Omega-3 Fatty Acids For Treatment Of Young Children With Autism (OMG)

April 12, 2016 updated by: Evdokia Anagnostou

A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Omega-3 Fatty Acids in the Treatment of Young Children With Autism

This is a pilot, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids in autism. Autism, originally described by Kanner in 1943, is among the most severe of neurodevelopmental disorders. It is a Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD) affecting social and communicative functions and is also characterized by repetitive behaviors/restricted interests. It is also frequently accompanied by significant aggression, self-injury, irritability and hyperactivity, making care for these individuals an even greater challenge for families or institutional settings. Autism severely impacts the affected individual and family members, causing life-long functional impairment. In this protocol the investigators will use the terms "autism" and "autism spectrum disorder (ASD)" interchangeably to refer to Autistic disorder, Asperger Syndrome and PDD-Not Otherwise Specified (NOS).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Currently risperidone is the only medication approved the by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this disorder, and specifically for irritability associated with autism, although not all patients with autism respond to risperidone. No pharmacologic treatments have been approved for use in preschool children, although it is clear that early intervention is associated with improved outcomes. Behavioral and educational therapies play a significant role in the management of autistic symptoms. The history of alternative treatments in autism is notable for the exaggerated benefit of a variety of supplements, such as high dose vitamins (e.g. B6, magnesium), and secretin. The current widespread use of alternative/nutritional supplements to patients with autism without scientifically demonstrated efficacy, underscores the necessity for scientifically sound studies to be conducted. Complementary and alternative medical therapies (CAM) are commonly employed by families of autistic children. Recent surveys have estimated the prevalence of such use to be between 30% and 95% (1,2,3). Omega-3 fatty acids were reported to be used in 28.7% of patients (1). However, only two small case series and a very small randomized study have been reported in this population to date. The investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial of omega-3 fatty acids in preschoolers with ASD.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4G 1R8
        • Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 months to 3 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or female outpatients 2-5 years of age.
  2. Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV) criteria. DSM-IV criteria for an autism spectrum disorder, (Autistic disorder, Asperger syndrome or PDD-NOS) will be established by a clinician with expertise with individuals with ASD based on parent interview, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADO) and Autism Diagnostic Interview (ADI-R)
  3. If already receiving stable non pharmacologic educational, behavioral, dietary and or/ natural health product interventions during the preceding 3 months prior to Screening, will not electively initiate new or modify ongoing interventions for the duration of the study unless the child's condition is worsening or their turn comes up on the treatment waiting list.
  4. Have normal physical examination and laboratory test results at Screening. If abnormal, the finding(s) must be deemed clinically insignificant by the Investigator.
  5. The parents must be able to speak and understand English sufficiently to allow for the completion of all study assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients born prior to 35 weeks gestational age.
  2. Patients with any primary psychiatric diagnosis other than autism at Screening. We are aware the most primary psychiatric disorders are unlikely to be diagnosed in this age group
  3. Patients with a medical history of neurological disease, including, but not limited to, epilepsy/seizure disorder (except simple febrile seizures), movement disorder, tuberous sclerosis, fragile X, and any other known genetic syndromes, or known abnormal MRI/structural lesion of the brain.
  4. Patients with a medical condition that might interfere with the conduct of the study, confound interpretation of the study results, or endanger their own well-being. Patients with evidence or history of malignancy or any significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular (including any rhythm disorder), respiratory, renal, hepatic, or gastrointestinal disease, or coagulation deficits.
  5. Patients taking psychoactive medication(s) (e.g.,stimulants, antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiepileptics, anxiolytics, clonidine).
  6. Patients that have been off pharmacotherapy for less than 6 weeks.
  7. Patients who are participating in another clinical trial
  8. Patients on anticoagulants
  9. Patients who know that they will initiate or change nonpharmacologic interventions during the course of the study.
  10. Patients unable to tolerate venipuncture procedures for blood sampling.
  11. Patients taking Omega-3 supplements who have not discontinued treatment for six weeks prior to entering into the study.
  12. Patients who have allergies to any of the ingredients in omega-3 (study product) or the placebo.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Omega-3 Fatty Acids
Children will be administered 3.75ml of the liquid formulation of Nutra Sea high-EPA (HP) (containing 1.5 gr of EPA+DHA). The starting dose will be 1.875ml (0.75 gr of EPA+DHA) and the dose will be doubled on week 2.
Children will be administered 3.75ml of the liquid formulation of Nutra Sea HP (containing 1.5 gr of EPA+DHA). The starting dose will be 1.875ml (0.75 gr of EPA+DHA) and the dose will be doubled on week 2. The parents may choose to give this as a single dose or split it to two doses if stomach upset occurs. This formulation is double distilled and has very little fishy taste, which will make it more palatable for children and will make creating a matching placebo a simpler process.
Other Names:
  • Nutra Sea HP
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Children will be administered 3.75ml of the liquid formulation of Placebo. The starting dose will be 1.875ml and the dose will be doubled on week 2.
Children will be administered 3.75ml of the liquid formulation of Placebo. The starting dose will be 1.875ml and the dose will be doubled on week 2. The parents may choose to give this as a single dose or split it to two doses if stomach upset occurs. This formulation is double distilled and has very little fishy taste, which will make it more palatable for children and will make creating a matching placebo a simpler process.
Other Names:
  • Placebo Comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in the Pervasive Developmental Disorder-Behavioral Inventory (PDDBI) - Autism Composite Score
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 Weeks

The PDDBI measures autism symptomology. The autism composite score was used as the primary outcome measure for autism symptom severity.

PDDBI Autism Composite Scale Range:

Minimum Range = 10 (lower autism symptom severity) Maximum Range = 100 (higher autism symptom severity)

The Autism Composite is calculated from the sum of T-scores of the Sensory/Perceptual Approach Behaviours, Ritualisms/Resistance to Change, Social Pragmatic Problems, and Semantic/Pragmatic Problems domains subtracted by the sum of T-scores of the Social Approach Behaviours, and Expressive Language domain then converted into the Autism Composite as a T-score.

Mean change between baseline and week 24 is reported. A negative change indicates improvement

Baseline and 24 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Behaviour Assessment System for Children (BASC-2) - Externalizing Problems Composite
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 Weeks

The BASC-2 externalizing problems composite measures hyperactivity and aggressive behaviours.

Primary Outcome domain: Externalizing Problems composite

Externalizing Problems Composite T-Score Range:

Minimum Range: 10 (lower externalizing problems) Maximum Range: 120 (higher externalizing problems)

The Externalizing Problems composite is computed from the sum of t-scores from the hyperactivity and aggression subscales then converted into the externalizing problems composite t-score.

Mean change between baseline and week 24 is reported. A negative change indicates improvement.

Baseline and 24 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Classified as Responders by the Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 24 weeks

The CGI-I is a seven-point scale that provides a clinician rating of global improvement and as such is already inherently a measure of change. It requires the clinician to assess the degree to which the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state before the intervention.

Change is rated as:

0- Not assessed

  1. Very Much Improved
  2. Much Improved
  3. Minimally Improved
  4. No Change
  5. Minimally Worse
  6. Much Worse
  7. Very Much Worse

Participants are classified as responders if their CGI-I score was 1 or 2 and non-responders for CGI-I scores of 3 to 7.

24 weeks
Change From Baseline in the Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales (VABS) - Adaptive Functioning Composite
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 Weeks

The VABS is a measure of adaptive behavior in daily settings. Secondary measure domain: The adaptive functioning composite describes an individuals overall functioning

Adaptive Behaviour Composite Standard Score Range:

Minimum range: 20 (low adaptive functioning) Maximum range: 160 (high adaptive functioning)

The adaptive behaviour composite standard score is computed from the sum of standard scores from the communication, daily living skills, socialization and motor skills domains and converted into the adaptive behavior composite standard score.

Change in the adaptive behaviour composite standard score from baseline to week 24 is reported. Positive change indicates improvement.

Baseline and 24 Weeks
Change From Baseline in the Preschool Language Scale (PLS-4) - Total Language
Time Frame: Baseline and 24 Weeks

The PLS-4 is a language measure that provides a global assessment of a child's language functioning abilities, receptive and expressive language.

Secondary outcome measure domain: Total language standard score

Total Language Standard Score Range:

Minimum range: 50 (lower language abilities) Maximum range: 150 (higher language abilities)

The total language standard score is computed from a sum of the auditory comprehension and expressive communication standard scores, then converted into the total language standard score.

Change of total language standard scores from baseline to week 24 is reported. Positive change indicates improvement

Baseline and 24 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Evdokia Anagnostou, M.D., Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 18, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Clinical Trials on Omega-3 Fatty Acids

3
Subscribe