Vascularized Versus Non-Vascularized Bone Grafts in Treating Proximal Pole Scaphoid Non Unions

August 17, 2011 updated by: Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, Canada

Vascularized vs. Non-vascularized Bone Grafting in the Treatment of Proximal Pole Scaphoid Non Unions: A Prospective Randomized Trial

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether treatment of scaphoid non-unions with a vascularized bone grafts improves patient reported pain and disability compared to treatment with a non-vascularized bone graft. Secondary objectives are to examine if there is any difference in the overall rate and time to union, range of motion, grip strength, or complication rates between the two groups.

In addition, this is the first prospective randomized study to directly compare the two techniques. This is also the first study to use standardized methods of assessing union (based on computerized tomography), standardized methods of collecting objective patient data, and utilizing validated patient questionnaires to assess pain and disability.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The primary inclusion criterion is any scaphoid waist or proximal pole non-union in a patient receiving a recommendation for operative treatment. Non-union is defined as <10% bony union across the fracture site on sagittal computerized tomography (CT) after at least 16 weeks of appropriate non-operative treatment or morphologic features on plain x-ray and CT (resorption and sclerosis at the fracture site, significant cyst formation) confirming non-union.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • radiologic evidence of significant scaphoid non-union advanced collapse (SNAC) wrist arthritis
  • fragmentation of the proximal pole

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Vascularized Bone Graft
Patients randomized to a vascularized bone graft will undergo a 1, 2-ICRSA vascularized bone graft based upon the 1,2 supra-retinacular vessels as described by Zaidemberg . (9. Zaidemberg C, Siebert JW, Angrigiani C. A new vascularized bone graft for scaphoid nonunion. J Hand Surg. 1991; 16A: 474-478.)
Vascularized bone graft in the treatment of Scaphoid Non-Union
Active Comparator: Non-Vascularized Bone Graft
Patients randomized to the non-vascularized group will undergo trapezoidal bone grafting from the iliac crest as described by Fernandez . (10. Fernandez DL. A technique for anterior wedge-shaped grafts for scaphoid nonunions with carpal instability. J Hand Surg [Am]. 1984 Sep;9(5):733-7.)
Non-Vascularized Bone Graft in the treatment of Scaphoid Non-unions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation
Time Frame: Change in PRWE score at time of Surgery (day 1) compared to two years post operation.
Patients will fill out the patient rated wrist Evaluation Questionnaire
Change in PRWE score at time of Surgery (day 1) compared to two years post operation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Objective Measures
Time Frame: Change in strength, ROM, and Dexterity from time of surgery (day 1) compared to two years post operation.
  • ROM
  • Grip Strength
  • Dexterity
Change in strength, ROM, and Dexterity from time of surgery (day 1) compared to two years post operation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ruby Grewal, MD, FRCSC, Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph's Health Care

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2011

Last Verified

August 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HULCscaphoid

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Scaphoid Non-Unions

Clinical Trials on Vascularized Bone Graft

3
Subscribe