Detecting Diabetes Sooner With a Risk Survey for the Family Doctor:Comparing Internet and Traditional Methods of Communication for Patients and Doctors

February 8, 2012 updated by: McMaster University

e-Diabetes:Uptake, Patient Preferences and Clinical Outcomes Regarding Self-screening and Clinical Follow-up Using Web-based Technologies in a Large Team-based Primary Care Setting

This pilot RCT study aims to develop and evaluate the uptake, feasibility, and potential value of a strategy for web-diabetes risk assessment versus paper-based methods in an undiagnosed diabetes population over 40 years of age from all listed FHT provided through an electronic medical record database. Following randomization, intervention participants will have the option to decide to use web-based self-screening and the control group will receive only a paper-based method. There will be two options for web-based screening; one involves completion of the CAN-RISK screening tool as part of a personal health record self-management program (MyOscar) versus a one off online risk-assessment. The intervention and control group will be compared with respect to risk-assessment uptake. Educational sessions and further assessment of diabetes conducted by the clinical health care team will be offered to all participants who scored a high risk of diabetes in accordance with the CAN-RISK results. Actual numbers of diabetes cases in those with a high risk score will be compared between the intervention and control groups as well as compared to the usual method of diabetes screening in a randomly chosen non-identifiable sample from the same clinical setting in the same one year period. The assessment of patient acceptability in feasibility of the implementation of the self-screening tool will be accomplished through surveys designed to be completed by patients and staff.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

2000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 40 and over who did not have diagnosis of diabetes and no previous use of personal health record (MyOscar)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People with diabetes, and those who are already registered as MyOSCAR (personal e-health record) users

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: web-intervention group
Participants will receive access to the CAN-RISK (Canadian Diabetes Risk Assessment) questionnaire either via personal patient electronic health record or an online version
Self-risk assessment questionnaire for diabetes
NO_INTERVENTION: paper-based group
Participants allocated to paper-based will receive the CAN-RISK questionnaire for diabetes risk-assessment via paper-based
Self-risk assessment questionnaire for diabetes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient's uptake and preferences
Time Frame: 1 year

Numbers of patients participating in the self risk-assessment, and a comparison of paper versus web-based technologies will be collected.

  • Demographics of the 2 groups will be compared.
  • A user-satisfaction survey will assess patients' perceptions of the technologies. Use of necessary qualitative techniques can be considered as well.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The comparison of yield of actual diabetes detected from those who have high risk at self risk-assessment, compared to the usual diabetes detection rate in a random sample from the practice within a one year period.
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gina Agarwal, Dr., McMaster University, Department of Family Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2012

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

March 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 9, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

February 9, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2009

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on CANRISK (Canadian Diabetes Association Assessment)

3
Subscribe