- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01431040
Patient Experience and Bowel Preparation for Transvaginal Surgical Management of Vaginal Prolapse
Preoperative bowel preparation for surgical management of pelvic floor disorders is performed inconsistently, and includes no prep, the use of dietary changes or bowel altering interventions. Retrospective studies of emergency colonic surgery first demonstrated a low rate of infectious complications without a bowel prep. Recently, data supporting the routine use of mechanical cleansing for elective colorectal surgery has demonstrated the surgical outcomes are similar between patients that undergo a bowel preparation versus those that do not, indicating that the long held dogma of mechanical bowel preparation should be used selectively. Despite routine use, there is a paucity of literature addressing the approach to, and/or need for preoperative bowel management at the time of vaginal reconstructive or obliterative surgery. The majority of the pelvic floor disorder population is older, tending to have more bowel dysfunction (especially symptoms of constipation) than younger women.
The aim of this study is to evaluate preoperative bowel management strategy as it relates to the total care of the vaginal surgery patients' intra-and post-operative bowel function and overall patient experience. Two commonly used pre-operative bowel prep strategies: no preoperative bowel prep versus clear fluids and 2-enema prep. The aim is to assess the value of bowel preparation or diet change in vaginal surgery, both from the physician's and patient's point of view. In this pilot study, subjects are randomized to either a clear liquid diet the day prior to surgery with 2 enemas and nothing by mouth (NPO) after midnight, or NPO after midnight without any dietary changes or enemas.
Our aims are:
*Primary - To assess the surgeons' objective intraoperative evaluation of the effects of bowel preparation (adequate visualization, stooling during case, difficulty with bowel handling) *Secondary - (1)To characterize the patients' experience and acceptance of preoperative bowel management regimen versus no preoperative bowel preparation(2) To characterize the patients' postoperative experience and determine if the preoperative bowel regimen affects time to first bowel movement/first normal stool as well as stool experience as recorded by bowel diary (3)Evaluate the incidence of complications between the two groups (4)Characterize other descriptive qualities of the patients' operative experience(duration of case, length of hospital stay)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, The Kirklin Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 19
- Female
- Undergoing transvaginal reconstructive surgical intervention for vaginal prolapse (apical suspension and posterior compartment repair required, other concurrent surgery allowed)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Male
- Pregnant, planning pregnancy, or less than 1 year from delivery
- History of total colectomy or prior ileostomy
- Inflammatory bowel disorder (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) formally diagnosed
- Inability to understand written study material (including non-English speaking)
- Inability to give consent
- Presently diagnosed colorectal cancer
- Undergoing chemotherapy and/or radiation
- Chronic constipation suggestive of colonic inertia defined as fewer that 3 stools per week (Rome III guidelines)
- Severe neurological diseases (such as Multiple Sclerosis)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Group A
Group A will have no bowel preparation and be permitted a regular diet the day prior to surgery until midnight.
|
Participants in this group will have a regular diet and no bowel prep the day prior surgery up until midnight.
|
Active Comparator: Group B
Participants in this group will consume a clear liquid diet and perform 2 Fleets enemas in the late afternoon the day before surgery and nothing after midnight.
|
Participants in this group will receive a clear liquid diet and 2 Fleets enemas in the late afternoon prior to surgery.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Surgeon assessment of bowel preparation
Time Frame: Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
The primary outcome measure will be measured using the surgeon satisfaction questionnaire which is filled out immediately post-op.
The surgeon assessment of the bowel preparation and its potential outcome on the surgical field (adequate visualization, stooling during case, and difficulty with bowel handling) will be measured.
|
Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Participant experience and acceptance of preoperative bowel management verses no preoperative bowel preparation
Time Frame: Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Participants will complete a patient assessment/satisfaction questionnaire.
|
Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Bowel Diary and Bristol Stool Scale
Time Frame: Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Participants will receive 3 seven day bowel diaries,completing one week prior to surgery, and 2 weeks post-operatively.
The Bristol Stool Scale is also included as part of the diary and participants are to record each bowel movement during the 3 week period.
The information is returned to the physician at the post-operative visit, which occurs approximately 6 weeks after surgery.
|
Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Complications between the two groups
Time Frame: Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Any complications that arise will be assessed as they occur and the incidence of complications, if any between the two groups, including wound infection (as defined by erythema, purulent material that was treated with antibiotics, re-operation, or drainage), surgical site breakdown, bowel injury or other unintended injury of adjacent anatomy will be assessed after all the procedures are completed.
|
Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Duration of the Case
Time Frame: Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
This relates to the overall operative procedure recorded in total operative time.
|
Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
The length of stays will be assessed to gather the average time of stay.
|
Will be evaluated at 1 year
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alicia C Ballard, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- X100928005
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Value of the Bowel Preparation and Diet Change Versus no Intervention
-
Queen's UniversityHotel Dieu Hospital (Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Unit)CompletedQuality of Bowel Preparation for the Colon Capsule | Colon Capsule Completion Rates | Colon Capsule Polyp DetectionCanada
-
Changhai HospitalTongji Hospital; Qilu Hospital of Shandong University; First Affiliated Hospital... and other collaboratorsCompletedAdenoma Detection Rate | Bowel Preparation Scale | the Amount of Air BubbleChina
-
Changhai HospitalUnknownAdenoma Detection Rate | Bowel Preparation Scale | the Amount of Air BubbleChina
-
PepsiCo Global R&DUnknownChange in Cognitive Function and Fatigue During Extended Performance of the Cognitive Demand Battery (CDB) at 1, 3 and 6 Hours Post Consumption | Change in Long Term Declarative Memory at 1, 3 and 6 Hours Post-intervention.United Kingdom
-
Chinese University of Hong KongRecruitingAlcohol Dependence | Multiple Sclerosis | Obesity | Diabetes Mellitus | Hepatic Encephalopathy | Irritable Bowel Syndrome | Constipation | Celiac Disease | Crohn Disease | Ulcerative Colitis | Liver Disease | Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura | Clostridium Difficile Infection | Alopecia | Autism | Multiple Organ Dysfunction... and other conditionsHong Kong
Clinical Trials on No bowel prep
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityUniversity of North CarolinaWithdrawn
-
Boston Urogynecology AssociatesUnknown
-
Randers Regional HospitalCompleted
-
University of British ColumbiaCompletedEfficacy of Bowel Preparation | Ease of Bowel Preparation and Patient TolerabilityCanada
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedPatient Satisfaction and Efficacy of Bowel-preparationSweden
-
Braintree LaboratoriesCompletedColonoscopyUnited States
-
Braintree LaboratoriesCompletedColonoscopyUnited States
-
Braintree LaboratoriesCompletedEndoscopy | Colonoscopy | Bowel PreparationUnited States
-
Medtronic - MITGCompletedCrohn's DiseaseUnited States
-
Medtronic - MITGTerminated