Paula Method Compared to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT), for Urinary Stress Incontinence

October 10, 2013 updated by: Hadassah Medical Organization

The Effectiveness of Circular Muscle Exercise (the Paula Method) as Compared to Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT), for Urinary Stress Incontinence (SUI) in Menopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The Investigators decided to examine whether the Paula method is more effective than Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT) in terms of urinary leakage amount, as it measured by pad test in menopause women without an hormonal therapy. In addition to the pad test and two urinary incontinence questionnaires, we will use other assessment tools such as; quality of life and sexual function which have been found to correlate significantly with pad test results. These results may indicate that menopausal women with Stress Urinary Incontinence may be more successful controlling incontinence if they will practice the Paula method as compared to PFMT.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jerusalem, Israel
        • Hadassah Medical Organization

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women after menopause (12 months with no period)
  • aged 40 or more
  • have a positive pad test leakage of 1-50 grams
  • no systemic or local hormonal therapy
  • literate in Hebrew and/or English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women suffering from illnesses which limit physical activity (cardiac, respiratory, psychiatric or neurological disorders)
  • pelvic surgery within the last 6 months
  • post hysterectomy or oophorectomy genital prolapse grade 3 or higher

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT)
All subjects allocated to this group will receive one group lesson, 45 minute sessions once a week for twelve weeks. All will be encouraged to practice daily for 15-45 minutes at home. The teachers will be followed a set exercise list .
Active Comparator: Paula Method
All subjects allocated to this group will receive one group lesson, 45 minute sessions once a week for twelve weeks. All will be encouraged to practice daily for 15-45 minutes at home. The teachers will be followed a set exercise list.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the quantity of urinary leakage, measured by the one hour pad test
Time Frame: 1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
To examine whether the Paula method intervention is more effective than PFMT in reducing urinary leakage in menopausal women with SUI
1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the urinary leakage questionnaires, measured by ICIQ-UI and QUID
Time Frame: 1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
improvement of sexual function
Time Frame: 1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
To evaluate the effectiveness of both methods to improve sexual function in women diagnosed with SUI
1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
improvement of quality of life
Time Frame: 1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention
To evaluate the effectiveness of both methods to improve quality of life in women diagnosed with SUI
1) Baseline 2) After 12 weeks of exercise intervention 3) 12 months after completion of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 11, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2013

Last Verified

December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (PFMT)

3
Subscribe