Clinical Trial of Nebulized Hypertonic Saline to Attenuate Post-Traumatic Acute Lung Injury

January 4, 2019 updated by: Ernest E. Moore, MD, Denver Health and Hospital Authority

A Clinical Study to Determine if Nebulized Hypertonic Saline Attenuates Acute Lung Injury Following Trauma and Hemorrhagic Shock

This study evaluates the use of nebulized hypertonic saline (aerosolized salt water) as a preventive treatment for post-traumatic acute lung injury (ALI). Both animal and human research indicate that aerosolized salt water might help reduce harmful inflammation with minimal risks.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Despite over 40 years of investigation, acute lung injury (ALI) remains a leading cause of morbidity in critically ill patients, and a disease for which there is no effective pharmacologic therapy. Our group and others have focused on the anti-inflammatory effects of intravenous hypertonic saline (HTS) acting on the injured endothelium with promising results experimentally, but failed to confirm the benefit clinically. Recent work, however, has shown that inhaled or nebulized HTS targeted at the epithelium is safe and effective in treating cystic fibrosis, COPD, and neonatal bronchiolitis. Recognizing the central role of the pulmonary epithelium in ALI, nebulization has the advantage of achieving high concentrations of the therapy without producing systemic side effects. Thus, we hypothesize that nebulized hypertonic saline will attenuate acute lung injury following trauma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80204
        • Denver Health Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult 18 ≤ age ≤ 65
  • trauma with a 9 ≤ NISS ≤ 36
  • ≤10 units of RBC in the first 6 hours (as this is a major risk factor for ARDS and MOF in this population)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Direct or indirect lung injury
  • Elevated intracranial pressure requiring treatment, including but not limited to mannitol, intravenous hypertonic saline, and ventricular drainage
  • History of severe chronic respiratory disease
  • Child-Pugh Class C liver failure
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnant women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Nebulized HTS
The first 5 patients will receive 3% Nebulized hypertonic saline, the second 5 patients will receive 4.5% Nebulized hypertonic saline, the third group 6% Nebulized hypertonic saline, and the fourth group of 5 patients will receive 7% Nebulized hypertonic saline. The nebulizer is dosed 2-3 times a day for 36 hours.
The first 5 patients will receive 3% hypertonic saline in a nebulizer, the second 5 patients will receive 4.5% nebulized hypertonic saline, the third group 6% nebulized hypertonic saline, and the fourth group of 5 patients will receive 7% nebulized hypertonic saline. The nebulizer is dosed 2-3 times a day for 36 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the respiratory parameters
Time Frame: baseline and every 6 hours for 36 hours
For intubated patients - A decrease greater than 20% in PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratios will trigger DSMB review. For not intubated patients - a) the need to increase FiO2 by 10% (approximate 4 liter/minute increase) to maintain a peripheral oxygen saturation (SaO2) of 90% during nebulizer treatment; b) evidence of respiratory distress (as documented in the chart by the patient's attending) during nebulizer treatment; and c) respiratory insufficiency requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation at any point will trigger DSMB review.
baseline and every 6 hours for 36 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
death within 28 days
Time Frame: 28 days or discharge
If the rate of death within 28 days for this patient population is less than 50% the expected rate for every 5 patients based on our clinical trauma database over the past 5 years, a DSMB review will be triggered.
28 days or discharge
lung dysfunction scores
Time Frame: baseline and 28 days or discharge
Denver lung MOF score will be measure daily until discharge or 28 days, which ever is first. For every 5 patients, if the rate of lung dysfunction for this patient population is less than 50% the expected rate based on our clinical trauma database over the past 5 years, a DSMB review will be triggered.
baseline and 28 days or discharge
ventilator-free days (VFD)
Time Frame: baseline and 28 days or discharge
Ventilator free days will be tracked with 28 days as a reference. If the number of VFDs for this patient population is greater than one standard deviation of the predicted value for every 5 patients based on our clinical trauma database over the past 5 years, a DSMB review will be triggered.
baseline and 28 days or discharge
MOF scores (Denver MOF score)
Time Frame: 28 days or discharge
Denver MOF score will be recorded daily until discharge or 28 days, which ever is sooner. for every 5 patients, if the rate of MOF for this patient population is greater than one standard deviation of the predicted value for every 5 patients based on our clinical trauma database over the past 5 years, a DSMB review will be triggered
28 days or discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ernest E Moore, MD, Denver Health and Hospital Authority

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 6, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 17, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

January 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 4, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Lung Injury

Clinical Trials on Nebulized hypertonic saline

3
Subscribe