ENHANCED Device Programming to Reduce Therapies and Improve Quality of Life in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Patients (ENHANCED-ICD)

April 16, 2013 updated by: M. Meine

ENHANCED Device Programming to Reduce Therapies and Improve Quality of Life in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Patients: A Prospective, Single-arm Safety Monitoring Study (ENHANCED-ICD Study)

The purpose of this study is to determine whether Enhanced device programming to reduce therapies (i.e. anti tachycardia pacing (ATP) episodes and shocks (both appropriate and inappropriate)) is safe for patients implanted with an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD). The secondary objective is to examine the impact of Enhanced programming on (i) ATPs and shocks (both appropriate and inappropriate) and (ii) quality of life and distress.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

ICD therapy has become the first-line treatment for the prevention of sudden cardiac death both as primary and secondary prevention due to its proven survival benefits as compared to anti-arrhythmic drugs. However, ICD therapy is associated with a number of complications and shocks that may impair patient quality of life and well being but also influence mortality. Hence, reduction of ICD shocks by means of alternative programming of the device is paramount for improving patient-centered outcomes and mortality.

The ENHANCED-ICD study will be a prospective, single-arm safety monitoring study. All patients will receive Enhanced programming. Furthermore, patients will be asked to complete a set of standardized and validated self-report questionnaires prior to ICD implantation, at 3-, 6-, and 12 months post implantation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3508 GA
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mathias Meine, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • a primary or secondary prophylactic indication for ICD therapy according to the current European guidelines
  • implanted with a Medtronic ProtectaTM ICD/CRT-D device or any future CE-approved and market-released Medtronic ICD/CRT-D devices with SmartShock technology
  • between 18-80 years of age
  • speaking and understanding Dutch
  • providing written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a life expectancy less than 1 year
  • a history of psychiatric illness other than affective/anxiety disorders
  • on the waiting list for heart transplantation
  • insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Enhanced ICD programming
  • VT monitor: > 166/min
  • fVT: > 182/min; via VF 60/80 intervals (number of intervals to start ATP after approximately 20 s); 3 x ATP (8 stimuli, 88%, scan 20 ms); shock 1-5: 35 J; redetection 30/40 intervals.
  • VF: > 250/min; via VF 60/80 intervals (number of intervals to start therapy after approximately 15 s); 1 x ATP (8 stimuli, 88%) during charging; all shocks: 35 J; redetection 30/40 intervals
  • SVT/VT discrimination is turned on, high rate time out is "OFF"
  • SVT/VT discrimination single chamber: stability, wavelet; SVT upper rate limit: 222/min
  • SVT/VT discrimination dual/triple chamber: P/R logic, wavelet; SVT upper rate limit: 222/min
  • T wave-oversensing and lead noise discrimination is turned on in all devices.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of intervention-related safety events
Time Frame: up to 12 months
Combined safety endpoint: arrhythmic syncope/hospitalization/death/other serious adverse event.
up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of ATPs/shocks
Time Frame: 2 months post implantation
ATPs/shocks shall be further classified based on: appropriate/inappropriate; successful/unsuccessful.
2 months post implantation
Number of ATPs/shocks
Time Frame: 6 months post implantation
ATPs/shocks shall be further classified based on: appropriate/inappropriate; successful/unsuccessful.
6 months post implantation
Number of ATPs/shocks
Time Frame: 12 months post implantation
ATPs/shocks shall be further classified based on: appropriate/inappropriate; successful/unsuccessful.
12 months post implantation
Quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline
EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D)and Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12)
Baseline
Quality of life
Time Frame: 3 months post implantation
EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D)and Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12)
3 months post implantation
Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months post implantation
EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D)and Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12)
6 months post implantation
Quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months post implantation
EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) and Short Form Health Survey 12 (SF-12)
12 months post implantation
Distress
Time Frame: Baseline
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Baseline
Distress
Time Frame: 3 months post implantation
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
3 months post implantation
Distress
Time Frame: 6 months post implantation
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
6 months post implantation
Distress
Time Frame: 12 months post implantation
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
12 months post implantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mathias Meine, MD, PhD, University Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: Susanne Pedersen, PhD, Tilburg University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

October 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 17, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2013

Last Verified

April 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Arrhythmias

Clinical Trials on Enhanced ICD programming

3
Subscribe