Determination of the Optimum Delivery Route for Botulinum Toxin A in Patients With Epiphora

September 11, 2012 updated by: Shannath Merbs, M.D., Ph.D., Merbs, Shannath, M.D., Ph.D.

Determination of the Optimum Delivery Route for the Intraglandular Administration of Botulinum Toxin A in Patients With Refractory Epiphora

Epiphora or excessive tearing is a significant disability for many affected patients diminishing their quality of life. There is a growing consensus that injection of Botulinum Toxin A (BTX-A) into the lacrimal gland provides relief in patients with hyperlacrimation secondary to aberrant regeneration of the 7th nerve, and limited evidence that it might help to reduce normal tear production in patients with epiphora from anatomic or functional outflow obstructions. BTX-A has been injected both transconjunctivally into the palpebral lobe of the lacrimal gland and transcutaneously into the orbital lobe. Both delivery routes have been successful in symptom relief with minimal complications. However, the effectiveness of transconjunctival versus transcutaneous injections has not been systematically compared. Also, whether the incidence of side effects is related to the dosage, concentration, or location of injection is unknown and has also not been systematically studied. The investigators plan to conduct a randomized clinical trial in patients with functional tearing comparing the transcutaneous delivery route of BTX-A to the transconjunctival delivery route (the most common route described in the literature). The investigators will also compare the side effect profile of each delivery route.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Wilmer Eye Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age over 18 years
  • ability to give informed consent
  • symptoms of epiphora in the setting of either a patent lacrimal outflow system or an obstructed outflow system for which the patient does not desire surgical therapy or is a poor surgical candidate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • ocular motility abnormalities
  • prior ptosis, and/or strabismus surgery
  • more than 2 mm of pre-existing ptosis
  • inability to give informed consent
  • history of a bleeding disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Transconjunctival
100 units/2ml 0.9% sodium chloride, 5 units delivered transconjunctivally into the palpebral lobe of the lacrimal gland once
Other Names:
  • Botox
100 units/2ml 0.9% sodium chloride, 5 units delivered transcutaneously into the orbital lobe of the lacrimal gland once
Other Names:
  • Botox
Active Comparator: Transcutaneous
100 units/2ml 0.9% sodium chloride, 5 units delivered transconjunctivally into the palpebral lobe of the lacrimal gland once
Other Names:
  • Botox
100 units/2ml 0.9% sodium chloride, 5 units delivered transcutaneously into the orbital lobe of the lacrimal gland once
Other Names:
  • Botox

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison of 1-minute Schirmer's test with and without anesthesia between treatment groups at baseline and follow up
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Comparison of side effect between each treatment group
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks
Comparison of average score on epiphora severity scale between groups of interest at baseline and follow-up
Time Frame: 24 weeks
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shannath Merbs, MD, PhD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

January 25, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2012

Last Verified

September 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epiphora

Clinical Trials on Botulinum Toxin Type A

3
Subscribe