Evaluation of Innovative Ultrasonic Techniques for Non-invasive Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Chronic Viral Hepatitis B or C (FIBRECHO)

February 21, 2014 updated by: University Hospital, Grenoble

The non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis B and C is now entering clinical practice. It is based on blood tests, especially FibroMetre® and Fibrotest® and on elastography with the Fibroscan®. Despite the overall satisfactory diagnostic performance for all of these tests (AUROC ranging from 0.80 to 0.90 depending on the study) for the discrimination of F≤1 versus F≥2, the positive and negative predictive values , however, are far from be perfect in a given patient. With these technique, failures are also possible and the measures do not meet quality standards that increase the risk of misclassification. It would be particularly useful to have new generation techniques with a better diagnostic performance.

In this project, in response to the problems presented above, we propose to evaluate the diagnostic performance of five innovative ultrasonic techniques for the non-invasive diagnosis of fibrosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

96

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Grenoble, France
        • University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient with an Ac-HCV positive and RNA HCV positive or AgHBs-positive,
  • naive to treatment or not receiving treatment for viral eradication in six months,
  • patient for whom a liver biopsy size less than 15 mm, regardless of the number of portal tracts present or fragments, is being considered or has been performed between two and one month before inclusion,
  • Patient affiliated to social security or similar regime,
  • patients who signed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient with anti-HIV Ac positive (latter result not older than 12 months and in the absence of risk factors)
  • chronic liver disease due to other causes than HCV (hemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, autoimmune disease, metabolic liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, exposure to toxins ...)
  • chronic alcohol consumption >30g/day in men and >20g/day in women
  • history of severe systemic disease,
  • HCV treatment with anti-viral or anti-fibrotic referred to within the last 6 months,
  • immunosuppressive therapy: corticosteroids, Imurel, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, Cellcep,
  • patient with an active implantable medical device,
  • protected person referred to in Articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the Code of Public Health

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
In patients with chronic viral hepatitis B or C, evaluate the performance for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (F≤1 versus F≥2) of elastography in mode supersonic compared with elastography (FibroScan®), the gold standard liver biopsy.
Time Frame: two years
Comparison 2-2 of areas under the ROC curve obtained for the different modalities (Fibroscan® vs Aixplorer®).
two years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compare the performance for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis of the liver contours regularity quantification and of the homogeneity of the hepatic parenchyma, and biological tests of fibrosis, the gold standard is liver biopsy.
Time Frame: two years
Comparison 2-2 of areas under the ROC curve obtained for the different modalities (Fibrotest®, Fibromètre®, Acoustic Structure Quantification, Quantification of the Surface Regularity, elastography ARFI)
two years
Evaluate the diagnostic performance of each technique (ultrasound innovative and organic) for severe fibrosis (F<3 vs F≥3) and cirrhosis (F<4 vs F≥4).
Time Frame: two years
Comparison 2-2 of areas under the ROC curve obtained for the different modalities (Fibrotest®, Fibromètre®, elastography with Fibroscan®, elastography in mode supersonic, Acoustic Structure Quantification, Quantification of the Surface Regularity, elastography ARFI)
two years
Evaluate the diagnostic performance of all approaches to all stages of fibrosis took 2 by 2 (F1 vs. F2, F2 vs. F3, F3 vs. F4)
Time Frame: two years
Comparison 2-2 of areas under the ROC curve obtained for the different modalities (Fibrotest®, Fibromètre®, elastography with Fibroscan®, elastography in mode supersonic, Acoustic Structure Quantification, Quantification of the Surface Regularity, elastography ARFI)
two years
Evaluate the performance of the main diagnostic modalities chosen from previous results in the two sub-populations: patients with hepatitis B and those with hepatitis C
Time Frame: two years
Comparison of areas under the ROC curve obtained in the two sub-population (hepatisis B and C) for the main diagnostic modalities chosen from previous results.
two years
Kappa intra-observer coefficient of ultrasonic techniques
Time Frame: two years
two years
Propose, based on previous results, a hierarchical strategy for using these innovative ultrasonic techniques used in combination with Fibroscan ® and the biological tests currently available (Fibrotest ®, FibroMetre ®).
Time Frame: two years
proportion of patients correctly classified by the new strategy for each grade of fibrosis.
two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent Leroy, Pr, PhD, University Hospital, Grenoble

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 23, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 24, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2014

Last Verified

February 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DCIC 11 03

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Fibrosis

3
Subscribe