Mirtazapine Treatment of Anxiety in Children and Adolescents With Pervasive Developmental Disorders

October 10, 2018 updated by: Christopher John McDougle, M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital
This study will determine the effectiveness of mirtazapine in reducing anxiety in children with autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder and Pervasive Developmental Disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

One of the areas receiving very little attention in Pervasive Developmental Disorders (PDDs) is that of anxiety. Anxiety is common in PDD, but has not yet been fully characterized. The primary objective of this study is to conduct a preliminary placebo-controlled trial of mirtazapine for the treatment of anxiety associated with PDDs. We hypothesize that mirtazapine will be safe and well tolerated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Riley Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Clinic Riley Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Lexington, Massachusetts, United States, 02421
        • Lurie Center -MassGeneral Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ages 5-17 years
  • Diagnosis of autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder or Pervasive Developmental Disorder Not Otherwise Specified (PDD NOS)
  • Clinically significant anxiety as evidenced by a Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) score of 10 or greater
  • Abbreviated intelligence quotient (IQ) greater than 50 on the Stanford Binet 5th Ed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Rett's disorder or childhood integrative disorder
  • Diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), post-traumatic stress disorder, major mood disorder, psychotic disorder, or substance use disorder
  • Presence of any past or present medical conditions that would make treatment with mirtazapine unsafe
  • Use of other antidepressants or benzodiazepines
  • Use of other psychotropic medications which are ineffective, poorly tolerated, or sub-optimal in terms of dose
  • Previous adequate trial of mirtazapine

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mirtazapine
The starting dose for subjects is 7.5 mg daily. The maximum daily dose will be 45 mg.
Subjects will receive 7.5 mg daily at the start of the trial. The dose will be increased by 7.5 mg per week for subjects weighing less than 50 kg and up to 15 mg per week for subjects weighing more than 50 kg depending on efficacy and tolerability.
Other Names:
  • Remeron
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Subjects randomized to placebo arm will receive capsules identical in size and appearance to those subjects receiving study drug. Placebo capsules contain inactive ingredients.
Subjects randomized to placebo will receive placebo for duration of the study
Other Names:
  • Sugar pill

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean 10-Week Change in Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale 5-Item Total Score, Double-blind Phase
Time Frame: Weeks Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 10
The Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale (PARS) is a clinician-rated instrument that assesses anxiety symptoms that are commonly associated with social anxiety, separation anxiety, and generalized anxiety disorders. Scaled score ranges form 0-25 with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety symptoms. Means were estimated using a repeated measures linear regression model with treatment group, study week (in categories), and their interaction as covariates, and assuming a common mean between treatment groups at baseline. Confidence intervals reflect a Bonferroni multiple testing correction accounting for the selection of two primary outcomes.
Weeks Baseline, 2, 4, 6, and 10
Proportion of Participants Who Responded to Treatment at 10 Weeks According to the Improvement Item of the Clinical Global Impression-Scale (Response Defined as CGI-I=1 or CGI-I=2)
Time Frame: Screen (Visit 1) Baseline (Visit 2) and Endpoint (Week 10)
The Clinical Global Impressions Global Improvement (CGI-I) is designed to take into account all factors to arrive at an assessment of response to treatment. The CGI-I scale ranges from 1 to 7 (1=very much improved; 2= much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse), with lower scores indicating improvement (1=very much improved and 2=much improved). In this study the CGI was focused on the target symptom of anxiety. Participants with a CGI-I score of 1 or 2 were classified as responders. The CGI-I was administered biweekly for 6 weeks and again at 10 weeks during the study. The participant who withdrew from the study before 10 weeks was not included in the calculations.
Screen (Visit 1) Baseline (Visit 2) and Endpoint (Week 10)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher J. McDougle, M.D., Indiana University School of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 18, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Autism Spectrum Disorders

Clinical Trials on Mirtazapine

3
Subscribe