- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01818531
Adductor Canal Block for Medial Compartment Knee Arthroplasty
September 12, 2018 updated by: Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Evaluation of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Blockade for Postoperative Analgesia Following Robotic Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement
This study will evaluate the affects of a single injection ultrasound-guided adductor canal block for patients undergoing robotic-assisted (MAKOplasty) medial UKA (unicompartmental knee arthroplasty).
Specifically, this study will compare the adequacy of postoperative analgesia provided by the adductor canal block with that provided by single injection lumbar plexus blockade.
The working hypothesis is that the analgesia provided by the adductor canal block will be equivalent to the analgesia provided by the lumbar plexus block.
The primary outcome will be a comparison of verbal numerical pain scores at rest and with movement over the first 24 hours following nerve blockade.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
150
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27157
- Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged 18-85
- Undergoing unilateral robotic-assisted (MAKOplasty) medial compartment knee arthroplasty at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center.
- Must give written informed consent for anesthesia including subarachnoid blockade and peripheral nerve blockade of both the lumbar plexus and adductor canal.
- Must consent to the performance of a sham block at the site to which they are not randomized.
- Must also be reliable to give accurate verbal pain scores postoperatively.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contraindication to adductor canal blockade or lumbar plexus blockade (including significant coagulation abnormalities)
- History of opioid addiction or current chronic pain therapy for pain other than at the surgical site that is being treated with high-dose opioids (extended release opioids or > 40mg oxycodone equivalents per day)
- Allergy to study medications
- Failure to adequately place either the adductor canal or lumbar plexus blocks.
- Patients who decline or have a contraindication to subarachnoid blockade will also be excluded from the study.
- Pregnancy.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Adductor canal block
Patients in this arm will receive an adductor canal block prior to undergoing a medial compartment knee arthroplasty.
|
Other Names:
|
Active Comparator: Lumbar plexus block
Patients in this arm will receive a lumbar plexus block prior to undergoing a medial compartment knee arthroplasty.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Verbal Pain Scores at 6 Hours Post Nerve Blockade.
Time Frame: 6 hours post block.
|
Comparison of verbal numerical pain scores at rest and with movement 6 hours following nerve blockade.
The score range is 0-10 with higher scores denoting worse outcomes.
|
6 hours post block.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Opioid Consumption
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours
|
Comparison of cumulative opioid consumption over 24 hour period between adductor canal block and lumbar plexus block.
|
6, 12, 18, and 24 hours
|
Time to First Analgesic
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Time to first analgesic between two groups: adductor canal block and lumbar plexus block.
|
24 hours
|
Opioid Related Side Effects
Time Frame: 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours
|
Occurrence of opioid related side effects (nausea, vomiting and pruritus) between two groups: adductor canal block and lumbar plexus block.
|
6, 12, 18, and 24 hours
|
Quadriceps Motor Strength
Time Frame: 6 hours
|
Comparison of quadriceps motor strength at 6 hour post nerve block between two groups: adductor canal block and lumbar plexus block.
The score range is 0-5, with higher scores denoting better outcomes.
|
6 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
- Schuirmann DJ. A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1987 Dec;15(6):657-80. doi: 10.1007/BF01068419.
- Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Lund J, Fomsgaard JS, Bache S, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Effects of adductor-canal-blockade on pain and ambulation after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Mar;56(3):357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02621.x. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
- Lund J, Jenstrup MT, Jaeger P, Sorensen AM, Dahl JB. Continuous adductor-canal-blockade for adjuvant post-operative analgesia after major knee surgery: preliminary results. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Jan;55(1):14-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2010.02333.x. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
- Davis JJ, Bond TS, Swenson JD. Adductor canal block: more than just the saphenous nerve? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Nov-Dec;34(6):618-9. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181bfbf00. No abstract available.
- Farrar JT, Berlin JA, Strom BL. Clinically important changes in acute pain outcome measures: a validation study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003 May;25(5):406-11. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(03)00162-3.
- Meek RM, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications. Orthop Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;35(2):191-200. doi: 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00115-9.
- Riddle DL, Jiranek WA, McGlynn FJ. Yearly incidence of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Apr;23(3):408-12. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.012. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
- GARDNER E. The innervation of the knee joint. Anat Rec. 1948 May;101(1):109-30. doi: 10.1002/ar.1091010111. No abstract available.
- Horner G, Dellon AL. Innervation of the human knee joint and implications for surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Apr;(301):221-6.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2015
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2015
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 21, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 21, 2013
First Posted (Estimate)
March 26, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 13, 2018
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 12, 2018
Last Verified
September 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00023002
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Postoperative Analgesia
-
Cukurova UniversityCompleted
-
Suez Canal UniversityCompleted
-
Tanta UniversityCompleted
-
Ain Shams UniversityCompleted
-
Minia UniversityCompletedPostoperative AnalgesiaEgypt
-
Minia UniversityCompletedPostoperative AnalgesiaEgypt
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedPostoperative Analgesia
-
Assiut UniversityCompletedPostoperative Analgesia
-
National Cancer Institute, EgyptNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingPostoperative Analgesia
Clinical Trials on Adductor canal block
-
Benaroya Research InstituteCompletedPost-Operative PainUnited States
-
Karaman Training and Research HospitalCompletedOsteo Arthritis KneeTurkey
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompleted
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkRecruiting
-
Seoul National University HospitalSeoul National UniversityCompletedPostoperative PainKorea, Republic of
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompletedOsteoarthritis | Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) | FallsUnited States
-
University of California, Los AngelesCompleted
-
Asklepieion Voulas General HospitalChryssoula Staikou; Aikaterini KalampokiniUnknown
-
Cairo UniversityNot yet recruitingAdductor Canal Block
-
Medipol UniversityCompletedKnee ArthropathyTurkey