treatment Period
Time Frame: 26 Weeks
26 Weeks
Percentage of Participants With COPD Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization or Treatment With Systemic Corticosteroids and/or Antibiotics But no Hospitalization
Time Frame: 26 Weeks
26 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 1, 2012

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 13, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 9, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Clinical Trials on indacaterol and glycopyrronium (QVA149)

3
Subscribe