Optimal Treatment for Spinal Cord Injury Associated With Cervical Canal Stenosis (OSCIS) Study (OSCIS)

March 29, 2021 updated by: Hirotaka Chikuda, Tokyo University

Randomized Trial of Early Versus Delayed Surgery for Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Without Bone Injury in Patients With Cervical Canal Stenosis

Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), especially those without bone injury. Although surgical decompression is often performed in SCI patients with cervical canal stenosis, efficacy and timing of surgery continues to be a subject of intense debate. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators compare two strategies: early surgery within 24 hours after admission and delayed surgery following at least 2 weeks of conservative treatment. The purpose of this study is to examine whether early surgery would result in greater improvement in motor function as compared with delayed surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan
        • The University of Tokyo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (at C5 or below) admitted within 48 hours after injury

    1. No bone injury (no fracture or instability)
    2. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Grade C
    3. Cervical canal stenosis due to preexisting conditions such as spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Unstable medical status
  2. Difficult to undergo surgery within 24 hours after admission
  3. Impaired consciousness or mental disorder that precludes neurological examination
  4. Difficult to obtain informed consent in Japanese

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early surgery
Surgery within 24 hours after admission
Active Comparator: Delayed surgery
Surgery more than 2 weeks after injury

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASIA motor score
Time Frame: baseline and one year
change from baseline to one year in the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) motor score
baseline and one year
the ability to walk without assistance
Time Frame: one year
proportion of patients who regained the ability to walk without assistance
one year
Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM)
Time Frame: one year
the total score of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version 3
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: one year
SF-36 EQ-5D
one year
Neuropathic pain
Time Frame: one year
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory
one year
Walking status
Time Frame: one year
Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) II
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hirotaka Chikuda, MD, PhD, Tokyo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 2, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

December 5, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injury

Clinical Trials on Early surgery

3
Subscribe