- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01488045
Compare Propofol to Fentanyl and Midazolam for Colonoscopy
Randomized Trial to Compare Propofol to Fentanyl and Midazolam for Colonoscopy.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background The use of colonoscopy has become an important diagnostic and therapeutic tool in the evaluation of multiple medical conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Despite its widespread use, there continues to be debate concerning the best pharmacologic approach to patient satisfaction and discomfort of the procedure and to minimize side effects.
Aim Two standard pharmacologic (Propofol or Fentanyl and low-dose Midazolam) approaches for colonoscopy will be evaluated systematically to determine if these two approaches are equivalent in terms of patient rating of satisfaction and patient discomfort to the procedure and side effects
Study Design This is a prospective randomized study of 262 participants undergoing outpatient colonoscopy at an independent academic medical center. The primary outcome of this study is participant's satisfaction, and the secondary outcome is discomfort of the patient as perceived by the physician performing the procedure.
Other Variables of Interest.
- Duration of procedure as defined by time the patient arrives in the room to the time the patient is appropriate for discharge.
- Difficulty of procedure rated by the physician on a scale of 0-10
- Colonoscopy completion rates (intubation of cecum).
- Complications including oxygen desaturation or hypotension.
- Cost of the two medication regiments
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48106
- Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age > 18
- Elective outpatient colonoscopy
- American Society of Anesthesiology Class (ASA) < IV
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18
- Inpatient status
- Emergency procedure
- History of colonic or rectal resection
- History of hypersensitivity to Propofol (or soy or egg products),Fentanyl or Midazolam
- ASA of IV
- Neurological deficit
- Acute gastrointestinal bleeding
- On anticoagulation agents
- Noncompliance with bowel regiment
- Pregnant women
- Prisoners
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Fentanyl and Midazolam
Fentanyl and Midazolam sedation for colonoscopy discomfort
|
Fentanyl will be administered IV according to standard procedure for colonoscopy.
Initial dose will consist of no more than 50µg of Fentanyl.
Patient response will be monitored for 30-60 seconds of observation before deciding to administer more Fentanyl in no more than 50µg increments.
increments.
Other Names:
Midazolam will be administered IV according to standard procedure for colonoscopy.
Initial dose will consist of no more than 2 mg of Midazolam.
Patient response will be monitored for 30-60 seconds of observation before deciding to administer more Midazolam in no more than 2 mg increments.
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Propofol
Propofol sedation for colonoscopy discomfort
|
Propofol will be administered IV according to standard procedure for colonoscopy.
The initial bolus of propofol will be up to 60 mg IV.
Patient response will be monitored for 30-60 seconds of observation before deciding to administer more sedation in 10-20 mg boluses.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient Satisfaction Scores (Absolute Value)
Time Frame: Survey administered in the recovery room up to 30 minutes following procedure ("Recovery room"), and a follow-up patient survey was carried out by telephone between 1 and 5 days postprocedure ("1-5 d postprocedure")
|
Measured by the patient using a 100-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS) [0-100%] with higher score indicating higher agreement with the statement/question.
Higher agreement scores would indicate higher satisfaction (better outcome).
|
Survey administered in the recovery room up to 30 minutes following procedure ("Recovery room"), and a follow-up patient survey was carried out by telephone between 1 and 5 days postprocedure ("1-5 d postprocedure")
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient Pain & Discomfort Rating (Absolute Value)
Time Frame: Survey administered in the recovery room up to 30 minutes following procedure ("Recovery room"), and a follow-up patient survey was carried out by telephone between 1 and 5 days postprocedure ("1-5 d postprocedure")
|
Self-reported by patient via a Visual Analog Scale [0-10], where 0=no pain, 10=worst possible pain
|
Survey administered in the recovery room up to 30 minutes following procedure ("Recovery room"), and a follow-up patient survey was carried out by telephone between 1 and 5 days postprocedure ("1-5 d postprocedure")
|
Physician Perceptions (Absolute Value)
Time Frame: Measured via physician survey within 30 minutes after the procedure
|
Self-reported Physician/Endoscopist perceptions Measured via Visual Analog Scale [0-10] of: Highest pain, Average pain, Difficulty of procedure, Bowel preparation, Patient movement.
A score of 0 on the scale=no pain/difficulty, while a score of 10=worst possible pain/difficulty/severity.
The higher the score the worse the outcome.
|
Measured via physician survey within 30 minutes after the procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert Cleary, MD, Saint Joseph Mercy Health System
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Gastroenteritis
- Colonic Diseases
- Intestinal Diseases
- Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
- Diverticulum
- Diverticular Diseases
- Diverticulosis, Colonic
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics, Intravenous
- Anesthetics, General
- Anesthetics
- Analgesics, Opioid
- Narcotics
- Tranquilizing Agents
- Psychotropic Drugs
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Adjuvants, Anesthesia
- Anti-Anxiety Agents
- GABA Modulators
- GABA Agents
- Fentanyl
- Midazolam
- Propofol
Other Study ID Numbers
- RCCS 262
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rectal Cancer
-
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer CenterNovartis Pharmaceuticals; National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Recurrent Rectal CancerUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingEvaluation of Quality of Life and Utilities Following Surgical Treatment of Stage I-IV Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IVC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteNatera, Inc.RecruitingEstablishing a ctDNA Biomarker to Improve Organ Preserving Strategies in Patients With Rectal CancerStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
Roswell Park Cancer InstituteNational Cancer Institute (NCI)WithdrawnStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Rectal AdenocarcinomaUnited States
-
OHSU Knight Cancer InstituteOregon Health and Science University; Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.RecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8United States
-
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterNatera, Inc.; The Joseph Drown FoundationRecruitingStage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage II Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v8 | Locally...United States
-
Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterCompletedStage IIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIA Colon Cancer | Stage IIIB Colon Cancer | Stage IIIC Colon Cancer | Recurrent Colon Cancer | Recurrent Rectal Cancer | Stage IVA Colon Cancer | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer and other conditionsUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMetastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage III Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIA Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IV Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVA Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Stage IVB Rectal Cancer AJCC v7 | Locally...United States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterWithdrawnRecurrent Rectal Cancer | Stage I Rectal Cancer | Stage II Rectal Cancer | Stage III Rectal Cancer
Clinical Trials on Fentanyl
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreFood and Drug Administration (FDA)CompletedPeer Review, ResearchUnited States
-
Alexza Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Completed
-
University of Maryland, BaltimoreFood and Drug Administration (FDA)Completed
-
University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterCompletedPregnancyUnited States
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...Terminated
-
University of PatrasUnknownStillborn Caesarean SectionGreece
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompleted
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityCompletedIntracranial SurgeryUnited States
-
Janssen Korea, Ltd., KoreaCompletedChronic PainKorea, Republic of