Diffusion Weighted Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution Study-2 (DEFUSE-2)

April 12, 2016 updated by: Gregory W Albers, Stanford University
Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution Study 2 (DEFUSE 2) is a multi-center pilot study to determine if cerebral perfusion imaging can help identify which patients, who are ineligible for intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (iv tPA) therapy or have failed iv tPA therapy, are most likely to benefit from an endovascular clot removal procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Currently, the only approved therapy for acute stroke patients is a medication called tissue plasminogen activator (tPA). This medication is given as an intravenous infusion and can dissolve blood clots, thereby restoring blood flow to the brain. Early restoration of blood flow can prevent the permanent damage to the brain which typically occurs after a stroke. As a result, patients who achieve early restoration of blood flow have less disability than stroke patients in whom blood flow is not restored. Unfortunately, only a very small fraction of stroke patients is treated with tPA and benefits from tPA. Nationwide only 3 percent of stroke patients receive this therapy. The short treatment time-window is one of the main reasons that patients are not eligible for this treatment. Previously, tPA was only recommended in the 0 - 3 hour time window after stroke onset, but recent studies have shown efficacy our to 4 ½ hours. AHA guidelines now recommend treatment with iv tPA up to 4 ½ hrs. However, the number of stroke patients who will benefit from treatment remains small despite expansion of the time-window from 3 to 4 ½ hrs. This is the result of two main limitations of tPA. First, the majority of stroke patients present beyond the 4 ½ hour time-window and will therefore remain ineligible for treatment. Second, stroke patients who receive tPA do not always benefit because the treatment does not restore blood flow in all patients. Our research has shown that depending on the location of the blood clot, blood flow is restored in only 20 to 50% of stroke patients treated with tPA.

Patients with persistent blood vessel occlusions and no improvement in their clinical condition after receiving tPA or those arriving at the hospital outside the 4 1/2 hour time window routinely undergo mechanical clot removal to open an occluded blood vessel in the brain.

Mechanical clot removal increases the percentage of stroke patients who achieve recanalization, and as a result may increase the proportion of patients who have good clinical outcomes. However it is unclear for which stroke patients mechanical thrombectomy is most suitable. Although effective at removing blood-clots, it appears that mechanical clot retrieval is not beneficial for all patients. Whereas some patients benefit, others experience no effect, and yet others are likely harmed by mechanical clot retrieval. In order to avoid harm and maximize benefit it is important to know, prior to initiation of the mechanical clot retrieval procedure, if the procedure is likely to result in a clinical improvement. The investigators hypothesize that the response to mechanical clot retrieval can be predicted based on characteristics of an MRI scan obtained just prior to the retrieval procedure. The investigators hope to learn if new MRI techniques can help identify which patients are most likely to benefit from mechanical clot removal after receiving tPA.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

138

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine
    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
        • The Queen
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States
        • Northwestern University
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
        • Oregon Health Sciences University
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
        • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
        • University of Utah
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States
        • Swedish Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

population includes those people with acute ischemic stroke

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years and older
  2. Clinical diagnosis of ischemic stroke and a score of 5 or more points in the NIHSS.
  3. Planned to undergo intra-arterial (IA) therapy for acute hemispheric stroke (Either as primary therapy or as adjuvant therapy following intravenous tPA treatment)
  4. Planned to have a standard MRI including perfusion imaging and MR angiography of the circle of Willis (MRA) prior to IA therapy
  5. Intra-arterial thrombectomy can be started within 90 minutes of completion of MRI scan and within 12 hours of symptom onset. (Start of IA therapy is defined as the time of insertion of the femoral artery sheath; Time of brain scan is defined as the time that the scan is completed)
  6. Able to obtain informed consent (informed consent should be obtained prior to the baseline MRI scan).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any pre-existing neurological illness resulting in a modified Rankin Scale Score of 3 or higher prior to the qualifying stroke
  2. Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
NIHSS Score
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Modifies Rankin Score
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

May 9, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2016

Last Verified

April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SU-02082011-7478
  • 10752
  • R01NS039325 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebrovascular Accident

3
Subscribe