Effect of Long-Term Electrical Stimulation on LES Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With GERD

February 12, 2025 updated by: EndoStim Inc.

An Investigation of the Effect of Long-Term Electrical Stimulation on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

The EndoStim LES Stimulation System is an investigational device intended to improve the LES pressure and restore Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) function in individuals suffering from Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

EndoStim has developed an investigational medical device specifically designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the LES and has completed two clinical feasibility studies using an external version of the EndoStim stimulation system in fifteen subjects. In these two short-term studies, electrical stimulation resulted in significant increases in LES pressure.

This study will further evaluate the safety of the procedure and its feasibility for use in this group of patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Santiago, Chile
        • Hospital Clinico de la Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
      • Bogota, Colombia
        • San Ignacio
      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) / Prince of Whales
      • Hyderabad, India, 500082
        • Asian Institute Of Gastroenterology
      • Mexico City, Mexico
        • . Zalvador Zubiran National Institute of Medical Science and Nutrition
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105
        • AMC Amsterdam
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • UMC Maastrcht
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3508
        • UMC Utrecht
    • Takapuna
      • Auckland, Takapuna, New Zealand
        • North Shore Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • St. Thomas Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is between 21 - 70 years of age.
  • Subject has a history of heartburn, regurgitation or both for > 12 month prompting physician recommendation of continual daily use of PPI before study entry.
  • Baseline GERD HRQL heartburn score following 10-14 days off PPI which is ≥ 20 and at least 10 points higher than the on PPI score
  • Subject who are on standard medical therapy for 12 months or longer and experience discomfort or who are otherwise dissatisfied with GERD symptoms
  • Subjects with a GERD condition that in the opinion of the PI justifies a minimally invasive reversible procedure prior to attempting anatomical change such as Nissen fundoplication
  • Subject has an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I or II (or comparable local classification if any).
  • Subject has exhibited excessive lower esophageal acid exposure during 24-hour pHmetry of antisecretory therapy performed within 6 months of screening visit; pH < 4 for > 5% of total time.
  • Subject has a resting LES end expiratory pressure > 5mm Hg and < 15 mm Hg on a high resolution manometry within 6 months of enrollment.
  • Subject has esophagitis ≤ Grade C (LA classification) on upper endoscopy within 6 months of enrollment.
  • Subject has esophageal body contraction amplitude > 30 mmHg for > 50% of swallows and > 50% peristaltic contractions on high resolution manometry.
  • Subject has signed the informed consent form and is able to adhere to study visit schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject has any non-GERD esophageal motility disorders.
  • Subject has gastroparesis.
  • Subject has any significant multisystem diseases.
  • Subject has an autoimmune or a connective tissue disorder (e.g. scleroderma, dermatomyositis, Calcinosis-Raynaud's-Esophagus, Sclerodactyly Syndrome (CREST), Sjogren's Syndrome, Sharp's Syndrome), requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
  • Subject has Barrett's epithelium (> M2; > C1) or any grade of dysplasia.
  • Subject has a hiatal hernia larger than 3 cm.
  • Subject has a body mass index (BMI) greater than 35 kg/m2.
  • Subject has Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Subject has uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) defined as HbA1c > 9.5 in the previous 6 months, or has T2DM for > 10 years.
  • Subject has a history of suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer.
  • Subject has esophageal or gastric varices.
  • Subject has significant cardiac arrhythmia or ectopy or significant cardiovascular disease.
  • Subject has an existing implanted electrical stimulator (e.g., pacemaker, AICD).
  • Subject requires chronic anticoagulant therapy.
  • Subject has dysphagia or esophageal peptic stricture, excluding Schatzki's ring.
  • Subject of child-bearing potential who is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the trial period.
  • Subject is currently enrolled in other potentially confounding research.
  • History of any malignancy in the last 2 years.
  • History of previous esophageal or gastric surgery, including nissen fundoplication.
  • Subject has any condition that, at the discretion of the investigator or sponsor, would preclude participation in the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Arm
EndoStim LES Stimulation System

The EndoStim LES Stimulation System comprises three components: an electrical stimulation lead, an implantable pulse generator (IPG) and an external programmer.

The IPG and stimulation lead are to be implanted within the subject's body using conventional laparoscopy. The device programmer is to be used by the study investigator and/or a technical representative.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence and severity of adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months
Safety will be assessed by incidence and severity of adverse events through 24 months of follow-up.
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in GERD-HRQL
Time Frame: Change in GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaire score when available from baseline (as measured off PPI) to 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Heartburn and regurgitation scores will be calculated separately.

Change from baseline in GERD-HRQL. The full title of this scale is GERD Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) Questionnaire. The scale is as follows, with the worst outcome scored as a 5:

0=No Symptoms

  1. Noticeable, but not bothersome
  2. Noticeable, bothersome, but not every day
  3. Bothersome daily
  4. Bothersome and affects daily activities
  5. Incapacitating to do daily activities
Change in GERD-HRQL and RDQ questionnaire score when available from baseline (as measured off PPI) to 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. Heartburn and regurgitation scores will be calculated separately.
Change in GERD symptoms
Time Frame: Changes in GERD symptoms as measured by the SF-12 questionnaire will be compared between baseline assessments and post-implant measures at 6, 12, and 24 months.

Changes in GERD symptoms measured by the SF-12 questionnaire at 6, 12, and 24 months compared to baseline.

The full name of the scale is SF-12v2® PRO Health Survey which is a short-form patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurement that captures physical and mental well-being across eight health domains, for a variety of diseases, conditions, and treatment groups. It's made of two main summary scores: the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and the Mental Component Summary (MCS). the practical ranges observed in a large U.S. general population are

  • PCS: 11.1 to 69.4
  • MCS: 7.4 to 73.2 Higher scores on both PCS and MCS indicate better health
Changes in GERD symptoms as measured by the SF-12 questionnaire will be compared between baseline assessments and post-implant measures at 6, 12, and 24 months.
Change in GERD symptoms
Time Frame: Changes in GERD symptoms as measured by the patient daily symptom-diary at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months Vs. baseline.
Change from baseline GERD symptoms measured by patient diary.
Changes in GERD symptoms as measured by the patient daily symptom-diary at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months Vs. baseline.
Change in LES pressure
Time Frame: Baseline LES end expiratory pressure (LESPpre) will be compared with the end expiratory pressure (LESPpost) at 3 and 6 months.
Change from baseline in LES baseline and expiratory pressure
Baseline LES end expiratory pressure (LESPpre) will be compared with the end expiratory pressure (LESPpost) at 3 and 6 months.
Change in GI symptoms
Time Frame: Symptoms will be compared between baseline (as measured while on and off PPI) to 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
Change from baseline in GI symptoms (while on and off PPI)
Symptoms will be compared between baseline (as measured while on and off PPI) to 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
Change in esophageal acid exposure
Time Frame: Number of reflux events >1 minute will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Change in number of reflux events > 1 minute at baseline compared to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Number of reflux events >1 minute will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Change in esophageal acid exposure
Time Frame: Number of reflux events >5 minutes will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Change in number of reflux events > 5 minutes at baseline compared to 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Number of reflux events >5 minutes will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Change in medication usage
Time Frame: The use of antisecretory medication will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
Change from baseline in antisecretory medication use
The use of antisecretory medication will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months.
Change in sleep-related quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months scores of Sleep quality questionnaire.
Change from baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) scores. The full name of the scale Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). It is a self-report questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over a one-month time interval. Each component score of the PSQI ranges from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating the greatest dysfunction or disturbance. The seven component scores are then summed to obtain a global PSQI score, which ranges from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality, with a score greater than 5 suggesting significant sleep difficulties.
Baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months scores of Sleep quality questionnaire.
Change in work productivity
Time Frame: Baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months scores of Sleep quality and Work productivity questionnaires

Change from baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire scores. The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Questionnaire is a 6-item instrument designed to measure impairments in work and activities over the past 7 days. It assesses four main domains:

  1. Absenteeism (work time missed)
  2. Presenteeism (impairment at work / reduced on-the-job effectiveness)
  3. Work productivity loss (overall work impairment / absenteeism plus presenteeism)
  4. Activity impairment It produces scores for each domain expressed as impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity
Baseline and 6, 12, and 24 months scores of Sleep quality and Work productivity questionnaires
Change in esophageal acid exposure
Time Frame: pH will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Change in percent 24-hour esophageal pH <4.0 at baseline compared to value at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.
pH will be compared between baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: A. J. Bredenoord, Dr. med., Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Principal Investigator: T. Horbach, PD. Dr. med., Stadtkrankenhaus Schwabach, Schwabach, Germany
  • Principal Investigator: A. Escalona, Dr. med., Hospital Clinico de la Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • Principal Investigator: Nageshwar Reddy, M.D.,, Asian Institute Of Gastroenterology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

April 10, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Clinical Trials on EndoStim LES Stimulation System

Subscribe