INTRuST Structured Assessment For Evaluation of TBI (SAFE-TBI) (SAFE-TBI)

Reliability and Initial Validation of the INTRuST Structured Assessment For Evaluation of TBI (SAFE-TBI)

The current study will evaluate the initial reliability and validity of a new instrument, the INTRuST Structured Assessment for Evaluation of TBI (SAFE-TBI), in three samples of Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation New Dawn (OEF/OIF/OND) veterans. The SAFE-TBI is a relatively brief measure developed by INTRuST consortium investigators and designed to be given by a trained administrator. It allows for a determination of the level of evidence for exposure to a mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) using the following categories: Strong, Moderate, Weak, or No Evidence of mild TBI. The first objective is to determine the reliability (both test-retest and inter-rater) in a sample of 100 veterans recently returned from deployment at Joint Base Lewis-McChord and Fort Bragg (Cohort 1), who have screened positive for TBI on the Post-Deployment Health Assessment. The second objective is to determine the concordance between the SAFE-TBI and the VA TBI Screen in 100 OEF/OIF/OND veterans within the Northern New England VA Research Consortium (Cohort 2). The third objective, to be carried out in a sample of 200 Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC) and Fort Belvoir Community Hospital OEF/OIF/OND patients (Cohort 3), is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the SAFE-TBI using the INTRuST study "Brain Indices of Risk for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury" initial evaluation as the "gold standard" for TBI assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

305

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20307
        • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
    • Maine
      • Augusta, Maine, United States, 04330
        • Togus Va Medical Center
    • New Hampshire
      • Manchester, New Hampshire, United States, 03104
        • Manchester VA Medical Center
    • Vermont
      • White River Junction, Vermont, United States, 05009-0001
        • White River Junction VA Medical Center
    • Virginia
      • Fort Belvoir, Virginia, United States, 22060
        • Fort Belvoir Community Hopsital (FBCH)
    • Washington
      • Fort Lewis, Washington, United States, 98431
        • Madigan Army Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cohort 1: Active duty OEF/OIF/OND military personnel ages 18-60 who have recently screened positive for TBI following deployment.

Cohort 2: OEF/OIF/OND veterans ages 18-60 who have recently screened positive for TBI.

Cohort 3: Participants ages 18-60 in the INTRuST Consortium Brain Indices Study at WRNMMC or FBCH.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Cohort 1:

  1. Military personnel returning to Joint Base Lewis-McChord and Fort Bragg from deployment in support of OEF/OIF/OND between the ages of 18-60.
  2. Screen positive on the PDHA TBI screen and referred to the Madigan Army Medical Center TBI clinic and Womack Army Medical Center.
  3. Capable of giving informed consent.

Cohort 2:

  1. Veterans of OEF/OIF/OND between the ages of 18-60, receiving care at any of the three VAMCs that comprise the Northern New England VA Research Consortium (White River Junction, VT; Manchester, NH; Togus, ME).
  2. Screen positive on the VA Level 1 TBI screen.
  3. Capable of giving informed consent.

Cohort 3:

Military Personnel participating in the INTRuST Consortium Brain Indices Study at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Fort Belvoir Community Hospital. This study has the following Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Must be a patient at WRNMMC or FBCH
  2. Must be Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) eligible.
  3. Must be diagnosed TBI positive or certified as TBI negative by a licensed medical practitioner using Department of Defense (DoD) criteria
  4. For mTBI subjects, an initial score of 13-15 on the Glasgow Coma Scale
  5. Aged 18-60

Exclusion Criteria:

Cohort 1:

  1. Speech/language deficit of sufficient severity to preclude answering interview questions
  2. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)authorization ("unable" includes cases in which the potential subject cannot read and understand English well enough to provide informed consent).

Cohort 2:

  1. Speech/language deficit of sufficient severity to preclude answering interview questions.
  2. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization ("unable" includes cases in which the potential subject cannot read and understand English well enough to provide informed consent).
  3. Second level in-depth TBI evaluation done prior to SAFE TBI interview

Cohort 3:

Exclusion criteria for Cohort will be those used in the WRNMMC and Fort Belvoir Community Hospital Brain Indices Study as follows:

  1. Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization ("unable" includes cases in which the potential subject cannot read and understand English well enough to provide informed consent).
  2. Penetrating head injury.
  3. Record of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence in the past six months as documented in medical chart.
  4. Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders -IV (SCID) reveals current or lifetime PTSD diagnosis related to life events that occurred prior to most recent deployment.
  5. Taking intravenous medications for pain; participation will be delayed until such medication has been discontinued.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Cohort 1
100 OEF/OIF/OND veterans returning to Joint Base Lewis-McChord and Fort Bragg who screen positive for TBI on the Post Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) TBI screen
Cohort 2
100 OEF/OIF/OND veterans seeking care at Northern New England VA Research Consortium (NNEVARC) VA Medical Centers (VAMCs) who screen positive for TBI on VA Level 1 TBI screen
Cohort 3
200 participants in WRNMMC and Fort Belvoir Community Hospital Brain Indices Study (100 with mild TBI; 100 without mild TBI).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Test-retest Reliability SAFE-TBI
Time Frame: Up to 6 weeks
Reliability of SAFE-TBI, as determined by test-retest and inter-rater reliability, in a sample of 100 veterans recently returned from deployment (Cohort 1) Cohort 1: The primary endpoints for this sub-study (cohort) are the degree of agreement for SAFE-TBI outcome (no evidence of TBI vs. at least, weak evidence of TBI) across the two assessment time points (initial vs. 4 to 6 weeks) as well as the two rater types TRC vs. TBIC. (Specific Aim 1).
Up to 6 weeks
Concordance Rate of Current VA Screening Instruments and the SAFE-TBI.
Time Frame: baseline
Concordance rate of current VA TBI screening instruments and the SAFE-TBI in 100 OEF/OIF/OND veterans who have screened positive for TBI (Cohort 2) Cohort 2: The primary endpoint for this sub-study is the distribution of SAFE-TBI outcome (percent assigned to each evidence category of the SAFE-TBI) in a group of veterans who have screened positive on the VA TBI screen. (Specific Aim 2).
baseline
Sensitivity and Specificity of the SAFE-TBI
Time Frame: 6-months after medical evacuation
Sensitivity = True Positives/(True Positive + False Negatives) Specificity = True Negatives/(True Negative + False Positives) Cutoff 2 = At least moderate evidence of TBI vs. no or weak evidence of TBI
6-months after medical evacuation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura A. Flashman, PhD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 3, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2016

Last Verified

March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries, Traumatic

3
Subscribe