Multi-modal Neuroimaging in Alzheimer's Disease (IMAP+)

December 1, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Caen

Study of the Predictive Markers and the Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Alzheimer's Disease: Transverse and Longitudinal Approach in Anatomical and Functional Multimodal Imaging

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major public health problem due to its socio-economic weight. An early diagnosis of AD is urgently needed as it would constitute a determinant breakthrough from a social, financial and research standpoints. Therefore, the investigators need predictive markers of AD, and neuroimaging is a particularly promising tool, especially when using complementary neuroimaging techniques and a longitudinal design, allowing to assess the relationships between the different biomarkers of the disease, their dynamic and their chronology.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The three main objectives of this project are:

  • To Identify, compare and combine the predictive markers of AD,
  • To better understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms of AD,
  • To study the ability of different neuroimaging techniques to monitor AD's evolution.

For these purposes, detailed neuropsychological evaluations, biological measures and brain structural & functional imaging measures are associated for a fully-comprehensive description of the different manifestations of AD through disease progression and toward identifying early markers.

Subjects are evaluated using neuropsychological tests of episodic memory (encoding vs. retrieval), executive functions (inhibition, flexibility, and updating processes), self-judgment, theory of mind, mental imagery and verbal fluency. A FDG-PET measure of resting state glucose consumption, an AV45-PET measure of amyloid deposition as well as anatomical, resting-state and activation fMRI scans are performed for each volonteer. In addition, blood and cerebro-spinal fluid samples will be performed to determine different biomarkers (Aβ1-40, Aβ1-42 and tPA as circulating blood proteins and Aβ40, Aβ42, tau and its phosphorylated form in CSF). The investigators also study the polymorphism of Apolipoprotein E as a genetic risk factor of AD.

One hundred and twenty healthy controls (40 young, 40 middle age and 40 elderly), 40 Mild Cognitive Impairment patients (MCI; i.e. isolated memory impairment and increased risk of developing AD) and 30 AD patients will be selected. Participants with increased risk of developing AD and without objective evidence will be also studied: 50 asymptomatic subjects from families carrying a genetic mutation with an autosomal dominant transmission (NORMA) and 40 Subjective Cognitive Impairment patients (SCI).

Clinical follow-up of patients will be completed during 36 months (18 months for AD patients), as a neuropsychological evaluation every 6 months. Comparable neuropsychological and imaging exams will be proposed once again after 18 months for all participants as well as after 36 months for elderly controls, NORMA and SCI & MCI patients.

To study and compare the effectiveness of different in vivo markers (to predict cognitive decline in populations at risk of developing AD), each data set (i.e. modality) will be first analyzed independently from one another (intra-modality analyses), including inter-group comparisons, correlations and connectivity analyses, as well as longitudinal assessment of cognitive, biological and brain changes. Baseline data will also be analyzed in function of patient's clinical evolution to assess their predictive value. Comparisons and correlations between the different patterns of alterations will then be performed through inter-modality analyses. More specifically, the investigators will address the questions of the relationships between cognitive and cerebral alterations and structural / functional brain changes over our different patient samples, neuroimaging data sets, and through disease evolution.

This project is expected to identify specific and early markers of the MA and also to compare the diagnostic efficiency of different measures. It should contribute to better understand brain and cognitive alterations in AD. Finally, the investigators will be able to appreciate the dynamic properties of these alterations in the evolution of the disease through the longitudinal study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

242

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Caen, France, 14033
        • University Hospital Côte de Nacre
      • Caen, France, 14000
        • Inserm - EPHE - University of Caen U1077
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • University Hospital Roger Salengro
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • University Hospital Pontchaillou
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • University Hospital Rouen
      • Tours, France, 37044
        • university hospital Tours
    • Calvados
      • Caen, Calvados, France, 14000
        • GIP Cyceron

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria :

  • Education level > 7 years
  • Native language: French
  • Medical, neurological, neuropsychological and neuroradiological depth in accordance with the criteria for inclusion and exclusion-specific population, that is to say:

    • Healthy young volunteers: between 18 and 40 years old; normal performances compared to the age and the educational level for all tests of the diagnostic battery (± 1.65 SD).
    • Healthy Middle-aged volunteers: between 40 and 60 years old; without memory complaints, normal performances compared to the age and the educational level for all tests of the diagnostic battery (± 1.65 SD).
    • Healthy Elderly volunteers: over 60 years old, living at home, without memory complaints, normal performances compared to the age and the educational level for all tests of the diagnostic battery (± 1.65 SD).
    • SCI patients: over 60 years old ; memory complaints; memory complaint ; normal performances compared to the age and the educational level for all tests of the diagnostic battery (± 1.65 SD).
    • MCI patients: presenting the current criteria for amnestic MCI including: i) memory complaint, ii) deficits of the episodic memory (lower performance of at least 1.65 SD from the norm for age and cultural level for one or more scores of episodic memory and iii) normal performances compared to the age and the educational level of all other cognitive functions as memory, including tests to assess cognitive abilities.
    • Alzheimer's patients: presenting the standard criteria of NINCDS-ADRDA probable Alzheimer's disease, including abnormal global cognitive function and deficits in at least two cognitive domains identified by the diagnostic battery and a mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (MMSE ≥ 15).

Exclusion Criteria :

  • The sudden onset of cognitive impairments (as opposed to their slow and gradual installation in Alzheimer's disease)
  • A chronic neurological, psychiatric, endocrine, hepatic or infectious complaint
  • A history of major disease (an uncontrolled diabetes, a lung, heart, metabolic, hematologic, endocrine disease or a severe cancer)
  • A medication that may interfere with memory or metabolic measures
  • A alcohol or drugs abuse
  • The cons-indications to MRI (claustrophobia, metallic object in the body)
  • A predominantly left-hand (score below 50% in Edinburgh Inventory)
  • Protected adults, and persons not affiliated with a social security system will not participate in this study
  • The inclusion of a participant in another biomedical research protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Young controls
Neuropsycological tests including clinical and original tests to compare differences between each populations.
ELISA tests from blood samples to compare differences between each populations.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein E polymorphism as a risk factor.
Structural and functional MRI FDG-PET to compare differences between each populations.
Experimental: Middle age controls
Neuropsycological tests including clinical and original tests to compare differences between each populations.
ELISA tests from blood samples to compare differences between each populations.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein E polymorphism as a risk factor.
Structural and functional MRI FDG-PET to compare differences between each populations.
Experimental: Elderly controls
Neuropsycological tests including clinical and original tests to compare differences between each populations.
ELISA tests from blood samples to compare differences between each populations.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein E polymorphism as a risk factor.
Structural and functional MRI FDG-PET to compare differences between each populations.
Experimental: Asymptomatic subjects
Asymptomatic subjects from families carrying a genetic mutation with an autosomal dominant transmission
Neuropsycological tests including clinical and original tests to compare differences between each populations.
ELISA tests from blood samples to compare differences between each populations.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein E polymorphism as a risk factor.
Structural and functional MRI FDG-PET to compare differences between each populations.
Experimental: Subjectif Cognitive Impariment patients
Neuropsycological tests including clinical and original tests to compare differences between each populations.
ELISA tests from blood samples to compare differences between each populations.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein E polymorphism as a risk factor.
Structural and functional MRI FDG-PET to compare differences between each populations.
Experimental: Mild Cognitive Impairment patients
Neuropsycological tests including clinical and original tests to compare differences between each populations.
ELISA tests from blood samples to compare differences between each populations.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein E polymorphism as a risk factor.
Structural and functional MRI FDG-PET to compare differences between each populations.
Experimental: Alzheimer Disease patients
Neuropsycological tests including clinical and original tests to compare differences between each populations.
ELISA tests from blood samples to compare differences between each populations.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein E polymorphism as a risk factor.
Structural and functional MRI FDG-PET to compare differences between each populations.
Experimental: Non degenerative amnsesic syndrome
Neuropsycological tests including clinical and original tests to compare differences between each populations.
ELISA tests from blood samples to compare differences between each populations.
Evaluation of apolipoprotein E polymorphism as a risk factor.
Structural and functional MRI FDG-PET to compare differences between each populations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of volume change of whole brain, hippocampus and other structural MRI measures
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Rate of Decline as measured by: Cognitive Tests, Activities of Daily Living, and CDR Sum of Boxes
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Rates of change on each specified biochemical biomarker
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Rates of change of glucose metabolism (FDG-PET)
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Extent of amyloid deposition as measured by 18F-AV45
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
Group differences for each imaging and biomarker measurement
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years
APOE genotype
Time Frame: 3 years
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vincent de La Sayette, MD, University Hospital, Caen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 20, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 20, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

July 12, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 1, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on Memory assessment

3
Subscribe