A Prospective Evaluation of Thromboelastography for Identifying Coagulopathy in Severely Injured Patients (RapidTEG)

December 17, 2012 updated by: Bryan Cotton, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of thrombelastography (TEG) to predict and identify trauma patients at increased risk of receiving blood transfusion, develop multiple organ failure and mortality.

TEG has been proposed as a superior tool to rapidly diagnose and help guide resuscitation with blood products and preclinical data suggest that TEG is both more sensitive and specific than PT or PTT for coagulation abnormalities. Based on the preclinical work led by Dr. Holcomb, our hypothesis is that the Rapid TEG will help to identify these coagulopathic patients earlier, allow for rapid MT protocol activation, and assist in developing data driven blood product transfusion guidelines.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This protocol is based on the fact that approximately 30% of severely injured military and civilian patients have disturbances of coagulation immediately upon arrival to the trauma center by traditional coagulation testing. It is hypothesized that:

  1. the coagulopathy of these patients may be detected more rapidly with RapidTEG than with traditional coagulation testing (prothrombin time, PT; international normalized ratio, INR; activated partial thromboplastin time, aPTT).
  2. the disturbances in the different RapidTEG parameters will correlate with early blood product utilization.
  3. the RapidTEG parameters will correlate closely with patient outcomes.
  4. the Rapid TEG will be able to describe the changes that occur with coagulation over time and do so for patients with different injury mechanisms and severities

This group has recently completed enrollment on the PRospective, Observational, Multi-center Massive Transfusion sTudy (PROMMTT) to evaluate the process, the decision-making, and outcomes associated with MT. This trial is supported by a ten million dollar grant from the U.S. Department of Defense for the Center for Translational Injury Research (CeTIR) and it investigators to conduct a multi-site observational study of severely injured trauma patients who require blood transfusions. Through our efforts, we hope to determine the best method of identifying patients who will benefit from receiving different ratios of red blood cells to plasma to platelets. This study was also designed to evaluate existing MT protocols at ten leading trauma centers and to identify which protocols are associated with better survival. Results of this study will be used to develop a future randomized clinical trial that will test these protocols.

Building on the authors proven experience with (1) predictive scoring methods to predict massive transfusion, (2) creation and maturation of a massive transfusion protocol, and (3) design of large, multi-institutional studies, the PROMMTT investigators will conduct a prospective cohort study of severely injured patients (major trauma activations) arriving to three ACS-verified academic Level 1 Trauma Centers, in which the following 3 aims will be addressed:

  1. To determine the prevalence and severity of immediate disturbances in coagulation by both RapidTEG and conventional coagulation parameters among major trauma activations.
  2. To determine if there are specific abnormalities of RapidTEG that correlate with specific early blood product utilization.
  3. To determine if RapidTEG abnormalities, when compared to kaolin-activated TEG, PT, INR and aPTT, correlate with patient outcomes in severely injured patients.
  4. To determine the temporal relationship between RapidTEG parameters and anatomic injury, mechanism of injury, and severity of injury.

TEG has been proposed as a superior tool to rapidly diagnose and help guide resuscitation with blood products and preclinical data suggest that TEG is both more sensitive and specific than PT or PTT for coagulation abnormalities. Based on the preclinical work led by Dr Holcomb, we feel that the Rapid TEG will help to identify these coagulopathic patients earlier, allow for rapid MT protocol activation, and assist in developing data driven blood product transfusion guidelines. While the TEG machine is not new, widespread and thoughtful implementation in the trauma arena has not occurred. There are no transfusion algorithms constructed on large numbers of patients, admission TEG and PT/PTT values, transfusion amounts and patient outcomes. We feel that a logical step-by-step program that first constructs a data driven algorithm, and then validates the algorithm is the safest pathway to follow.

We plan to perform RapidTEG upon admission, at 3-hours post-admission, 6-hours post-admission, 12-hours post-admission, 24-hours post-admission, and then daily for 4 additional days. Blood samples (2 mL non-citrated fresh whole blood) will be obtained in addition to standard blood samples for major trauma patients. RapidTEG will be performed using the Thrombelastograph 5000 (Hemoscope Corporation, Niles, IL). Coagulation will be activated by tissue factor. Standard parameters will be obtained using Hemoscope software: TEG-ACT, r-time, K-time, alpha angle, maximum amplitude (mA), and LY30. In addition to RapidTEG, we plan to perform conventional kaolin-activated TEG, prothrombin time (PT), international normalized ratio (INR), activated thromboplastin time (aPTT), and platelet count using standard methods. The time from obtaining the blood sample until the time that the results are made available will also be recorded for all parameters tested. For the RapidTEG, this will include the final results for the test as well as the times that the TEG-ACT, alpha angle, and MA become available by graphical display.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94110
        • University of California - San Francisco
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Oregon Health and Science University
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Memorial Hermann Hospital - Texas Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The target population for this study is all major-trauma patients admitted to one of the three participating ACS-verified academic Level 1 trauma centers.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Major trauma patients who require the highest level of trauma team activation at each site.
  • Estimated age of 18 or higher
  • Transfers less than 6 hours post-injury Exclusion Criteria: -Children less than 18 years of age.
  • Burns > 20% of body surface area
  • CPR pre-hospital
  • Prisoners - defined as anyone directly admitted from a correctional facility

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adult trauma patients
Patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) as the highest level of acuity following a traumatic injury at three Level 1 trauma centers in the United States (UT Houston, UC San Francisco, Oregon Health Center).
The RapidTEG test will be done at the study time points (3, 6, 12, 24 hours and 4 addiitonal days).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine the prevalence and severity of immediate disturbances in coagulation by both RapidTEG and conventional coagulation parameters among major trauma activations.
Time Frame: First 5 days of hospitalization
First 5 days of hospitalization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine if there are specific abnormalities of RapidTEG that correlate with specific early blood product utilization.
Time Frame: First 5 days of hospitalization
First 5 days of hospitalization
To determine if RapidTEG abnormalities, when compared to kaolin-activated TEG, PT, INR and aPTT, correlate with patient outcomes in severely injured patients.
Time Frame: First 5 days of hospitalization
First 5 days of hospitalization
To determine the temporal relationship between rapid TEG parameters and anatomic injury, mechanism of injury, and severity of injury.
Time Frame: First 5 days of hospitalization
First 5 days of hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bryan Cotton, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

October 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 18, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2012

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coagulopathy

Clinical Trials on RapidTEG test

3
Subscribe