Evaluation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures During Exercise (PREFFORT)

September 27, 2013 updated by: French Cardiology Society

Evaluation of Left Ventricular Filling Pressures During Exercise: Comparative Study, Catheterization Versus Echocardiography

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is common and is a real public health issue. Diagnosis, especially when there are no congestive signs, is difficult. It has been shown that many patients with suspected HFPEF had left ventricular (LV) filling pressures elevated only at exercise (normal at rest).

Using stress echocardiography and taking into account left atrial (LA) remodeling at rest as a "memory" of chronic elevation of filling pressures. We believe that it is possible to improve the noninvasive diagnosis of exercise elevation of the LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Purpose Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF) is common and is a real public health issue. Diagnosis, especially when there are no congestive signs, is difficult. It has been shown that many patients with suspected HFPEF had left ventricular (LV) filling pressures elevated only at exercise (normal at rest).

Hypothesis Using stress echocardiography and taking into account left atrial (LA) remodeling at rest as a "memory" of chronic elevation of filling pressures. We believe that it is possible to improve the noninvasive diagnosis of exercise elevation of the LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP).

Methods Prospective, monocentric and comparative study: catheterization versus echocardiography.

60 patients referred for coronary angiography will be recruited consecutively during their hospitalization.

Patients should perform a low intensity and short duration exercise, in both catheterization and echo labs (pedaling 3 minutes at 25Watts then, 3 minutes at 50W) The LVEDP will be measured invasively with a pigtail, at rest and at both levels of exercise.

Echocardiography will be performed within 24 hours after catheterization, after a full examination at rest, an identical exercise (same intensity, same duration, same position of the patient) than made in catheterization lab will be done. Following parameters will be recorded at both stress levels: trans mitral flow, mitral annular pulsed tissue Doppler imaging (both lateral and septal) and tricuspid regurgitation flow.

The doctor who will perform the echocardiographic acquisitions will not be informed of the results of catheterization. The acquisitions will be analyzed in a second time still blinded to the catheterization data.

The following echocardiographic parameters will be collected and compared to the invasive measurement of LVEDP:

  • Ratio between pulsed Doppler peak E velocity and peak Ea velocity obtained with tissue Doppler imaging (E/Ea ratio) at rest and exercise,
  • maximal LA volume indexed to body area
  • (maximal LA volume) to (maximal LV volume) ratio.
  • LA distensibility defined by: (maximal LA volume - minimal LA volume) / (minimal LA volume)
  • LA Global longitudinal strain Finally, it will be investigated whether the combined use of E/Ea ratio at exercise with LA remodeling indices (of morphology and/or function) improves the performance characteristics of diagnostic test, compared to a separate use of these parameters.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital - Cardiology Department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients hospitalized for coronary angiography
  • Sinus Rhythm
  • Left ventricular Ejection Fraction > 50%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18years
  • Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
  • Cardiac transplantation
  • Mitral stenosis
  • Mitral insufficiency >2/4
  • Severe calcification of mitral annulus
  • Mitral prothesis or mitral repair
  • aortic prothesis
  • Severe aortic stenosis
  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Acute coronary syndrom < 3 months
  • Left ventricular thrombus
  • Severe renal Failure
  • failure of radial way for coronary angiography
  • coronary lesion indicating an angioplasty
  • impossibility to perform an exercise
  • refusal or inability to sign informed consent
  • no French medical insurance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: exercise
Patients perform exercise and pression measure is performed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
E/Ea ratio
Time Frame: Day 1
E/Ea ratio as a non-invasive index of Left Ventricular and diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at exercise
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
left atrial (LA) morphology
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate left atrial (LA) morphology at rest (maximal LA volume indexed to body area, maximal LA volume to maximal LV volume ratio) as an index of Left Ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at exercise.
Day 1
LA function at rest
Time Frame: Day 1
To evaluate LA function at rest (distensibility, global longitudinal strain) as an index of Left Ventricular end diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at exercise.
Day 1
E/Ea ratio at exercise with LA remodeling indices at rest
Time Frame: Day 1
To investigate whether the combined use of E/Ea ratio at exercise with LA remodeling indices at rest (of morphology and/or function) improves the performance characteristics of diagnostic test compared to a separate use of these parameters.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nadjib Hammoudi, MD, Cardiology department - Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2013

Last Verified

September 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF)

Clinical Trials on measure of left ventricular and diastolic pressure at exercise

3
Subscribe