Selected Site Pacing to Avoid Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Cardiac Resynchronization Patients With Quadripolar Left Ventricular Leads (EffaceQ)

February 1, 2019 updated by: Abbott Medical Devices

Effectiveness and Reliability of Selected Site Pacing for Avoidance of Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in CRT Patients With Quadripolar LV Leads

Cardiac resynchronization (CRT) therapy is well established for treatment of patients with severe heartfailure, reduced left ventricular (LV) function and ventricular dyssynchrony. Roughly 1/3 of CRT patients do not improve after CRT implant. One possible reason is interruption of biventricular pacing. This might be caused by several conditions, including elevated left ventricular (LV) pacing thresholds or presence of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS). CRT devices with quadripolar LV leads offer 10 LV pacing vectors to choose from. It's the aim of this prospective observational study to investigate efficacy and reliability of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with quadripolar left ventricular leads.

Hypothesis: In more than 90% of patients, who received a CRT system with quadripolar LV lead, at least one acceptable LV lead vector is available.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Definition of an acceptable lead vector: Any LV pacing vector that complies in both tested body positions (left lateral position and sitting) with both criteria:

  1. Phrenic nerve stimulation threshold is at least twice as high as LV pacing threshold
  2. LV pacing threshold is less or equals 2.5Volts (V) @0.5 milliseconds (ms)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

337

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Coburg, Germany, 96450
        • Klinikum Coburg GmbH
      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40472
        • Krankenhaus Mörsenbroich-Rath GmbH
      • Esslingen, Germany, 73730
        • Klinikum Esslingen
      • Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 60389
        • Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien
      • Freiburg, Germany, 79106
        • Universitätsklinik Freiburg
      • Göttingen, Germany, 37073
        • Herz- und Gefäßzentrum am Krankenhaus Neu-Bethlehem
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
      • Köln, Germany, 51103
        • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk
      • Ludwigshafen, Germany, 67063
        • Klinikum der Stadt Ludwigshafen am Rhein gGmbH
      • Lünen, Germany, 44534
        • St.-Marien-Hospital GmbH
      • Magdeburg, Germany, 39130
        • Klinikum Magdeburg gGmbH
      • Marl, Germany, 45768
        • Marien-Hospital
      • München, Germany, 81377
        • Klinikum Großhadern der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
      • Münster, Germany, 48149
        • Universitatsklinikum Munster
      • Osnabrück, Germany, 49074
        • Niels-Stensen-Kliniken Marienhospital Osnabrück
      • Quedlinburg, Germany, 06484
        • Klinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben GmbH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who are planned for being implanted with a cardiac resynchronization therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillator (CRT-D) system in the participating centers.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for implantation of a CRT-D
  • Age >= 18 years
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Already implanted LV or coronary sinus lead
  • Previous unsuccessful LV lead implant attempt
  • Patient is eligible for heart transplantation
  • Comorbidities that results in life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Known pregnancy
  • Inability to provide written patient informed consent
  • Participation to another study with active treatment arm (i.e. randomized studies etc...)
  • Patient is not willing or is not able to visit the study center for the study assessments within the first 3 months after implant
  • Patient is not able to understand or answer the quality of life questionaire

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Quadripolar lead
All participants receive a CRT-D system with quadripolar lead
All participants will receive CRT-D system with a quadripolar lead. This lead offers 10 LV lead vectors to choose from
Other Names:
  • Quartet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with at least one acceptable lead vector
Time Frame: Pre hospital discharge (PHD) to 3 months

Definition of acceptable lead vector:

Any LV vector that complies in both tested body positions with both criteria:

  1. Phrenic nerve stimulation threshold is at least twice as high as LV pacing threshold
  2. LV pacing threshold is less or equals 2.5V@0.5ms
Pre hospital discharge (PHD) to 3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline to 3 months
Minnesota living with heart failure questionaire
Baseline to 3 months
Phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS)
Time Frame: PHD to 3 months
  • Incidence of PNS per LV pacing vector
  • Freedom from PNS for the permanently programmed LV vector
PHD to 3 months
LV pacing thresholds
Time Frame: PHD to 3 months
  • LV pacing thresholds per LV vector
  • Incidence of elevated (>2.5V/0.5ms) LV pacing thresholds per LV vector
PHD to 3 months
Number of acceptable LV lead vectors per patient
Time Frame: PHD to 3 months
PHD to 3 months
Finally programmed LV lead vector
Time Frame: PHD to 3 months
  • Need for reprogramming
  • Percentage of patients with conventional (bipolar) and extended (quadripolar) LV vectors
PHD to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Johannes Brachmann, Prof., Klinikum Coburg GmbH

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

December 2, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2019

Last Verified

February 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on quadripolar LV lead (Quartet)

3
Subscribe