iADAPT: Off Label Use of Antipsychotics in the Nursing Home

March 28, 2014 updated by: Jerry Gurwitz, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

The investigators propose to evaluate the effectiveness of 3 different methods to promote the dissemination and adoption of evidenced-based review guides into the nursing home setting. Specifically, the investigators will adapt Comparative Effectiveness Research (CER) Review products developed by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), specifically related to off-label use of atypical antipsychotic drugs, to improve their penetration into practice in the nursing home (NH) setting.

The investigators propose the following specific aims:

AIM 1: NEEDS ASSESSMENT To conduct a needs assessment for the NH setting relevant to the AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Research Summary Guide (CERSG) entitled "Off-Label Use of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs." The assessment will identify: (a) interest in and barriers to the use of the AHRQ atypical antipsychotic CERSG in the NH setting; (b) the key audiences and stakeholders that influence atypical antipsychotic drug use in NHs; and (c) approaches to integrating comparative effectiveness research products into the NH setting.

AIM 2: PRODUCTION OF THE TOOLKIT Guided by the needs assessment, the investigators will produce a toolkit containing tailored CERSG-based products targeting key audiences and stakeholders in the NH setting. The target audience(s) of the final CERSG-based products will be identified in Aim 1, and will potentially include: (a) facility leadership [NH administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing]; (b) prescribers and consultant pharmacists; (c) nursing staff [registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nurse assistants].

AIM 3: EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TOOLKIT To evaluate the effectiveness of the toolkit and three dissemination strategies using a matched, cluster randomized trial. NHs in the first arm will receive the toolkit only and web access to the materials; NHs in the second arm will receive the toolkit, web access, periodic audit and feedback reports of antipsychotic prescribing to NH leadership, and faxed educational messages adapted from the AHRQ atypical antipsychotic CERSG to prescribers; and NHs in the third arm will receive the previous items plus face-to-face academic detailing. Primary outcomes of the evaluation are the RE-AIM evaluation domains (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance).The investigators will also include an assessment of facility-level changes in the use of atypical antipsychotic drugs.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Rocky Hill, Connecticut, United States, 06067
        • Qualidigm

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Qualidigm-affiliated Nursing Home facilities in Connecticut who agree to participate.

Participants in this study will include residents and employees of participating nursing homes or residents within these nursing homes. All members of this study population will be 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not meet inclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 1. Toolkit only with Web Access
NHs in this arm will receive the toolkit only and web access to the materials.
NHs in this arm will receive a letter announcing the availability of an atypical antipsychotic toolkit within the facility and online at the Qualidigm website. The letter will be sent to the NH administrator, Director of Nursing, and Medical Director of each facility by Qualidigm. It will state that the toolkit is designed to provide NH staff, including prescribers, leadership, nursing staff, and patients' families with information about the use, risks and costs of atypical antipsychotics in the NH setting.
Active Comparator: Arm 2.Toolkit, Audit/Feedback, Education
NHs in the second arm will receive the toolkit, web access, periodic audit and feedback reports of antipsychotic prescribing to NH leadership, and faxed educational messages adapted from the AHRQ atypical antipsychotic CERSG to prescribers.
Providing healthcare professionals with data about their performance (audit and feedback) may help improve their practice. It is more effective when clinicians previously agree to review their practice. We will use an adaptation of a "Medicaid Utilization Report" developed by AM Hamer. This report will show current atypical antipsychotic prescribing rates in the NH, with comparisons to state and national levels, and information regarding summary evidence for atypical antipsychotics from the AHRQ atypical antipsychotic CERSG. Reports will be sent to the NH administrator, Director of Nursing, and Medical Director of the facilities randomized to the moderate intensity arm on an every 4-month basis.
Active Comparator: Arm 3. All above plus academic detailing
NHs in the third arm will receive the previous items plus face-to-face academic detailing.
This arm will receive the same information, toolkit, letters, and audit and feedback reports distributed to homes in the moderate-intensity arm. In addition, two visits to the NH will be scheduled by a pharmacist educator specially trained in the pharmacology of atypical antipsychotics, and communication techniques. Staff will be provided with up-to-date, unbiased information about antipsychotic use in NHs based on the AHRQ CER Review product adaptations. The educator will deliver targeted messages relevant to each stakeholder regarding roles in decision-making around the use atypical antipsychotic therapy in the NH setting. Each NH will receive up to two visits over the course of the 12-month intervention period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aim 1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT - to describe interest in and barriers to the use of the AHRQ atypical antipsychotic CERSG
Time Frame: months 4-8
Aim 1 - To conduct a needs assessment for the NH setting relevant to the AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Research Summary Guide (CERSG) entitled "Off-Label Use of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs." The assessment will identify: (a) interest in and barriers to the use of the AHRQ atypical antipsychotic CERSG; (b) the key audiences and stakeholders that influence atypical antipsychotic drug use in NHs; and (c) approaches to integrating comparative effectiveness research products into the NH setting
months 4-8
Aim 1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT - to describe the key audiences and stakeholders that influence atypical antipsychotic drug use in NHs
Time Frame: months 4-8
Aim 1 - To conduct a needs assessment for the NH setting relevant to the AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Research Summary Guide (CERSG) entitled "Off-Label Use of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs." The assessment will identify: (a) interest in and barriers to the use of the AHRQ atypical antipsychotic CERSG; (b) the key audiences and stakeholders that influence atypical antipsychotic drug use in NHs; and (c) approaches to integrating comparative effectiveness research products into the NH setting.
months 4-8
Aim 1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT - to describe approaches to integrating comparative effectiveness research products into the NH setting
Time Frame: months 4-8
Aim 1 - To conduct a needs assessment for the NH setting relevant to the AHRQ Comparative Effectiveness Research Summary Guide (CERSG) entitled "Off-Label Use of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs." The assessment will identify: (a) interest in and barriers to the use of the AHRQ atypical antipsychotic CERSG; (b) the key audiences and stakeholders that influence atypical antipsychotic drug use in NHs; and (c) approaches to integrating comparative effectiveness research products into the NH setting.
months 4-8
Aim 2 - Guided by the needs assessment, we will produce a toolkit containing tailored CERSG-based products targeting key audiences and stakeholders in the NH setting.
Time Frame: months 9-12
Aim 2 - Guided by the needs assessment, we will produce a toolkit containing tailored CERSG-based products targeting key audiences and stakeholders in the NH setting. The targets of the final CERSG-based products will be identified in Aim 1, and will potentially include: (a) facility leadership [NH administrator, Medical Director, Director of Nursing]; (b) prescribers and consultant pharmacists; (c) nursing staff [registered nurses, licensed practical nurses, and certified nurse assistants], and (d) residents and families.
months 9-12
Aim 3 - To evaluate the effectiveness of the toolkit and three dissemination strategies using a matched, cluster randomized trial
Time Frame: months 31-36
Aim 3 - To evaluate the effectiveness of the toolkit and three dissemination strategies using a matched, cluster randomized trial. Primary outcomes of the evaluation are the RE-AIM evaluation domains (reach, efficacy, adoption, implementation, and maintenance).
months 31-36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jerry H Gurwitz, MD, UMass Medical School

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Off-label Use of Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs

Clinical Trials on Toolkit only with Web Access to Online Version

3
Subscribe