Bexarotene Amyloid Treatment for Alzheimer's Disease (BEAT-AD)

February 10, 2016 updated by: The Cleveland Clinic

A Double Blind Placebo Controlled Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bexarotene in Patients With Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease

Retinoid X receptors (RXR) are nuclear receptors that have been linked to numerous metabolic pathways relevant to Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Aβ (harmful protein) production and removal. The study drug "bexarotene" is an FDA approved anti-cancer agent but is not approved for use in Alzheimer's disease. Bexarotene acts as an RXR agonist that has reduced Aβ (harmful protein) in the brain in experimental models of Alzheimer's disease.

This study aims to determine the safety and effect on abnormal proteins found in the brain (based on brain scans) of 300 mg of "bexarotene" administered for one month compared to placebo (inactive agent).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89106
        • Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or females 50 to 90 of age inclusive.
  • Diagnosis of probable AD according to National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria.
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent by either the subject or subject's legal representative.
  • Willing and able to comply with study visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests, brain imaging and other procedures.
  • Subjects must have a positive 18f-AV-45 PET scan as determined by a qualified rater.
  • Mini-Mental State Examinations (MMSE) score between 10-20 inclusive.
  • Must have a study partner who is able and willing to comply with all required study procedures.
  • Females must be postmenopausal.
  • Have at least eight years of education and should have previously (in pre-AD condition) been capable of reading, writing, and communicating effectively with others in English.
  • If receiving therapy with a cholinesterase inhibitor and/or memantine, the dose of these agents has been stable for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization
  • Normal laboratory findings at baseline including CBC, chemistry panel, serum lipids, liver functions, TSH, and vitamin B12.
  • Must consent to ApoE genotyping

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any clinically relevant neurological disorder capable of producing a dementia syndrome including Parkinson's disease, stroke, vascular dementia, dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia and others.
  • 4 or more micro-hemorrhages (amyloid-related imaging abnormalities - hemorrhage type (ARIA-H) on baseline MRI or any evidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities - effusion type (ARIA-E) (Sperling et al, 2011).
  • History of malignancy within the past five years with the exception of basal cell or squamous cell cancer, in-situ cervical cancer, or localized prostate cancer.
  • History of seizure in the past three years prior to randomization
  • Any contraindication of having brain MRI
  • Any contraindication of having PET (inability to lie flat and still for the duration of the scan, intolerance to previous PET such as hypersensitivity reaction to PET ligand or imaging agent)
  • The subject has any unstable medical illness including hypertension, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal failure, liver failure or other organ compromise.
  • Other clinically important abnormality on vital signs, physical examination, neurologic examination, laboratory results, or electrocardiogram (ECG) examination (e.g. Atrial fibrillation) that could compromise the study or be detrimental to the subject.
  • The subject has received bexarotene previously.
  • The subject has an allergy to bexarotene.
  • Has had a PET scan in the past 12 months.
  • Has had radiotherapy in the past year.
  • Have participated in an investigational drug or device study within 30 days prior to Visit 2.
  • Have been treated with immunomodulators to treat AD (vaccines, antibodies etc) within 6 months prior to visit 2
  • Unable to swallow uncrushed oral medication in capsule form
  • Have any condition or reason that, in the opinion of the investigator, which could interfere with the ability of the patients to participate or complete the trials, or places the patient at undue risk or complicates the interpretation of safety or efficacy data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Bexarotene treatment Arm

75 mg of Bexarotene BID for week 1, then increasing to 150 mg BID for weeks 2 to 4.

Weeks 5 to 8 is Open-label phase (150 mg BID for 4 weeks)

Subjects will be randomized 4:1 to receive 4 weeks of double blind treatment of either Bexarotene or Placebo
Other Names:
  • Targretin
Placebo Comparator: Placebo

1 placebo capsule BID for week 1, then increasing to 2 placebo capsules BID for weeks 2 to 4.

Weeks 5 to 8 is Open-label phase (150 mg BID for 4 weeks)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Drug-Placebo Difference in Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Composite Amyloid Burden of the Brain
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
The primary study endpoint for all subjects is the change from baseline to Week 4 in amyloid burden as measured by standard uptake units regional (SUVr) on amyloid brain imaging obtained through 18F-AV-45 PET
Baseline to Week 4
Primary Outcome by Genotype (ALL SUBJECTS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
This measures the change from baseline on treatment compared to placebo at week 4 on composite and regional beta amyloid burden according to ApoE genotype (E-4 carriers compared to E-4 non-carriers)
Baseline to Week 4
Primary Outcome by Genotype (NON ApoE4 CARRIERS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
Measures changes from baseline on treatment compared to placebo at week 4 on composite and regional Beta Amyloid burden according to ApoE genotype (NON ApoE4 CARRIERS)
Baseline to Week 4
Primary Outcome by Genotype (ApoE4 CARRIERS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
This measures the change from baseline on treatment compared to placebo at week 4 on composite and regional beta amyloid burden according to ApoE genotype (E-4 carriers)
Baseline to Week 4
Primary Outcome by Genotype (HETEROZYGOTE ApoE4 CARRIERS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
This measures the change from baseline on treatment compared to placebo at week 4 on composite and regional beta amyloid burden according to ApoE genotype (HETEROZYGOTE ApoE4 CARRIERS)
Baseline to Week 4
Primary Outcome by Genotype (HOMOZYGOTE ApoE4 CARRIERS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4

This measures the change from baseline on treatment compared to placebo at week 4 on composite and regional beta amyloid burden according to ApoE genotype (HOMOZYGOTE ApoE4 CARRIERS)

There are no homozygote ApoE4 carriers on the placebo arm, therefore no data can be presented on this arm.

Baseline to Week 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in MMSE Score in ALL Subjects From Baseline to Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
The MMSE evaluates orientation, memory, attention, concentration, naming, repetition, comprehension, and ability to create a sentence and to copy two overlapping pentagons. A lower score indicates more cognitive impairment. The lowest score that any particular person can get is 0 and the highest score is 30.
Baseline to Week 4
Change in ADAS-Cog Score in ALL Subjects From Baseline to Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
The ADAS-Cog is a psychometric instrument that evaluates memory, attention, reasoning, language, orientation, and praxis. A higher score indicates more impairment. Scores from the original portion of the test range from 0 (best) to 85 (worse). A positive change indicates cognitive worsening.
Baseline to Week 4
Change in the Global Clinical Dementia Rating Score in ALL Subjects From Baseline to Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
The CDR is a clinical scale that rates the severity of dementia as absent, questionable, mild, moderate, or severe (CDR score of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, or 3, respectively). Higher score means more severe dementia rating. The score is based on interviews with the participant and study partner, using a structured interview that assesses six domains: memory, orientation, judgment and problem solving, community affairs, home and hobbies, and personal care.
Baseline to Week 4
Change in NPI Scores in ALL Subjects From Baseline to Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
The NPI is a well validated, reliable, multi-item instrument to assess psychopathology in AD based on interview with the study partner. The NPI evaluates both the frequency and severity of 10 neuropsychiatric disturbances. Frequency assessments range from 1 (occasionally, less than once per week) to 4 (very frequently, once or more per day or continuously) as well as severity (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The overall score and the score for each subscale are the product of severity and frequency. Overall score range from 0 meaning no disturbance to 144 meaning severe disturbance
Baseline to Week 4
Change in the Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Score in ALL Subjects From Baseline to Week 4
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
The ADCS-ADL is an activities-of-daily-living inventory developed by the ADCS to assess functional performance in participants with AD (Galasko et al., 1997). Using a structured interview format, study partners are queried as to whether participants attempted each item in the inventory during the prior 4 weeks and their level of performance. Overall score range from 0 meaning fully independent to 78 meaning fully dependent on assistance for activities of daily living
Baseline to Week 4
Secondary Outcome Measuring Serum Biomarker Outcome Level Changes From Baseline to Week 4 in Beta amyloid1-40 and Beta amyloid1-42 (ALL SUBJECTS)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
Change from baseline to week 4 in beta amyloid1-40 and beta amyloid1-42 serum levels comprised in secondary biomarker outcomes
Baseline to Week 4
Serum Biomarker Outcome Level Changes From Baseline to Week 4 in Beta amyloid1-40 and Beta amyloid1-42 (Non ApoE4 Carriers)
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
Change from baseline to week 4 in beta amyloid1-40 and beta amyloid1-42 serum levels comprised in secondary biomarker outcomes (non ApoE4 carriers)
Baseline to Week 4
Change in the Ratio of Beta Amyloid 42 to Beta Amyloid 40 in All Subjects
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
This measures the change in the ratio of Beta Amyloid 42 to Beta Amyloid 40 from baseline to week 4 in all subjects
Baseline to Week 4
Change in the Ratio of Beta Amyloid 42 to Beta Amyloid 40 in Non ApoE4 Carriers
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 4
This measures the change in the ratio of Beta Amyloid 42 to Beta Amyloid 40 from baseline to week 4 in non ApoE4 Carriers
Baseline to Week 4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey L Cummings, MD, ScD, The Cleveland Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

February 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 12, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe