Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent Versus Balloon Angioplasty Alone for the Below The Knee Arteries(SENS-BTK) (SENS-BTK)

August 12, 2019 updated by: Seung Woon Rha, Korea University Guro Hospital

Efficacy of Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent Versus Balloon Angioplasty Alone for the Below The Knee Arteries Following Successful Balloon Angioplasty Trial (Korean Vascular Intervention Multicenter Study)

The objectives of this study are to compare directly conventional balloon angioplasty alone versus. balloon angioplasty with routine stenting - that is, to determine whether angioplasty with self-expanding stent is superior to conventional balloon angioplasty - in the infrapopliteal arterial occlusive lesions of critical limb ischemia patients by collecting and analyzing the cases of each patient group in a prospective multicenter randomized clinical trial, and to clarify main factors affecting mid- and long-term clinical effects of angioplasty with self-expanding stent in the infrapopliteal arteries.

Hypothesis: Balloon PTA followed by routine stenting with self-expanding nitinol stent in critical limb ischemia patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusive lesions is superior to conventional PTA in the aspect of vascular restenosis rate.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Symptomatic critical limb ischemia (Rutherford 4 - 6)
  • Patients with signed informed consent
  • Target lesion length < 8 cm by angiographic estimation
  • Stenosis of >50% or occlusive atherosclerotic lesion of the ipsilateral infrapopliteal artery
  • Reference vessel diameter should be 2.0-4.5 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a known allergy to heparin, aspirin, or other anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapies or a bleeding diatheses or is unable, or unwilling, to tolerate such therapies
  • Patient takes warfarin
  • Patient has a history of previous life-threatening contrast media reaction
  • Patient is currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial
  • Patient is currently breast-feeding, is pregnant, or intends to become pregnant
  • Patient is mentally ill or retarded
  • Acute critical limb ischemia
  • Major bleeding history within prior 2 months
  • Severe hepatic dysfunction (> 3 times normal reference values)
  • Significant leucopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or known bleeding diathesis
  • Life expectancy <1 year due to comorbidity
  • Reference segment diameter is not suitable for available stent design
  • Previously implanted stent(s) or PTA at the same lesion site
  • Inflow-limiting arterial lesions left untreated

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Primary stenting
A group of patients who will undergo subsequent primary stenting following successful conventional balloon angioplasty
A group of patients who will undergo subsequent primary stenting following successful conventional balloon angioplasty
Other Names:
  • Xpert stent
Active Comparator: Balloon only
A group of patients who will undergo routine conventional balloon angioplasty alone without stenting
A group of patients who will undergo routine conventional balloon angioplasty alone without stenting

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Angiographic binary restenosis rate
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 6, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 19, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EV-10302

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Limb Ischemia

Clinical Trials on self-expanding nitinol stent

3
Subscribe