- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01763957
Paula Method Compared to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT), for Urinary Stress Incontinence
October 10, 2013 updated by: Hadassah Medical Organization
The Effectiveness of Circular Muscle Exercise (the Paula Method) as Compared to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT), for Urinary Stress Incontinence (SUI) in Menopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The Investigators decided to examine whether the Paula method is more effective than Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) in terms of urinary leakage amount, as it measured by pad test in menopause women without an hormonal therapy.
In addition to the pad test and two urinary incontinence questionnaires, we will use other assessment tools such as; quality of life and sexual function which have been found to correlate significantly with pad test results.
These results may indicate that menopausal women with Stress Urinary Incontinence may be more successful controlling incontinence if they will practice the Paula method as compared to PFMT.
Study Overview
Status
Withdrawn
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Jerusalem, Israel
- Hadassah Medical Organization
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- women after menopause (12 months with no period)
- aged 40 or more
- have a positive pad test leakage of 1-50 grams
- no systemic or local hormonal therapy
- literate in Hebrew and/or English
Exclusion Criteria:
- women suffering from illnesses which limit physical activity (cardiac, respiratory, psychiatric or neurological disorders)
- pelvic surgery within the last 6 months
- post hysterectomy or oophorectomy genital prolapse grade 3 or higher
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT)
|
All subjects allocated to this group will receive one group lesson, 45 minute sessions once a week for twelve weeks.
All will be encouraged to practice daily for 15-45 minutes at home.
The teachers will be followed a set exercise list .
|
Active Comparator: Paula Method
|
All subjects allocated to this group will receive one group lesson, 45 minute sessions once a week for twelve weeks.
All will be encouraged to practice daily for 15-45 minutes at home.
The teachers will be followed a set exercise list.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
change in the quantity of urinary leakage, measured by the one hour pad test
Time Frame: 1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
|
To examine whether the Paula method intervention is more effective than PFMT in reducing urinary leakage in menopausal women with SUI
|
1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
change in the urinary leakage questionnaires, measured by ICIQ-UI and QUID
Time Frame: 1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
|
1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
|
|
improvement of sexual function
Time Frame: 1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
|
To evaluate the effectiveness of both methods to improve sexual function in women diagnosed with SUI
|
1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
|
improvement of quality of life
Time Frame: 1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
|
To evaluate the effectiveness of both methods to improve quality of life in women diagnosed with SUI
|
1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
March 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
March 1, 2015
Study Completion (Anticipated)
June 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 17, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 7, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
January 9, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
October 11, 2013
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 10, 2013
Last Verified
December 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Paula/PFMT-HMO-CTIL
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Quality of Life
-
Assiut UniversityUnknownImproving Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Children's National Research InstituteRecruitingProfessional Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliUniversity of BolognaActive, not recruitingImprove Quality of LifeItaly
-
B. Braun Medical SAUnknownQuality of Life of Colostomized Patient
-
Mattu UniversityCompletedBreif Description: Patients' Quality of Life ofEthiopia
-
University of South CarolinaNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)RecruitingHealth Related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
PharmanexSprim Advanced Life SciencesCompletedHealth-related Quality of LifeUnited States
-
Linkoeping UniversityRecruiting
-
South Valley UniversityActive, not recruitingDeterminants of Health-related Quality of Life for Patients After Renal Lithotripsy: PNL Versus RIRSHealth Related Quality of LifeEgypt
-
Region VästmanlandUnknownHealth Related Quality of Life
Clinical Trials on Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT)
-
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreWithdrawn
-
Pavol Jozef Safarik UniversityCompletedStress Urinary IncontinenceSlovakia
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityNHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeCompletedPelvic Organ ProlapseUnited Kingdom
-
University Hospital Plymouth NHS TrustCompletedBehaviouralUnited Kingdom
-
Giresun UniversityCompletedUrinary Incontinence | Urinary Incontinence, Stress | Pelvic Floor Disorders | Electrical StimulationTurkey
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityCompletedUrinary Incontinence
-
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto DouroUnknown
-
Norwegian School of Sport SciencesThe Research Council of Norway; University Hospital, AkershusCompletedUrinary IncontinenceNorway
-
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityNot yet recruitingStress Urinary IncontinenceHong Kong
-
Universidade Federal de Sao CarlosUnknown