- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01682148
Comparing Lower-concentration Dysport Treatment Targeted to the Neuromuscular Junction With Current Clinical Practice (NMJ)
A Phase III Prospective, Multi-center, Randomised, Evaluator-blinded Study to Compare Neuromuscular Junction (NMJ) Targeted Technique for Dysport Injections in Upper Limb Spasticity Post Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury to the Technique Used in Current Clinical Practice
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This was a randomised, evaluator-blinded, comparative, parallel group, multicentre study, conducted in four countries (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden). For each subject, the primary efficacy assessments using MAS were performed by the same blinded evaluator, and every effort was made at each site to ensure that the MAS evaluator was the same person throughout the study. Dysport doses were to follow clinical practice for subjects suffering from upper limb spasticity position pattern type 1, 3 or 4 post stroke or traumatic brain injury.
The hypothesis for this study was that one low-concentration botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injection per muscle, centrally located in the area/band of the NMJ zones, would spread to and block the surrounding NMJ zones and be as effective as the technique used today in clinical practice. The possibility to reduce the number of injection points would decrease the risk of injection discomfort, pain and injection site bleeding for the patient. A simplified injection technique with one injection per muscle and in a defined location would also benefit physicians.
At Baseline (Visit 1), subjects were randomised to one of two treatment groups:
- Group 1: Current clinical practice technique and high-concentration dilution: Dysport 300 U/mL.
- Group 2: NMJ targeted technique and low-concentration dilution: Dysport 100 U/mL.
Each subject visited the clinic on at least three occasions:
- Baseline (Visit 1): Screening, randomisation and Dysport treatment.
- Week 4 (Visit 2): Treatment follow-up, 4 weeks after Dysport treatment.
- Week 12 (Visit 3): Treatment and study follow-up, 12 weeks after Dysport treatment.
For subjects not receiving any post study BoNT-A injection at Week 12 due to remaining treatment effect, an extra visit (Visit 4) for study follow-up was to take place at the next routine visit planned for a new BoNT-A injection, at the latest 24 weeks post study injection.
The duration of each subject's study period was at a minimum 12 weeks and maximum 24 weeks. The overall duration of the study was planned to be approximately 36 months.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Aalborg, Denmark, 9000
- Aalborg Sygehus Nord
-
Glostrup, Denmark, 2600
- Glostrup Hospital
-
Hammel, Denmark, 8450
- Regionshospitalet Hammel
-
København NV, Denmark, 2400
- Bispebjerg Hospital
-
Roskilde, Denmark, 4000
- Roskilde Hospital
-
Vejle, Denmark, 7100
- Vejle Hospital
-
Viborg, Denmark, 8800
- Regionshopsitalet Viborg
-
-
-
-
-
Joensuu, Finland, 80210
- North Karelia Central Hospital
-
Jyväskylä, Finland, 40503
- Central Hospital of Central Finland
-
-
-
-
-
Bergen, Norway, 5021
- Haukeland University Hospital
-
Skien, Norway, , 3700
- Sykehuset Telemark HF
-
-
-
-
-
Eskilstuna, Sweden, 631-88
- Mälarsjukhuset MSE
-
Göteborg, Sweden
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital
-
Halmstad, Sweden, 30185
- Hallands Sjukhus, Neurology Clinic
-
Härnösand, Sweden, 87182
- Sundsvall-Härnösand, Rehabilitation Medicine
-
Nyköping, Sweden, 61185
- Nyköpings Lasarett,
-
Stockholm, Sweden, 114 33
- Neurology Clinic Stockholm
-
Stockholm, Sweden, 18288
- Danderyds Hospital,
-
Sävar, Sweden, 91831
- Neurorehab Sävar
-
Visby, Sweden, 62184
- Rehabilitation Center Gotland
-
Ystad, Sweden, 27133
- Ystad Lasarett
-
Örnsköldsvik, Sweden, 891 89
- Örnsköldsviks Sjukhus, Neurology Clinic
-
Östersund, Sweden, 83102
- Östersunds Rehabilitation Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Provision of written informed consent prior to any study related procedures.
- Subjects male or female, aged 18 years or older.
- Upper limb spasticity post stroke or traumatic brain injury.
- Spasticity position pattern type 1, 3 or 4.
- Elbow flexor muscles spasticity MAS 2 to 3.
- At least 2 consecutive previous treatment cycles of BoNT-A for current diagnosis.
- The latest treatment cycle demonstrating good treatment efficacy where the Dysport dose administered was considered to be adequate according to Investigator judgement.
- Need of the same treatment modality in muscle (m.) brachialis, m. biceps brachii, m. brachioradialis, m. flexor carpi ulnaris, m. flexor carpi radialis as the previous treatment cycle.
- Last BoNT-A treatment 12-24 weeks ago.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor response to BoNT-A treatment, according to Investigator.
- Need of Dysport doses >800 U in the upper limb.
- Concomitant treatment with BoNT-A for other indications than spasticity.
- Any elbow flexor contracture prohibiting MAS evaluation and/or elbow flexion improvement of at least 1 step on the MAS.
- Cutaneous or joint inflammation in the affected upper limb.
- Was likely to start other spasticity treatment during the study.
- Was likely to start physiotherapy treatment during the study.
- Other ongoing neurological disorder (e.g., myasthenia gravis).
- History of dysphagia or aspiration.
- Use of agents interfering with neuromuscular transmission (e.g., aminoglycosides).
- Treated with an investigational medicinal product within 30 days before start of the study.
- Known sensitivity to BoNT-A or any components of Dysport.
- Was at risk of pregnancy or was lactating. Females of childbearing potential must have provided a negative pregnancy test (urinary human chorionic gonadotropin (U-hCG)) at Visit 1 and must have been using adequate contraception. Non-childbearing potential was defined as post-menopause for at least one year, surgical sterilisation or hysterectomy at least three months before the start of the study.
- Had a history of, or known current, problems with alcohol or drug abuse.
- Had a mental condition rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study, and/or evidence of an uncooperative attitude.
- Had abnormal Baseline findings, any other medical condition(s) or laboratory findings that, in the opinion of the investigator, might have jeopardised the subject's safety or decreased the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objective(s) of the study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: NMJ Targeted
NMJ targeted technique and low-concentration dilution (Dysport 100 U/mL).
The same number and sites of injections/deposits per muscle were given as per prestudy.
With a Dysport dilution of 300 U/mL the volume to be injected varied between 0.1 mL and 0.7 mL per muscle.
The dose and the choice of muscles involved in the elbow flexion were the same as for the last prestudy treatment.
|
Other Names:
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Current Clinical Practice
Current clinical practice technique and high-concentration dilution (Dysport 300 U/mL). A single injection per muscle was given in the midline of the band of NMJ zones. With a Dysport dilution of 100 U/mL the volume to be injected varied between 0.4 mL and 2.0 mL per muscle. The dose and the choice of muscles involved in the elbow flexion were the same as for the last prestudy treatment. |
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline for Elbow Flexors Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
|
A clinically relevant change was one level decrease on the MAS scale.
Subjects meeting the defined decrease at Week 4 were considered as responders in the primary efficacy analysis.
|
Baseline to Week 4
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline for Elbow Flexors Muscle Tone as Measured by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at Week 4 and Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
|
Increased muscle tone in elbow flexors was assessed using the MAS.
Scale ranges from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (affected part rigid in flexion or extension).
|
Baseline to Week 12
|
Change From Baseline for Elbow Flexors Muscle Tone as Measured by the MAS at Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12
|
A clinically relevant change was one level decrease on the MAS scale.
Subjects meeting the defined decrease at Week 12 were considered as responders.
|
Baseline to Week 12
|
Change From Baseline of Spasticity Related Pain Measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Assessed by the Subject
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12
|
Pain assessment using the VAS.
The VAS was a 10 cm straight horizontal line scoring scale.
Score range on VAS was from 0 to 10 where 0 indicated no pain and 10 indicated worst pain imaginable.
|
Baseline, Week 4 and Week 12
|
Injection Site Pain Measured by VAS at Day 1.
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Pain assessment using the VAS.
The VAS was a 100 mm straight horizontal line scoring scale.
Score range on VAS was from 0 to 100 where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst pain imaginable.
|
Baseline
|
Achievement of the Primary Goal Measured by Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
|
At Baseline, an agreed primary goal related to elbow flexion in one of the following categories was determined: active function, impairment, involuntary movement, mobility, pain passive function or other.
Each goal was usually rated -1, unless the subject was as bad as he/she could be in that particular goal area, in which case the Baseline score was -2.
The evaluator rated the outcome score at Week 4 or Week 12, depending on the time point defined at the baseline visit (Visit 1), using the GAS five-point scale (-2, -1, 0, +1 and +2).
|
Up to Week 12
|
Subject Global Evaluation of Treatment Effect
Time Frame: Up to Week 24
|
Comparison of treatment effect between previous (prestudy) and study treatment cycles assessed by the subject at the end of study (Week 12 up to Week 24 (Visit 3 or Visit 4)).
Categorised as follows: Much worse / Worse / Same / Better / Much better.
|
Up to Week 24
|
Investigator Preference of Injection Technique
Time Frame: Following last visit of the last subject at each site
|
When all patients at the site had completed the study (last subject last visit) a global assessment of the injection technique was to be made by the Investigators.
The following question was answered: "Based on your experience during this study, which injection technique do you prefer?"
|
Following last visit of the last subject at each site
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Nervous System Diseases
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Muscular Diseases
- Neuromuscular Manifestations
- Muscle Hypertonia
- Muscle Spasticity
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Cholinergic Agents
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Acetylcholine Release Inhibitors
- Neuromuscular Agents
- Botulinum Toxins
- Botulinum Toxins, Type A
- abobotulinumtoxinA
Other Study ID Numbers
- A-99-52120-162
- 2011-005375-16 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants.
Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Arm Spasticity
-
IpsenCompletedPost-stroke Arm SpasticityGermany, Switzerland, Netherlands, Austria, France
-
IpsenCompletedPost Stroke Arm SpasticityPoland
-
Vancouver Island Health AuthorityRecruiting
-
Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Iuliu HatieganuRecruiting
-
Nantes University HospitalCompiègne University of TechnologyCompleted
-
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de RothschildNot yet recruitingSpasticity, Muscle
-
Piramal Critical Care, Ltd.CompletedSevere SpasticityUnited States
-
University of AlbertaRecruiting
-
Ospedale Generale Di Zona Moriggia-PelasciniSuspended
-
IpsenRecruitingUpper Limb SpasticityUnited States, France, Canada, Puerto Rico
Clinical Trials on Botulinum toxin type A
-
AllerganTerminatedOveractive BladderSerbia, Turkey, Greece, Egypt, Lebanon, India
-
Daewoong Pharmaceutical Co. LTD.Completed
-
AllerganCompletedOveractive BladderPortugal, South Africa, Netherlands, Canada, Singapore, Brazil, United States, Taiwan, Italy, United Kingdom, France, Spain
-
AllerganCompletedOveractive BladderUnited Kingdom, Belgium, New Zealand, France, Russian Federation, Czech Republic, United States, Germany, Austria, Poland, Slovakia, Ukraine, Canada, Australia
-
Mentor Worldwide, LLCSynteract, Inc.CompletedGlabellar RhytidesUnited States
-
Brazilan Center for Studies in DermatologyCompletedWrinkles in Frontal AreaBrazil
-
HugelCompletedBenign Masseteric HypertrophyKorea, Republic of
-
Mentor Worldwide, LLCSynteract, Inc.CompletedGlabellar Rhytides | Frown Lines Between the EyebrowsUnited States
-
Medy-ToxCompletedCervical Dystonia
-
Seton Healthcare FamilyCompleted