Health Related Quality of Life Effects of Off-the-shelf Computer Gaming in Alzheimer and Related Disorders Populations

Interactive games (virtual reality) have recently been the center of interest and scientific discussion in the field of cognitive and functional rehabilitation. From their entertaining and contextual aspects, off-the-shelf video games are potentially interesting tools as adjunct to the patient care, especially for maintaining instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) autonomy.

Disease and physical inactivity worsen the patient's ability in the IADLs, thus reducing health related quality of life (HRQL). This decrease in cognitive and functional abilities can be slowed down using adapted rehabilitation program.

However, there is no randomized controlled study comparing usual physical therapy to virtual reality gaming consoles such as the Nintendo Wii or the Xbox 360 Kinect.

Off-the-shelf gaming consoles offer a large range of games where cognitive and functional abilities from geriatric patients could be stimulated and consequently HRQL improved.

However, a better knowledge of the potential cognitive and functional improvement processes from virtual reality rehabilitation in institutional routine is needed to enhance the quality and the range of the available care in old adults.

This study will not only be a validation platform of virtual reality as stand alone rehabilitation process but also will assess the cost effectiveness of off-the-shelf gaming consoles in HRQL improvement of old adults.

The investigators will compare the efficacy of two off-the-shelf gaming consoles in HRQL changes of patients with Alzheimer disease and related disorders.

•Method

This study is a randomized controlled trial that comprises two study phases :

Phase one; comparing three parallel groups where therapists and assessors will be kept blind of study objectives, and Phase two, the investigators will take the most cost-effective gaming console from phase one (Nintendo Wii or Xbox 360 Kinect) and the investigators will use it as an adjunct to physical therapy compared to physical therapy alone, with respect to the same amount of rehabilitation time.

The interventions are of 120min/week for 6 weeks and a follow-up at 4 weeks after intervention.

Patients will be randomized in either Xbox 360 Kinect group - a Nintendo Wii group - or physical therapy as the 'gold' standard condition.

All groups will receive the same amount of rehabilitation time. Power and sample calculation for phase two will be based on phase one results.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Disease Alzheimer
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Kinect; Behavioral: Physical Therapy (standard); Behavioral: Balance and Gait training in Individualized sessions; Behavioral: Group Xbox Kinect

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 31
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: Robert Philippe, PhD; Phone Number: +33492034770; Email: robert.p@chu-nice.fr
• Study Contact Backup: Name: dechamps Arnaud; Email: dechamps.a@chu-nice.fr

Study Locations

• Australia
  • St Lucia, Australia
    • The University of Queensland
• France
  • Alpes-Maritimes
    • Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, France, 06001
      • CHU de Nice - 4 avenue Reine Victoria - Hôpital de Cimiez
• Netherlands
  • Nijmegen, Netherlands
    • Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Able to understand complex instruction
• Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer, Vascular or Alzheimer with cerebro-vascular components dementia.

Geriatric patients with a cognitive level as described by the MMSE between 16 and 26.

• Aged 60 and older
• Signed informed consent (patient or career)

Inclusion criteria for investigator center

• Having a recruitment line from Memory center, outpatient clinic, daycare, nursing homes and long term care
• Able to include 60 patients or more
• Have the French main investigator protocol reviewed and validated by their local ethical committee.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Other type of dementia, psychiatric patients or patients with deemed behavioural disturbances
• Patients using wheelchair for mobility
• Patient with severe deficit in alertness, vision or motor functioning.
• Bedridden patients

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

4

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group Kinect; Use of the available Kinect games on the Xbox to train balance and gait	Behavioral: Kinect; The NW group consists of the use of Nintendo Wii games that targeted upper and lower limbs as well as balance reinforcement
Active Comparator: Physical Therapy Standard; This group consists of the usual physical therapy rehabilitation with a special emphasis on lower and upper limb and balance reinforcement.	Behavioral: Physical Therapy (standard); This group consists of the usual physical therapy rehabilitation with a special emphasis on lower and upper limb and balance reinforcement.
Experimental: Group Nintendo; Use of video games available Balance and Gait training in Individualized training sessions.	Behavioral: Balance and Gait training in Individualized sessions; The NW group consists of the use of Nintendo Wii games that targeted upper and lower limbs as well as balance reinforcement.
Experimental: Group Xbox Kinect (MK); The NW group consists of the use of Nintendo Wii games that targeted upper and lower limbs as well as balance reinforcement	Behavioral: Group Xbox Kinect; The NW group consists of the use of Nintendo Wii games that targeted upper and lower limbs as well as balance reinforcement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
questionnaires on quality of life	EQ-6D; BERG test; Timed Up and Go Test and dual task TUG test; Engagement using the Observational Assessment of Engagement (OME)	16 weeks for each test

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
tests on health	Trail making Test A and B; Visual Association Test; Mini Mental State Examination; Neuropsychiatric Inventory; Apathy Inventory; Strength of lower and upper limbs using dynamometer.; Rapid stepping test; 10 meters walk test	16 weeks for each test

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Robert Philippe, PHD, CHU de Nice - CM2R - Hôpital de Cimiez - 4 avenue reine victoria - 06 003 Nice cedex 1

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: October 1, 2011
• Primary Completion (Actual): October 1, 2011
• Study Completion (Actual): January 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: June 30, 2011
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 11, 2011
• First Posted (Estimated): August 12, 2011

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): March 18, 2024
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 15, 2024
• Last Verified: June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: 11-PP-06