Posting of Basic Results of Clinical Trials (REGIST)

September 29, 2014 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

A Cohort Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effect of Sending a Reminder to Responsible Parties of Clinical Trials in the Posting of Basic Results Onto ClinicalTrials.Gov

The gap between the high number of registered trials and the few ones where results were available (in registries or in journals) has been identified as a major problem distorting the scientific evidence available. As a consequence, the FDAAA (Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act) added on September 27, 2007 a requirements policy regarding publication of summary results on the publicly accessible registry ClinicalTrials.gov. Reporting of summary results is required for "applicable clinical trials" no later than one year after the "primary completion date", i.e. the date of collection of primary outcome data on the last patient to be enrolled. 'Applicable clinical trials', is the term used in the FDAAA to designate trials that may be subject to the registration and reporting requirements.

Not complying with the reporting requirements can result in penalties, such as withholding of National Institute of Health grant or funding and civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 a day. Despite the possibility of incurring penalties for not complying with the posting requirement, compliance remains globally poor.

In this current study, the primary objective will be to test the hypothesis that sending an email looking as a survey, reminding the necessity of posting results to the trials' responsible parties registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and subject to mandatory reporting but not complying with it, will increase the results posting rate.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

According to the recommendation of 2005 by International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), clinical trials must be registered before enrolment of the first patient in a free registry recognized by the World Health Organization (WHO). The goal is to improve transparency of clinical research. The ClinicalTrials.gov trial registry, initiated subsequently to the US Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act (FDAMA) in 1997, is the widest used registry, and contains more than 121 000 studies located in 179 countries (data of March 1, 2012).

The gap between the high number of registered trials and the few ones where results were available (in registries or in journals) has been identified as a major problem distorting the scientific evidence available, and inducing publication bias. As a consequence, the FDAAA (Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act) added on September 27, 2007 a requirements policy regarding publication of summary results on the publicly accessible registry ClinicalTrials.gov. Reporting of summary results is required for "applicable clinical trials" no later than one year after the "primary completion date", i.e. the date of collection of primary outcome data on the last patient to be enrolled. 'Applicable clinical trials', is the term used in the FDAAA to designate trials that may be subject to the registration and reporting requirements. They include interventional controlled studies registered after the enactment of the FDAAA (or ongoing at this date), involving drugs, biologics, or devices (only after FDA-approved for any use), regardless of sponsorship; phases II through IV; located at least in one U.S. site.

The entity or individual responsible for registering and posting basic results is called the 'responsible party'. This term refers to the sponsor of the study or the principal investigator of the study, if so designated by a sponsor, grantee, contractor, or awardee.

In certain circumstances, delayed submission of results information with certification can be allowed. Not complying with the reporting requirements can result in penalties, such as withholding of National Institute of Health grant or funding and civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 a day. Despite the possibility of incurring penalties for not complying with the posting requirement, compliance remains globally poor.

In this current study, the primary objective will be to test the hypothesis that sending an email asking to answer a survey, reminding the necessity of posting results to the trials' responsible parties registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and subject to mandatory reporting but not complying with it, will increase the results posting rate.

The secondary objective will be to investigate the reasons given by the trials' responsible parties for not posting summary results onto the registry.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

379

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75004
        • Clinical Epidemiology Center, Hotel-Dieu

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Interventional studies of drugs, biological or devices
  • Studies which are closed and either completed or active but not recruiting anymore
  • Studies with at least one site in the USA
  • Studies registered as phase IV
  • Studies with a primary completion date or, if missing, a completion date ranging from October 2008 to January 2011
  • Studies without posted results on the registry

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Studies which are still recruiting
  • Studies which are either withdrawn or suspended
  • Studies which primary completion date is less than one year
  • Studies without a given primary completion date or completion date
  • Studies involving interventions which are neither drugs or biologics nor devices will be excluded
  • Studies whose summary results are posted
  • Studies without indication on the sponsor or the principal investigator
  • Studies whom email address of the sponsor or the principal investigator could not be found in a publicly accessible site

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Survey by email
One arm of investigators will receive the survey to answer by email, reminding the necessity of posting basic results
The intervention consists in an email to be sent to the sponsor and/or principal investigator of randomly assigned trials. This email will notify them that their trial's primary completion date is over a year old and will ask the reasons why they have not posted results on the registry. Several reasons will be proposed, and investigators or sponsors will be asked to reply by sending back an email or through a website where the same questions will appear. A follow-up email will systematically be sent 7 days after, with similar content (appendix2). The emails will be sent as direct emails, without attached files, with the edit subject "Posting basic results". The controlled group will receive no intervention.
NO_INTERVENTION: Non interventional arm
This arm will receive no intervention (no email with the survey)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportions of trials with posted results at 90 days will be compared using a chi-square test to the control group.
Time Frame: 90 days
Primary endpoint: the proportions of trials with posted results on the registry at 90 days will be compared to the control group using a chi-square test.
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportions of trials with posted results on the registry at 180 days will be compared to the control group using a chi-square test.
Time Frame: 180 days
180 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Philippe Ravaud, MD, PhD, Hotel-Dieu, Clinical Epidemiology Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 1, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 30, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PR 738

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on The Study Will Focus on no Specific Conditions

Clinical Trials on survey by email

3
Subscribe